Comparison of immune responses to zirconia, polyether ether ketone (PEEK), and stainless-steel in orthopaedic implants
- Agung Riyanto Budi Santoso
(RSUD Prof. Dr. Saiful Anwar Malang, Malang, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Brawijaya, Department of Orthopedic and Traumatology, Indonesia)
- Respati Suryanto Dradjat
(RSUD Prof. Dr. Saiful Anwar Malang, Malang, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Brawijaya, Department of Orthopedic and Traumatology, Indonesia)
- Edi Mustamsir
(RSUD Prof. Dr. Saiful Anwar Malang, Malang, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Brawijaya, Department of Orthopedic and Traumatology, Indonesia)
- Setyawan Purnomo Sakti
(University of Brawijaya, Malang, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Science, Department of Physics, Indonesia)
- Panji Sananta
(RSUD Prof. Dr. Saiful Anwar Malang, Malang, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Brawijaya, Department of Orthopedic and Traumatology, Indonesia)
- Hidayat Sujuti
(University of Brawijaya, Malang, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Biochemistry and Biomolecular, Indonesia)
- Heri Suroto
(Rumah Sakit Dokter Soetomo, Surabaya, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Department of Orthopedic and Traumatology, Indonesia)
Abstract
Aim: Orthopedic implants must meet specific criteria, including mechanical strength, durability, and biocompatibility. This study compares the immune response of zirconia, polyether ether ketone (PEEK), and stainless-steel implants in vivo, focusing on lymphocyte and fibroblast infiltration as indicators of immune activation.
Methods: A total of 27 New Zealand white rabbits were used, with nine animals in each group. Implants of zirconia, PEEK, or stainless steel were surgically placed in the thigh and observed for 4 weeks. Histological analysis measured lymphocyte and fibroblast infiltration at the implant site using a microscope at 400x magnification. Statistical analysis included the Kruskal-Wallis test for group comparisons, followed by Mann-Whitney and Bonferroni correction for pairwise comparisons.
Results: The Kruskal-Wallis test showed significant differences in lymphocyte (p=0.002) and fibroblast (p=0.003) counts among the groups. Zirconia exhibited significantly lower lymphocyte (median=0.5) and fibroblast (median=1.0) infiltration compared to stainless steel (lymphocytes: median=3.0, fibroblasts: median=2.0), and PEEK (lymphocytes: median=2.0, fibroblasts: median=3.0). Bonferroni correction confirmed zirconia showed the least immune activation (p<0.0167).
Conclusion: Zirconia offers superior biocompatibility with minimal immune response, making it an ideal material for orthopedic implants, particularly for patients with metal sensitivities. PEEK showed moderate immune activation but is helpful for non-load-bearing applications. Stainless Steel induced the highest immune response due to the release of metal ions and corrosion. Zirconia is the most biocompatible material tested, making it a promising choice for orthopedic implants.
Keywords: immunity, polyetheretherketone, prostheses and implants, stainless-steel, zirconia.
How to Cite:
Riyanto Budi Santoso, A., Suryanto Dradjat, R., Mustamsir, E., Purnomo Sakti, S., Sananta, P., Sujuti, H. & Suroto, H., (2026) “Comparison of immune responses to zirconia, polyether ether ketone (PEEK), and stainless-steel in orthopaedic implants”, Medicinski glasnik 23(1), 216-220. doi: https://doi.org/10.17392/2037-23-01
Downloads:
Download PDF
View PDF
7 Views
0 Downloads