Skip to main content
Original article

Comparative evaluation of HbA1c in point-of-care testing (POCT) devices: enzymatic and immunoassay methods compared to ion-exchange high-performance liquid chromatography (IE-HPLC)

Authors
  • Windradini Rahvian Aridama orcid logo (Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Faculty of Medicine, Study Program of Clinical Pathology, Indonesia)
  • Ferdy Royland Marpaung (Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Pathology, Indonesia)
  • Yessy Puspitasari (Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Pathology, Indonesia)

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate 3 point-of-care testing (POCT) devices in testing HbA1c: the Simplex TAS TM 101 (Tascom Co. Ltd., South Korea), which utilizes an enzymatic method, and two immunoassay-based devices, the Zybio Q8 Pro and Zybio EXR 110 (Zybio Inc., China).

Methods: A total of 40 whole blood samples with EDTA anticoagulant were collected patients undergoing HbA1c testing at the outpatient department. The samples were analyzed using 3 POCT devices and one reference method.

Results: Passing-Bablok regression revealed no significant fixed or proportional bias. Strong correlations with the gold standard were observed for Simplex TAS TM 101 (r=0.944), Zybio Q8 Pro (r=0.910), and Zybio EXR 110 (r=0.839), all with p<0.001. Bland-Altman analysis confirmed that the majority of measurements fell within an acceptable clinical range.

Conclusion: This study demonstrated that the three POCT devices employing enzymatic and immunoassay methods served as reliable alternatives to ion exchange-high-performance liquid chromatography (IE-HPLC) for HbA1c measurement in clinical practice.

Keywords: diabetes, laboratory, point-of-care testing

How to Cite:

Rahvian Aridama, W., Royland Marpaung, F. & Puspitasari, Y., (2026) “Comparative evaluation of HbA1c in point-of-care testing (POCT) devices: enzymatic and immunoassay methods compared to ion-exchange high-performance liquid chromatography (IE-HPLC)”, Medicinski glasnik 23(1), 18-22. doi: https://doi.org/10.17392/2102-23-01

Downloads:
Download PDF
View PDF

14 Views

2 Downloads

Published on
2026-02-27

Peer Reviewed

License

CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0