Comparison of early and delayed lumbar disc herniation surgery and the treatment outcome
- Ermin Hadžić
(Cantonal Hospital “Dr. Safet Mujić”, Mostar, Division of Neurosurgery, Bosnia and Herzegovina)
- Bruno Splavski ('Sestre milosrdnice''University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Department of Neurosurgery, Croatia)
- Goran Lakičević (University Clinical Hospital, Mostar, Department of Neurosurgery, Bosnia and Herzegovina)
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate the influence of preoperative symptoms duration on surgical outcome of one-level lumbar disc herniation surgery.
Methods: In a prospective randomized study, 67 adult patients with one-level lumbar disc herniation were analysed. The patients whose duration of symptoms was <6 months were included in the case group, while those with the duration of symptoms ˃6 months formed the control group. The investigated preoperative variables were: pain intensity in the back and legs (Visual Analogue Scale - VAS), Sciatica Bothersomeness Index (SBI), index of disability (Oswestry Disability Index - ODI). Postoperative variables were: pain intensity in the back and legs (VAS), SBI, ODI, and outcome according to the Odom’s criteria (excellent, good, satisfactory and poor). Significance level was set at p <0.05.
Results: A statistically significant difference was recorded between the groups, showing a better decrease of radicular pain intensity and sciatica bothersome, as well as patients disability in the case group (p<0.001). According to the Odom’s criteria the outcome was better in the case group, since the difference between the groups was statistically significant too (p<0.05).
Conclusion: Early lumbar disc herniation surgery performed within the first 6 months from the start of symptoms is beneficial due to decreases of radicular pain intensity, sciatica bothersomeness, and patient’s disability.
Keywords: discectomy, intervertebral disc, pain, radiculopathy, syndrome
How to Cite:
Hadžić, E., Splavski, B. & Lakičević, G., (2021) “Comparison of early and delayed lumbar disc herniation surgery and the treatment outcome”, Medicinski glasnik 18(2), 456-462. doi: https://doi.org/10.17392/1343-21
Downloads:
Download PDF
View PDF
0 Views
0 Downloads