Skip to main content
Original article

Does odor and taste identification change during hyperemesis gravidarum?

Authors
  • Mehmet Yasar (Kayseri Training and Research Hospital, Kayseri , Department of Ear, Nose, and Throat, Turkey)
  • Mustafa Sagit (Kayseri Training and Research Hospital, Kayseri, Department of Ear, Nose, and Throat, Turkey)
  • Semih Zeki Uludag (Erciyes University School of Medicine, Kayseri, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Turkey)
  • Ibrahim Ozcan (Kayseri Training and Research Hospital, Kayseri , Department of Ear, Nose, and Throat, Turkey)

Abstract

Aim: To investigate a difference in odor and taste identification among pregnant women with hyperemesis gravidarum, those with healthy pregnancy and non-pregnant women.

Methods: This prospective, controlled study included 33 pregnant women with hyperemesis gravidarum, 33 healthy pregnant and 26 non-pregnant women. For all participants, rhinological examinations were performed. Odor and taste identification were performed by holding Sniffin Sticks test battery (Burghart, Wedel, Germany) in all participants.

Results: There was a statistically significant difference in results of odor identification tests among the groups (p=0.031). Rose odor was selected as the most pleasant odor by the hyperemesis gravidarum group, 32 (96.9%). Orange odor was selected as the most pleasant odor by the healthy pregnant women, 33 (100%) whereas the banana odor was selected as the most pleasant odor by the healthy non-pregnant women, 10 (38.4%). In taste identification tests, there was a significant difference in total taste scores among the groups (p=0.003).

Conclusion: It is obvious that there is a need to evaluate odor thresholds and other parameters by detailed studies on odor perception in the context of hyperemesis gravidarum.

Keywords: pregnancy, smell, sense of smell

How to Cite:

Yasar, M., Sagit, M., Uludag, S. Z. & Ozcan, I., (2016) “Does odor and taste identification change during hyperemesis gravidarum?”, Medicinski glasnik 13(1), 50-56. doi: https://doi.org/10.17392/833-16

Downloads:
Download PDF
View PDF

0 Views

0 Downloads

Published on
2016-09-01

Peer Reviewed

License

CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0