×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Review paper

Rare and uncommon diseases of the hip: arthroscopic treatment

By
Christian Carulli Orcid logo ,
Christian Carulli
Contact Christian Carulli

Orthopaedic Clinic, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy

Orthopaedic Traumatology Centre, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy

Alberto Schiavo ,
Alberto Schiavo

Orthopaedic Clinic, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy

Orthopaedic Traumatology Centre, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy

Alberto Rigon ,
Alberto Rigon
Wondi De Marchi ,
Wondi De Marchi

Orthopaedic Traumatology Centre, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy

Orthopaedic Clinic, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy

Matteo Innocenti ,
Matteo Innocenti

Orthopaedic Clinic, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy

Orthopaedic Traumatology Centre, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy

Luigi Meccariello ,
Luigi Meccariello

Orthopaedic Traumatology Centre, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy

Massimo Innocenti
Massimo Innocenti

Orthopaedic Clinic, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy

Orthopaedic Traumatology Centre, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy

Abstract

Aim
Uncommon and rare hip diseases are sources of pain and functional limitation particularly in young patients. Some of these conditions may be nowadays treated by arthroscopy due to the expertise and technical tips that high-volume hip arthroscopies have achieved during the last decades ensuring a wider range of indications for such a procedure. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical results of arthroscopy in treating uncommon or rare diseases of the hip at a single Institution.
Methods
Thirteen patients affected by several types of diseases were treated by a hip arthroscopy and retrospectively evaluated.
All patients were operated by the same surgeon, instrumentation and technique, but postoperative rehabilitative protocol was tailored on each patient and his disease. Each patient underwent a specific imaging, consisting of dedicated x-rays and arthro-MRI. Modified Harris Hip score (mHHS) and Non-Arthritic Hip score (NAHS) were used before and after surgery to clinically assess the outcome.
Results
All patients reported satisfaction, pain relief, and a good functional recovery at the latest follow-up visit. Only one patient
affected by chondromatosis reported a recurrence of synovitis and needed a further arthroscopy 25 months after the index operation. No complications were reported at the latest follow-up. The NAHS and mHHS showed good improvements and all patients referred high satisfaction.
Conclusion
Hip arthroscopy performed by expert and high-volume surgeons may ensure good results in patients affected by uncommon and rare hip diseases.

References

1.
Wall P, Brown J, Parsons N, Buchbinder R, Costa M, Griffin D. Surgery for treating hip impingement (femoroacetabular impingement). Cochrane Database Syst Rev.
2.
Pierannunzii L, Benedetto D, Carulli P, Fiorentino C, Munegato G, Panascì D, et al. Mid-term outcome after arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement: development of a predictive score. HIP Int. 2019. p. 303–9.
3.
Rath E, Amar E, Doron R, Matsuda D. Hip arthroscopy for synovial chondromatosis: tips and tricks. Arthrosc Tech. 2014. p. 709–12.
4.
Lee Y, Moon K, Kim J, Hwang J, Ha Y, Koo K. Remaining loose bodies after arthroscopic surgery including extensive capsulectomy for synovial chondromatosis of the hip. CiOS Clin Orthop Surg. 2018. p. 393–7.
5.
O’donnell J, Klaber I, Takla A. Ligamentum teres reconstruction: indications, technique and minimum 1-year results in nine patients. J Hip Preserv Surg. 2020. p. 140–6.
6.
Oduwole K, Sa D, Kay D, Findakli J, Duong F, Simunovic A, et al. Surgical treatment of femoroacetabular impingement following slipped capital femoral epiphysis: A systematic review. Bone Joint Res. 2017. p. 472–80.
7.
Chen A, Youderian A, Watkins S, Gourineni P. Arthroscopic femoral neck osteoplasty in slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Arthroscopy. 2014. p. 1229–34.
8.
Basheer S, Cooper A, Maheshwari R, Balakumar B, Madan S. Arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement following slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Bone Joint J. 2016. p. 21–7.
9.
Allen M, Rosenfeld S. Treatment for post-slipped capital femoral epiphysis deformity. Orthop Clin North Am. 2020. p. 37–53.
10.
Wylie J, Beckmann J, Maak T, Aoki S. Arthroscopic treatment of mild to moderate deformity after slipped capital femoral epiphysis: Intra-operative findings and functional outcomes. Arthroscopy. 2015. p. 247–53.
11.
Tscholl P, Zingg P, Dora C, Frey E, Dierauer S, Ramseier L. Arthroscopic osteochondroplasty in patients with mild slipped capital femoral epiphysis after in situ fixation. J Child Orthop. 2016. p. 25–30.
12.
Adib F, Johnson A, Hennrikus W, Nasreddine A, Kocher M, Yen YM. Iliopsoas tendonitis after hip arthroscopy: prevalence, risk factors and treatment algorithm. J Hip Preserv Surg. 2018. p. 362–9.
13.
Gouveia K, Shah A, Kay J, Memon M, Simunovic N, Cakic J, et al. Iliopsoas tenotomy during hip arthroscopy: a systematic review of postoperative outcomes. Am J Sports Med. 2020. p. 363546520922551.
14.
Maldonado D, Krych A, Levy B, Hartigan D, Laseter J, Domb B. Does iliopsoas lengthening adversely affect clinical outcomes after hip arthroscopy? A multicenter comparative study. Am J Sports Med. 2018. p. 2624–31.
15.
Carulli C, Tonelli F, Melani T, Pietragalla M, Renzis D, Caracchini A, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance arthrography in detecting intra-articular pathology associated with femoroacetabular impingement. Joints. 2018. p. 104–9.
16.
Shifrin L, Reis N. Arthroscopy of a dislocated hip replacement: a case report. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980. p. 213–4.
17.
Boyer T, Dorfmann H. Arthroscopy in primary synovial chondromatosis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008. p. 314–8.
18.
Zini R, Longo U, Benedetto D, Loppini M, Carraro M, Maffulli A, et al. Arthroscopic management of primary synovial chondromatosis of the hip. Arthroscopy. 2013. p. 420–6.
19.
Zhou M, Li Z, Wang Y, Liu Y, Zhang S, Fu J, et al. Arthroscopic debridement and synovium resection for inflammatory hip arthritis. Chin Med Sci J. 2013. p. 39–43.
20.
Byrd J, Jones K, Maiers G. Two to 10 years’ follow-up of arthroscopic management of pigmented villonodular synovitis in the hip: a case series. Arthroscopy. 2013. p. 1783–7.
21.
Larson C, Stone R, Grossi E, Giveans M. Cornelsen GD. Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: arthroscopic management for extreme soft-tissue hip instability. Arthroscopy. 2015. p. 2287–94.
22.
Alfikey A, El-Bakoury A, Karim M, Farouk H, Kaddah M, Abdelazeem A. Role of arthroscopy for the diagnosis and management of post-traumatic hip pain: a prospective study. J Hip Preserv Surg. 2019. p. 377–84.
23.
Perets I, Hartigan D, Chaharbakhshi E, Ashberg L, Mu B, Domb B. Clinical outcomes and return to sport in competitive athletes undergoing arthroscopic iliopsoas fractional lengthening compared with a matched control group without iliopsoas fractional lengthening. Arthroscopy. 2018. p. 456–63.
24.
Harris W. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 1969. p. 737–55.
25.
Christensen C, Althausen P, Mittleman M, Lee J Ann, Mccarthy J. The nonarthritic hip score: Reliable and validated. Clin.Orthop Relat Res. 2003. p. 75–83.
26.
Aubry S, Bélanger D, Giguère C, Lavigne M. Magnetic resonance arthrography of the hip: technique and spectrum of findings in younger patients. Insights Imaging. 2010. p. 72–82.
27.
Newman J, Saroki A, Philippon M. Hip arthroscopy for the management of trauma: a literature review. J Hip Preserv Surg. 2015. p. 242–8.

Citation

Authors retain copyright. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Creative Commons License

 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.