Department of Cardiology, Clinic for Heart, Blood Vessel and Rheumatic Diseases, Clinical Centre University of Sarajevo,
Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
Department of Angiology, Clinic for Heart, Blood Vessel and Rheumatic Diseases, Clinical Centre University of Sarajevo,
Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
Aim To determine the effect of the load on the meniscus in relation to a different angle, and to present the impact of force on eventual injury of menisci. Methods Research included 200 males with average height of 178.5 cm, mass 83.5 kg, and average age of 22 years. The simulation of treadmill that was used in the evaluation of ischemic heart disease was made. Effects on the knee were evaluated by measuring at different inclinations (5°70’, 6°80’, 7°90’, 9°10’, 10°20’, 11°30’ and 12°40’). Results With increasing ascent of treadmill the load on the meniscus also increased. Each increase in ascent after 22% (which corresponded to the angle of 12°40’ and seventh degree of load according to the Bruce protocol) at given anthropological values was an etiological factor for meniscus injury. Conclusion The seventh degree of load according to the Bruce protocol can lead to the meniscus injury.
Loftin M, Sothern M, Warren B, Udall J. Comparison of VO2 Peak during Treadmill and Cycle Ergometry in Severely Overweight Youth. J Sports Sci Med. 2004. p. 554–60.
2.
Kharabsheh S, Al-Sugair A, Al-Buraiki J, Al-Farhan J. Overview of exercise stress testing. Annals of Saudi medicine. 2006. p. 1–6.
Garner K, Pomeroy W, Arnold J. Exercise stress testing: indications and common questions. Am Fam Physician. 2017. p. 293–9.
5.
Silva A, Armstrong A, Silveira F, Cavalcanti M, França F, Correia L. Prevalence and factors associated with inappropriate use of treadmill exercise stress test for coronary artery disease: a cross-sectional study. BMC cardiovascular disorders. 2015. p. 54.
6.
Victor De Sousa C, Sales M, Sda A, Boullosa S, D, Tdos R, et al. Double product break point estimates ventilatory threshold in individuals with type 2 diabetes. J Phys Ther Sci. 2016. p. 1775–80.
7.
Susko A, Fitzgerald G. The pain-relieving qualities of exercise in knee osteoarthritis. Open Access Rheumatol. 2013. p. 81–91.
8.
Helito C, Demange M, Bonadio M, Tírico L, Gobbi R, Pécora J, et al. Anatomy and histology of the knee anterolateral ligament. Orthop J Sports Med. 2013. p. 2325967113513546.
9.
Makris E, Hadidi P, Athanasiou K. The knee meniscus: structure-function, pathophysiology, current repair techniques, and prospects for regeneration. Biomaterials. 2011. p. 7411–31.
10.
Claes S, Vereecke E, Maes M, Victor J, Verdonk P, Bellemans J. Anatomy of the anterolateral ligament of the knee. J Anat. 2013. p. 321–8.
11.
Fox A, Bedi A, Rodeo S. The basic science of human knee menisci: structure, composition, and function. Sports Health. 2012. p. 340–51.
12.
Doral M, Bilge O, Huri G, Turhan E, Verdonk R. Modern treatment of meniscal tears. EFORT Open Rev. 2018. p. 260–8.
13.
Mordecai S, Al-Hadithy N, Ware H, Gupte C. Treatment of meniscal tears: An evidence based approach. World J Orthop. 2014. p. 233–41.
14.
Beaufils P, Becker R, Kopf S, Matthieu O, Pujol N. The knee meniscus: management of traumatic tears and degenerative lesions. EFORT Open Rev. 2017. p. 195–203.
15.
Bryceland J, Powell A, Nunn T. Knee Menisci. Cartilage. 2017. p. 99–104.
16.
Chivers M, Howitt S. Anatomy and physical examination of the knee menisci: a narrative review of the orthopedic literature. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2009. p. 319–33.
17.
Heckmann T, Barber-Westin S, Noyes F. Meniscal repair and transplantation: indications, techniques, rehabilitation, and clinical outcome. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006. p. 795–814.
18.
Pellegrino M, Trinchese E, Bisaccia M, Rinonapoli G, Meccariello L, Falzarano G, et al. Long-term outcome of grade III and IV chondral injuries of the knee treated with Steadman microfracture technique. 2016. p. 237–40.
19.
Rollo G, Falzarano G, Ronga M, Bisaccia M, Grubor P, Erasmo R, et al. Challenges in the management of floating knee injuries: Results of treatment and outcomes of 224 consecutive cases in 10 years. Injury. 2019. p. 30–8.
20.
Zaciorski W. Fundamentals of sports metrology. Moscow: Fizkultura i Sport. 1979.
21.
Abdelgaied A, Stanley M, Galfe M, Berry H, Ingham E, Fisher J. Comparison of the biomechanical tensile and compressive properties of decellularised and natural porcine meniscus. J Biomech. 2015. p. 1389–96.
22.
Majewski M, Susanne H, Klaus. Epidemiology of athletic knee injuries: A 10-year study. Knee. 2006. p. 184–8.
23.
Frizziero A, Ferrari R, Giannotti E, Ferroni C, Poli P, Masiero S. The meniscus tear. State of the art of rehabilitation protocols related to surgical procedures. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2013. p. 295–301.
24.
Reid C, Bush P, Cummings N, Mcmullin D, Durrani S. A review of occupational knee disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2010. p. 489–501.
25.
Mcmillan G, Nichols L. Osteoarthritis and meniscus disorders of the knee as occupational diseases of miners. Occup Environ Med. 2005. p. 567–75.
26.
Snoeker B, Bakker E, Kegel C, Lucas C. Risk factors for meniscal tears: a systematic review including meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2013. p. 352–67.
27.
Brindle T, Nyland J, Johnson D. The meniscus: review of basic principles with application to surgery and rehabilitation. J Athl Train. 2001. p. 160–9.
28.
Raj M, Bubnis M. Treasure Island (FL). Stat-Pearls. StatPearls Publishing; 2020.
29.
Fathala A. Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy: techniques, interpretation, indications and reporting. Ann Saudi Med. 2011. p. 625–34.
30.
Wehrschuetz M, Wehrschuetz E, Schuchlenz H, Schaffler G. Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64 row CT scanner-facing the facts. Clin Med Insights Cardiol. 2010. p. 15–22.
31.
Zhou T. Analysis of the biomechanical characteristics of the knee joint with a meniscus injury. Healthcare Technology Letters. 2018. p. 247–9.
32.
Ma J, Cui S, Hu F, Lu Q, Li W. Incidence and characteristics of meniscal injuries in cadets at a military school. 2013-2015. J Athl Train. 2016. p. 876–9.
33.
Rollo G, Pichierri P, Grubor P, Marsilio A, Bisaccia M, Grubor M, et al. The challenge of nonunion and malunion in distal femur surgical revision. Med Glas (Zenica). 2019.
34.
Falzarano G, Pica G, Medici A, Rollo G, Bisaccia M, Cioffi R, et al. Foot loading and gait analysis evaluation of nonarticular tibial pilon fracture: a comparison of three surgical techniques. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2018. p. 894–8.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.