Aim To evaluate tunnel positioning on radiographs in singlebundle (SB) and double-bundle (DB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, to evaluate if measurement is accurate and reproducible. Methods Radiographs of 30 SB and 30 DB ACL reconstruction were reviewed by two examiners who measured tunnel positioning with the quadrant method on the femur (a=depth, b=height) and the Amis and Jakob method on the tibia. Intra- and inter-observer reliability were evaluated with intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Results A radiographic analysis was completed in all patients in a SB-group and in 27 in a DB-group (p>0.05). Intra-observer reliability was almost perfect on femoral (ICC: a=0.85, b=0.83) and tibial (ICC=0.87) side in the SB-group. In the DB-group, it was almost perfect for tibial anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) bundles (ICC: AM=0.84, PL=0.81) and for femoral PL bundle (ICC: a=0.83, b=0.82), and substantial for femoral AM bundle (ICC: a=0.78, b=0.74). Inter-observer reliability was almost perfect on tibial (ICC=0.81) and femoral (ICC: a=0.81, b=0.87) side in the SB-group, and substantial on tibial (ICC: AM=0.71, PL=0.77) and femoral (ICC: AM a=0.73, b=0.78; PL a=0.74, b=0.76) side in the DB-group. Standard deviation (SD) was low (±9%) with respect to the centre of tunnel(s). Conclusion The quadrant method and the Amis and Jakob method are accurate and reproducible measurement methods. Also, as SD was low, an outside-in approach with a front-entry guide, which is free-hand positioned, can be postulated as a reliable method to locate the femoral tunnel in SB reconstruction and the AM bundle in DB reconstruction.
Hamada M, Shino K, Horibe S, Mitsuoka T, Miyama T, Shiozaki Y, et al. Single-versus bi-socket anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autogenous multiple-stranded hamstring tendons with endoButton femoral fixation: a prospective study. Arthroscopy. 2001. p. 801–7.
2.
Cha P, Brucker P, West RV, Zelle B, Yagi M, Kurosaka M, et al. Arthroscopic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an anatomic approach. Arthroscopy. 2005. p. 1275–6.
3.
Aglietti P, Giron F, Cuomo P, Losco M, Mondanelli N. Single-and double-incision double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007. p. 108–13.
4.
Zavras T, Race A, Amis A. The effect of femoral attachment location on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: graft tension patterns and restoration of normal anterior-posterior laxity patterns. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2005. p. 92–100.
5.
Giron F, Cuomo P, Aglietti P, Bull A, Amis A. Femoral attachment of the anterior cruciate ligament. Knee Surgery Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006. p. 250–6.
6.
Aglietti P, Giron F, Losco M, Cuomo P, Ciardullo A, Mondanelli N. Comparison between single-and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomized, single-blinded clinical trial. Am J Sports Med. 2010. p. 25–34.
7.
Chen H, Tie K, Qi Y, Li B, Chen B, Chen L. Anteromedial versus transtibial technique in single-bundle autologous hamstring ACL reconstruction: a metaanalysis of prospective randomized controlled trials. J Orthop Surg Res. 2017. p. 1–10.
8.
Tiamklang T, Sumanont S, Foocharoen T, Laopaiboon M. Double-bundle versus single-bundle reconstruction for anterior cruciate ligament rupture in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012.
9.
Mascarenhas R, Cvetanovich G, Sayegh E, Verma N, Cole B, Bush-Joseph C, et al. Does double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction improve postoperative knee stability compared with single-bundle techniques? A systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses. Arthroscopy. 2015. p. 1185–96.
10.
Osti M, Krawinkel A, Ostermann M, Hoffelner T, Benedetto K. Femoral and tibial graft tunnel parameters after transtibial, anteromedial portal, and outside-in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2015. p. 2250–8.
11.
Edwards A, Bull A, Amis A. The attachments of the anteromedial and posterolateral fibre bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament: Part 2: Femoral attachment. Knee Surgery Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008. p. 29–36.
12.
Jackson D, Gasser S. Tibial tunnel placement in ACL reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 1994. p. 124–31.
13.
Amis A, Jakob R. Anterior cruciate ligament graft positioning, tensioning and twisting. Knee Surgery Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. 1998. p. 2–12.
14.
Colombet P, Robinson J, Christel P, Franceschi J, Djian P, Bellier G, et al. Morphology of anterior cruciate ligament attachments for anatomic reconstruction: a cadaveric dissection and radiographic study. Arthroscopy. 2006. p. 984–92.
15.
Giron F, Cuomo P, Edwards A, Bull A, Amis A, Aglietti P. Double-bundle “anatomic” anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cadaveric study of tunnel positioning with a transtibial technique. Arthroscopy. 2007. p. 7–13.
16.
Ferretti M, Ekdahl M, Shen W, Fu F. Osseous landmarks of the femoral attachment of the anterior cruciate ligament: an anatomic study. Arthroscopy. 2007. p. 1218–25.
17.
Zantop T, Wellmann M, Fu F, Petersen W. Tunnel positioning of anteromedial and posterolateral bundles in anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: anatomic and radiographic findings. Am J Sports Med. 2008. p. 65–72.
18.
Drews B, Merz C, Huth J, Gulkin D, Guelke J, Gebhard F, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in evaluation of tunnel diameters prior to revision ACL reconstruction: a comparison to computed tomography. Skeletal Radiol. 2017. p. 1361–6.
19.
Ducouret E, Loriaut P, Boyer P, Perozziello A, Pesquer L, Mounayer C, et al. Tunnel positioning assessment after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at 12 months: Comparison between 3D CT and 3D MRI. A pilot study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017. p. 937–42.
20.
Lee S, Jang H, Lee D, Nam S, Ha J, Kim J. Evaluation of femoral tunnel positioning using 3-dimensional computed tomography and radiographs after single bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with modified transtibial technique. Clin Orthop Surg. 2013. p. 188–94.
21.
Iriuchishima T, Ingham S, Tajima G, Horaguchi T, Saito A, Tokuhashi Y, et al. Evaluation of the tunnel placement in the anatomical double-bundle ACL reconstruction: A cadaver study. Knee Surgery Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010. p. 1226–31.
22.
Horie M, Muneta T, Yamazaki J, Nakamura T, Koga H, Watanabe T, et al. A modified quadrant method for describing the femoral tunnel aperture positions in ACL reconstruction using two-view plain radiographs. Knee Surgery Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015. p. 981–5.
23.
Lee J, Lee S, Seong S, Mc L. Anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament insertion sites: comparison of plain radiography and three-dimensional computed tomographic imaging to anatomic dissection. Knee Surgery Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015. p. 2297–305.
24.
Bernard M, Hertel P, Hornung H, Cierpinski T. Femoral insertion of the ACL. Radiographic quadrant method. Am J Knee Surg. 1997. p. 12–4.
25.
Giron F, Aglietti P, Cuomo P, Mondanelli N, Ciardullo A. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with double-looped semitendinosus and gracilis tendon graft directly fixed to cortical bone: 5-Year results. Knee Surgery Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. 2005. p. 81–91.
26.
Landis J, Koch G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977. p. 159–74.
27.
Musahl V, Burkart A, Debski R, Van Scyoc A, Fu F, Woo S. Anterior cruciate ligament tunnel placement: Comparison of insertion site anatomy with the guidelines of a computer-assisted surgical system. Arthroscopy. 2003. p. 154–60.
28.
Abreu-E-Silva G, De, Oliveira Mhgcn De, Maranhão G, Deligne L De, Mc, et al. Three-dimensional computed tomography evaluation of anterior cruciate ligament footprint for anatomic singlebundle reconstruction. Knee Surgery Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015. p. 770–6.
29.
Guo L, Yang L, Wang A, Wang X, Dai G. Roentgenographic measurement study for locating femoral insertion site of anterior cruciate ligament: A cadaveric study with X-Caliper. Int Orthop. 2009. p. 133–7.
30.
Pietrini S, Ziegler C, Anderson C, Wijdicks C, Westerhaus B, Johansen S, et al. Radiographic landmarks for tunnel positioning in double-bundle ACL reconstructions. Knee Surgery Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011. p. 792–800.
31.
Doi M, Takahashi M, Abe M, Suzuki D, Nagano A. Lateral radiographic study of the tibial sagital insertions of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of human anterior cruciate ligament. Knee Surgery Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009. p. 347–51.
32.
Cuomo P, Edwards A, Giron F, Bull A, Amis A, Aglietti P. Validation of the 65° Howell guide for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2006. p. 70–5.
33.
Stäubli H, Rauschning W. Tibial attachment area of the anterior cruciate ligament in the extended knee position -Anatomy and cryosections in vitro complemented by magnetic resonance arthrography in vivo. Knee Surgery Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. 1994. p. 138–46.
34.
Edwards A, Bull A, Amis A. The attachments of the anteromedial and posterolateral fibre bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament -Part 1: Tibial attachment. Knee Surgery Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007. p. 1414–21.
35.
Tashiro Y, Okazaki K, Iwamoto Y. Evaluating the distance between the femoral tunnel centers in anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a computer simulation. Open Access J Sports Med. 2015. p. 219–24.
36.
Yamazaki J, Muneta T, Koga H, Sekiya I, Ju Y, Morito T, et al. Radiographic description of femoral tunnel placement expressed as intercondylar clock time in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surgery Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011. p. 418–23.
37.
Zavras T, Amis A. Method for visualising and measuring the position of the femoral attachment of the ACL and ACL grafts in experimental work. J Biomech. 1998. p. 387–90.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
,
