×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Review paper

Key factors influencing clinical and functional outcomes in extracapsular proximal femur fractures: the role of early weightbearing - one-year follow-up cohort of 495 patients

By
Enrique Sanchez-Munoz Orcid logo ,
Enrique Sanchez-Munoz
Contact Enrique Sanchez-Munoz

Orthopaedic Surgery Department, University Hospital Centre of Toledo, Toledo, Spain

Beatriz Lozano-Hernanz ,
Beatriz Lozano-Hernanz

Orthopaedic Surgery Department, University Hospital Centre of Toledo, Toledo, Spain

Daniel Vicente Velarde-Garrido ,
Daniel Vicente Velarde-Garrido

Orthopaedic Surgery Department, University Hospital Centre of Toledo, Toledo, Spain

Leticia Alarma-Barcia ,
Leticia Alarma-Barcia

Orthopaedic Surgery Department, University Hospital Centre of Toledo, Toledo, Spain

Victor Trivino Sanchez-Mayoral ,
Victor Trivino Sanchez-Mayoral

Orthopaedic Surgery Department, University Hospital Centre of Toledo, Toledo, Spain

Paula Romera-Olivera ,
Paula Romera-Olivera

Orthopaedic Surgery Department, University Hospital Centre of Toledo, Toledo, Spain

Cristina Lopez Palacios
Cristina Lopez Palacios

Orthopaedic Surgery Department, University Hospital Centre of Toledo, Toledo, Spain

Abstract

Aim
To establish a correlation between immediate post-surgical weight bearing in extracapsular hip fractures and final functional outcome as well as to study the correlation between immediate post-surgical weight bearing and morbidity and mortality during the first year.
Methods
Retrospective observational cohort study including 495 consecutive patients ≥75 years old operated of extracapsular proximal femur fracture. Medical records were reviewed and information of demographic data, radiological evolution, time to weight-bearing, mortality rate, medical and surgical complications and final ambulation status were recorded.
Results
Patients’ mean age was 87 years; 378 (76.4%) were females. One-year mortality rate was 21.2%. Immediate weight bearing was associated with: decreased hospital stays (7.5 days vs. 9.2 days; p=0.001) and decreased medical complications (78.3% vs. 82.3 %; p=0.02). Surgical complications prevalence was comparable (4.4% vs. 7.8 %; p=0.43) within the groups. Despite mortality rate was lower in patients with immediate weight bearing (21%) compared with delayed weight bearing (21.4%), the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.9).
Conclusion
Immediate weight bearing was associated with shorter hospital stay and fewer medical complications, improving functional outcome. Also, no correlation was found between immediate weight bearing and increased surgical complications or mortality rate during first year after surgery.

References

1.
Morri M, Forni C, Marchioni M, Bonetti E, Marseglia F, Cotti A. Which factors are independent predictors of early recovery of mobility in the older adults’ population after hip fracture? A cohort prognostic study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018. p. 35–41.
2.
Petros R, Ferreira P, Petros R. Influence of proximal femur fractures in the autonomy and mortality of elderly patients submitted to osteosynthesis with cephalomedullary nail. Rev Bras Ortop. 2017. p. 57–62.
3.
Sierra P, T, Martín B, I, Solís R, J, et al. Predictive factors of hospital stay, mortality and functional recovery after surgery for hip fracture in elderly patients. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol. 2017. p. 427–35.
4.
Adeyemi A, Delhougne G. Incidence and Economic Burden of intertrochanteric fracture: a medicare claims database analysis. JBJS Open Access. 2019. p. 45.
5.
Wu J, Kurrle S, Id C. Restricted weight bearing after hip fracture surgery in the elderly: Economic costs and health outcomes. J Eval Clin Pract. 2009. p. 217–9.
6.
(32) with increased mortality rate in males (odds ratio 2.4) and patients over 90 years of age.
7.
Librero J, Peiró S, Leutscher E, Merlo J, Bernal-Delgado E, Ridao M, et al. Timing of surgery for hip fracture and inhospital mortality: a retrospective population-based cohort study in the Spanish National Health System. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012. p. 15.
8.
Sherrington C, Lord S, Herbert R. A randomized controlled trial of weight-bearing versus non-weightbearing exercise for improving physical ability after usual care for hip fracture. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004. p. 710–6.
9.
Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. Prevention and management of hip fracture in older people: a national clinical guideline. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. 2002.
10.
Ftouh S, Morga A, Swift C. Guideline Development Group. Management of hip fracture in adults: summary of NICE. BMJ. 2011. p. 3304.
11.
Barone A, Giusti A, Pizzonia M, Razzano M, Oliveri M, Palummeri E, et al. Factors associated with an immediate weight-bearing and early ambulation program for older adults after hip fracture repair. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009. p. 1495–8.
12.
Hsueh K, Fang C, Chen C, Su Y, Wu H, Chiu F. Risk factors in cutout of sliding hip screw in intertrochanteric fractures: An evaluation of 937 patients. Int Orthop. 2010. p. 1273–6.
13.
Andruszkow H, Frink M, Frömke C, Matityahu A, Zeckey C, Mommsen P, et al. Tip apex distance, hip screw placement, and neck shaft angle as potential risk factors for cut-out failure of hip screws after surgical treatment of intertrochanteric fractures. Int Orthop. 2012. p. 2347–54.
14.
Koval K, Friend K, Aharonoff G, Zukerman J. Weight bearing after hip fracture: a prospective series of 596 geriatric hip fracture patients. J Orthop Trauma. 1996. p. 526–30.
15.
Handoll H, Sherrington C, Mak J. Interventions for improving mobility after hip fracture surgery in adults. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2011.
16.
Grimshaw J, Russell I. Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations. Lancet. 1993. p. 1317–22.
17.
Carlson V, Ong A, Orozco F, Hernandez V, Lutz R, Post Z. Compliance with the AAOS Guidelines for treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2018. p. 103–7.
18.
Leigheb F, Vanhaecht K, Sermeus W, Lodewijckx C, Deneckere S, Boonen S, et al. The effect of care pathways for hip fractures: a systematic review. Calcif Tissue Int. 2012. p. 1–14.
19.
Müller M, Koch P, Nazarian S, Schatzker J. The Comprehensive Classification of Fractures of Long Bones. Springer; 1990.
20.
Sierra P, T, Martín B, I, Solís R, J, et al. Factores determinantes de estancia hospitalaria, mortalidad y evolución funcional tras cirugía por fractura de cadera en el anciano (Decisive Factors for hospital stay, mortality and functional outcome after hip fracture in the elderly patient). Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol. 2017. p. 427–35.
21.
Baumgaertner M, Curtin S, Lindskog D, Keggi J. The value of the tip-apex distance in predicting failure of fixation of peritrochanteric fractures of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995. p. 1058–64.
22.
Herman A, Landau Y, Gutman G, Ougortsin V, Chechick A, Shazar N. Radiological evaluation of intertrochanteric fracture fixation by the proximal femoral nail. Injury. 2012. p. 856–63.
23.
Abram S, Pollard T, Andrade A. Inadequate “three-point” proximal fixation predicts failure of the Gamma nail. Bone Jt J. 2013. p. 825–30.
24.
Baztán J, Del Molino P, Alarcón J, T, Cristobal S, Izquierdo E, et al. Índice de Barthel: Instrumento válido para la valoración funcional de pacientes con enfermedad cerebrovascular (Barthel Index: A valid instrument for functional assessment of patients with cerebral vascular disease). Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol. 1993. p. 32–40.
25.
Reisberg B, Ferris S, De Leon M, Crook T. The Global Deterioration Scale for assessment of primary degenerative dementia. Am J Psychiatry. 1982. p. 1136–9.
26.
Executive Committee. ASA Physical Status Classification System | American Society of Anesthesiologists. ASA; 2014.
27.
Ramos M, M. Tratamiento multidisciplinar de las fracturas de cadera (Multidisciplinary treatment of hip fractures). Multimédica Proyectos; 2009.
28.
Sanz-Reig J, Marín S, J, Alba P, J, Martínez F, et al. Factores de riesgo de mortalidad intrahospitalaria en la fractura proximal de fémur (Risk factors for mortality during hospital stay in proximal femur fracture). Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol. 2017. p. 209–15.
29.
Ariza-Vega P, Jiménez-Moleón J, Kristensen M. Non-weight-bearing status compromises the functional level up to 1 year after hip fracture surgery. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2014. p. 641–8.
30.
Fu M, Boddapati V, Gausden E, Samuel A, Russell L, Lane J. Surgery for a fracture of the hip within 24 hours of admission is independently associated with reduced short-term post-operative complications. Bone Joint J. 2017. p. 1216–22.
31.
Rosso F, Dettoni F, Bonasia D, Olivero F, Mattei L, Bruzzone M, et al. Prognostic factors for mortality after hip fracture: Operation within 48 hours is mandatory. Injury. 2016. p. 91–7.
32.
Frost S, Nguyen N, Black D, Eisman J, Nguyen T. Risk factors for in-hospital post-hip fracture mortality. Bone. 2011. p. 553–8.
33.
Bojan A, Beimel C, Taglang G, Ekholm C, Jönsson C, A. Critical factors in cut-out complication after gamma nail treatment of proximal femoral fractures. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013. p. 1.
34.
Zuckerman J, Koval K, Aharonoff G, Skovron M. A functional recovery score for elderly hip fracture patients: II. Validity and reliability. J Orthop Trauma. 2000. p. 26–30.
35.
Eberle S, Gerber C, Oldenburg V, Hungerer G, Augat S, P. Type of hip fracture determines load share in intramedullary osteosynthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009. p. 1972–80.

Citation

Authors retain copyright. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Creative Commons License

 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.