Aim To evaluate the case series of the patients operated with percutaneous fixation by the navigation system based on 3D fluoroscopic images, to assess the precision of a surgical implant and functional outcome of patients. Methods A retrospective study of pelvic ring fractures in a 2-year period included those treated with the use of the O-Arm 2 in combination with the Stealth Station 8. Pelvic fractures were classified according to the Tile and the Young-Burgess classification. All patients were examined before surgery, with X-rays and CT scans, and three days after surgery with additional CT scan. The positioning of the screws was evaluated according to the Smith score, the outcome with the SF-36. Results Among 24 patients 18 were with B and six with C type fracture according to Tile, while eight were with APC, 10 LC, and six with VS type according to Young-Burgess classification. All patients were treated in the supine position, except two. A total of 41 iliosacral or transsacral screws and five anterior pelvic ring screws were implanted. The medium surgical time per screw was 41 minutes. There was a perfect correspondence of screw scores value from post-operative CT and intraoperative fluoroscopy. The mean screw score value was 0.92. There were no cases of poor positioning. The median follow-up was 17.5 months. The patients were satisfied with their health condition on SF-36. Conclusion The use of the O-arm guarantees great precision in the positioning of the screws and reduced surgical times with excellent clinical results in patients.
Buller L, Best M, Quinnan S. A nationwide analysis of pelvic ring fractures: incidence and trends in treatment, length of stay, and mortality. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2016. p. 9–17.
2.
Giannoudis P, Grotz M, Tzioupis C, Dinopoulos H, Wells G, Bouamra O, et al. Prevalence of pelvic fractures, associated injuries and mortality: The United Kingdom perspective. J Trauma. 2007. p. 875–83.
3.
Pereira G, Damasceno E, Dinhane D, Bueno F, Leite J, Ancheschi B. Epidemiology of pelvic ring fractures and injuries. Rev Bras Ortop. 2017. p. 260–9.
4.
Rommens P. Is there a role for percutaneous pelvic and acetabular reconstruction? Injury. 2007. p. 463–77.
5.
Barei D, Bellabarba C, Mills W, Jr R, M. Percutaneous management of unstable pelvic ring disruptions. Injury. 2001. p. A33-44.
6.
Jr R, Nork M, Mills S, W. Percutaneous fixation of pelvic ring disruptions. Clin Orthop. 2000. p. 15–29.
7.
Routt M, Kregor P, Simonian P, Mayo K. Early results of percutaneous iliosacral screws placed with the patient in the supine position. J Orthop Trauma. 1995. p. 207–14.
8.
Schep N, Haverlag R, Van Vugt A. Computerassisted versus conventional surgery for insertion of 96 cannulated iliosacral screws in patients with postpartum pelvic pain. J Trauma. 2004. p. 1299–302.
9.
Takao M, Hamada H, Sakai T, Sugano N. Factors influencing the accuracy of iliosacral screw insertion using 3D fluoroscopic navigation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2019. p. 189–95.
10.
Mauro D, Rovere D, Smimmo G, Meschini A, Mocini C, Maccauro F, et al. COVID-19 pandemic: management of patients affected by SARS-CoV-2 in Rome COVID Hospital 2 Trauma Centre and safety of our surgical team. Int Orthop. 2020. p. 2487–91.
11.
Tile M, Helfet D, Kellam J. Fractures of the Pelvis and Acetabulum. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2003.
12.
Young J, Burgess A, Brumback R, Poka A. Pelvic fractures: value of plain radiography in early assessment and management. Radiology. 1986. p. 445–51.
13.
Liuzza F, Capasso L, Florio M, Mocini F, Masci G, Cazzato G, et al. Transiliosacral fixation using the O-ARM2® and STE-ALTHSTATION® navigation system. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2018. p. 163–71.
14.
Starr A, Walter J, Harris R, Reinert C, Jones A. Percutaneous screw fixation of fractures of the iliac wing and fracture-dislocations of the sacro-iliac joint (OTA Types 61-B2.2 and 61-B2.3, or Young-Burgess lateral compression type II pelvic fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2002. p. 116–23.
15.
Matta J, Yerasimides J. Table-skeletal fixation as an adjunct to pelvic ring reduction. Orthop Trauma. 2007. p. 647–56.
16.
Smith H, Yuan P, Sasso R, Papadopolous S, Vaccaro A. An evaluation of image-guided technologies in the placement of percutaneous iliosacral screws. Spine. 2006. p. 234–8.
17.
Ware J, Sherbourne C. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992. p. 473–83.
18.
Bullinger M, Kirchberger I. SF-36 Questionnaire for the Health Survey -Handbook for the German Version of Questionnaire. Hogrefe-Verlag; 1998.
19.
Hinsche A, Giannoudis P, Smith R. Fluoroscopybased multiplanar image guidance for insertion of sacroiliac screws. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002. p. 135–44.
20.
Routt M, Gary J, Kellam J, Burgess A. Improved Intraoperative fluoroscopy for pelvic and acetabular surgery. Orthop Trauma. 2019. p. 37–42.
21.
Liuzza F, Silluzio N, Florio M, Ezzo E, Cazzato O, Ciolli G, et al. Comparison between posterior sacral plate stabilization versus minimally invasive transiliac-transsacral lag-screw fixation in fractures of sacrum: a single-centre experience. Int Orthop. 2019. p. 177–85.
22.
Zwingmann J, Konrad G, Mehlhorn A, Südkamp N, Oberst M. Percutaneous iliosacral screw insertion: malpositioning and revision rate of screws with regards to application technique (navigated vs. conventional). J Trauma. 2010. p. 1501–6.
23.
Peng K, Huang K, Li C, Hsu Y, R. Percutaneous placement of iliosacral screws for unstable pelvic ring injuries: comparison between one and two C-arm fluoroscopic techniques. J Trauma. 2006. p. 602–8.
24.
Schep N, Haverlag R, Van Vugt A. Computerassisted versus conventional surgery for insertion of 96 cannulated iliosacral screws in patients with postpartum pelvic pain. J Trauma. 2004. p. 1299–302.
25.
Radetzki F, Wohlrab D, Goehre F, Wohlrab D, Goehre F, Noser H, et al. Anatomical conditions of the posterior pelvic ring regarding bisegmental transverse sacroiliac screw fixation: a 3D morphometric study of 125 pelvic CT datasets. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014. p. 1115–20.
26.
Theologis A, Burch S, Pekmezci M. Placement of iliosacral screws using 3D image-guided (Oarm) technology and stealth navigation: comparison with traditional fluoroscopy. Bone Joint J. 2016. p. 696–702.
27.
Mosheiff R, Liebergall M. Maneuvering the retrograde medullary screw in pubic ramus fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2002. p. 594–6.
28.
Rommens P, Hofmann A. Comprehensive classification of fragility fractures of the pelvic ring: Recommendations for surgical treatment. Injury. 2013. p. 1733–44.
29.
Rommens P, Arand C, Hofmann A, Wagner D. When and how to operate fragility fractures of the pelvis? Indian J Orthop. 2019. p. 128–37.
30.
Wagner D, Ossendorf C, Gruszka D, Hofmann A, Rommens P. Fragility fractures of the sacrum: how to identify and when to treat surgically? Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2015. p. 349–62.
31.
Vergari A, Frassanito L, Tamburello E, Nestorini R, Sala F, Lais G, et al. Supra-inguinal fascia iliaca compartment block for postoperative analgesia after Acetabular fracture surgery. Injury. 2020. p. 30801–9.
32.
Thakkar S, Sirisreetreerux N, Carrino J, Shafiq B, Hasenboehler E. 2D versus 3D fluoroscopybased navigation in posterior pelvic fixation: review of the literature on current technology. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2017. p. 69–76.
33.
Falzarano G, Rollo G, Bisaccia M, Pace V, Lanzetti R, Garcia-Prieto E, et al. Percutaneous screws CT guided to fix sacroiliac joint in tile C pelvic injury. Outcomes at 5 years of follow-up. SICOT J. 2018. p. 52.
34.
Kaiser S, Gardner M, Liu J, Routt M, Jr, Morshed S. Anatomic determinants of sacral dysmorphism and implications for safe iliosacral screw placement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014. p. 120.
35.
Miller A, Routt M. Variations in sacral morphology and implications for iliosacral screw fixation. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2012. p. 8–16.
36.
Michela F, Capasso L, Olivi A, Vitiello C, Liuzza L, F. D -navigated percutaneous screw fixation of pelvic ring injuries -a pilot study. Injury. 2020. p. 28–33.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
,
