×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Review paper

Scrotal trauma: interest of preoperative ultrasound in the prediction of the rupture of the tunica albuginea

By
Stefano Manno Orcid logo ,
Stefano Manno
Contact Stefano Manno

Urology Unit, “Pugliese-Ciaccio” Hospital of Catanzaro , Catanzaro , Italy

Urology Unit “Magna Graecia” , University of Catanzaro , Catanzaro , Italy

Antonio Cicione ,
Antonio Cicione

Department of Urology, University Hospital “Ospedale Sant’Andrea” , Rome , Italy

Lorenzo Bagalà ,
Lorenzo Bagalà

Urology Unit , “Magna Graecia” University of Catanzaro , Catanzaro , Italy

Antonio Catricalà ,
Antonio Catricalà

Urology Unit, “Pugliese-Ciaccio” Hospital of Catanzaro , Catanzaro , Italy

Piero Ronchi ,
Piero Ronchi

Department of Urology, University Hospital “Ospedale Riuniti” , Ancona , Italy

Simona Tiburzi ,
Simona Tiburzi

Department of Anaesthesia, “Pugliese-Ciaccio” Hospital , Catanzaro , Italy

Carolina Giannace ,
Carolina Giannace

Public Health Institute, Section of Forensic Medicine, University ”Cattolica del Sacro Cuore” , Rome , Italy

Lucio Dell’Atti
Lucio Dell’Atti

Department of Urology, University Hospital “Ospedale Riuniti” , Ancona , Italy

Abstract

Aim
Scrotal bruises are quite frequent injuries affecting young subjects, with psychological repercussions on body image and fertility. The interest of ultrasound in the context of the emergency remains controversial. The aim of our study was to investigate clinical, ultrasonographic and operative features of scrotal contusions, and to evaluate the contribution of ultrasound in the description of traumatic lesions.
Methods
In this retrospective and descriptive study 71 scrotal contusions operated from December 2015 to April 2020 were collected. We retrospectively analysed 26 patients (aged between 14 and 79 years) of 71 who sustained a scrotal ultrasound, where the latter was positive. The primary endpoint was albuginea rupture, whose concordance between ultrasound and surgery was assessed using the Kappa method. Positive and negative predictive values, sensitivity and specificity for the presence of albuginea rupture were evaluated for a set of ultrasound data: scrotal haematoma, haematocele, regularity of testicular contours, testicular fracture (specificity (93%), testicular haematoma, and Doppler signal intensity.
Results
Surgical treatment was necessary in 26 (37%) patients; only six orchiectomy were performed. Surgical exploration should
be performed if haematocele is found in the genital examination without any ultrasound complement.
Conclusion
The ultrasonography is useful, detailed and accurate when the haematocele is not clinically evident. 

References

1.
Jeffrey R, Laing F, Hricak H, Mcaninch J. Sonography of testicular trauma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1983;993–5.
2.
Nicola R, Carson N, Dogra V. Imaging of traumatic injuries to the scrotum and penis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014;512–20.
3.
Randhawa H, Blankstein U, Davies T. Scrotal trauma: A case report and review of the literature. Can Urol Assoc J. 2019;(6):67–71.
4.
Learch T, Hansch L, Ralls P. Sonography in patients with gunshot wounds of the scrotum: imaging findings and their value. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;(4):879–83.
5.
Buckley J, Mcaninch J. Use of ultrasonography for the diagnosis of testicular injuries in blunt scrotal trauma. J Urol. 2006;175–8.
6.
Guichard G, Ammari E, J, Coro D, Cellarier C, Loock D, et al. Accuracy of ultrasonography in diagnosis of testicular rupture after blunt scrotal trauma. Urology. 2008;52–6.
7.
Bhatt S, Dogra V. Role of US in testicular and scrotal trauma. Radiographics. 2008;1617–29.
8.
Isidori A, Pozza C, Gianfrilli D, Giannetta E, Lemma A, Pofi R, et al. Differential diagnosis of nonpalpable testicular lesions: qualitative and quantitative contrast-enhanced US of benign and malignant testicular tumors. Radiology. 2014;606–18.
9.
Ronchi P, Manno S, Dell’atti L. Technology meets tradition: CO 2 laser circumcision versus conventional surgical technique. Res Rep Urol. 2020;255–60.
10.
Bryk D, Zhao L. Guideline of guidelines: a review of urological trauma guidelines. BJU Int. 2016;226–34.
11.
Brandes S, Buckman R, Chelsky M, Hanno P. External genitalia gunshot wounds: a ten-year experience with fifty-six cases. J Trauma. 1995;266–71.
12.
Monga M, Hellstrom W. Testicular Trauma. Adolesc Med. 1996;(1):141–8.
13.
Frauscher F, Klauser A, Stenzl A, Helweg G. Amort B, zur Nedden D. US findings in the scrotum of extreme mountain bikers. Radiology. 2001;427–31.
14.
Lawson J, Rotem T, Wilson S. Catastrophic injuries to the eyes and testicles in footballers. Med J Aust. 1995;242–4.
15.
Koraitim AAI, M. Lower genitourinary trauma in modern warfare: the experience from civil violence in Iraq. Injury. 2014;885–9.
16.
Nagarajan V, Pranikoff K, Imahori S, Rabinowitz R. Traumatic dislocation of testis. Urology. 1983;521–4.
17.
Cass A, Luxenberg M. Testicular injuries. Urology. 1991;528–30.
18.
Wang Z, Yang J, Huang Y, Wang L, Liu L, Wei Y, et al. Diagnosis and management of testicular rupture after blunt scrotal trauma: a literature review. Int Urol Nephrol. 2016;1967–76.
19.
Andipa E, Liberopoulos K, Asvestis C. Magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound evaluation of penile and testicular masses. World J Urol. 2004;382–91.
20.
Lee S, Bak C, Choi M, Lee H, Lee M, Yoon S. Trauma to male genital organs: a 10-year review of 156 patients, including 118 treated by surgery. BJU Int. 2008;211–5.
21.
Muglia V, Tucci S, Jr E, Jr, Trad C, Bilbey J, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of scrotal diseases: when it makes the difference. 2002;419–23.
22.
Manno S, Cicione A, Dell’atti L, Td G. Amazing result of Nivolumab in a patient with multiple carcinomas. J BUON. 2019;865–7.
23.
Powers R, Hurley S, Park E, Mcardle B, Vidal P, Psutka S, et al. Usefulness of preoperative ultrasound for the evaluation of testicular rupture in the setting of scrotal gunshot wounds. J Urol. 2018;1546–51.
24.
Churukanti G, Kim A, Rich D, Schuyler K, Lavien G, Stein D, et al. Role of ultrasonography for testicular injuries in penetrating scrotal trauma. Urology. 2016;208–12.

Citation

Authors retain copyright. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Creative Commons License

 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.