Aim To investigate epidemiological characteristics of the measles epidemic (risk factors and reasons for its emergence) in order to establish better control and prevention of future epidemics as well as to determine an influence of poor collective immunization of children against measles on appearance of epidemic disease. Methods An open retrospective epidemiological study of measles infection was conducted during the epidemic in Zenica-Doboj Canton (ZDC) in the period 2014-2015. Disease reports, Disease Reporting Forms for measles and rubella cases and the Bulletin of the Institute for Health and Food Safety Zenica were used for data collection. Results A total of 325 patients with the diagnosis of measles were registered, 262 (80.61%) in 2014 and 63 (19.39%) in 2015 resulting in overall incidence of 81.25/100.000. The majority of patients were aged 0-6 (p <0.05). Of the total number of patients, only 13 (4.73%) were orderly vaccinated (p <0.05). In the period 2009-2015 in ZDC 25.444 (83.34%) children (p <0.05) were vaccinated with measles, mumps, rubella (MMR) vaccine. Conclusion Results of the study show that the low level of vaccination of children continues to a risk of the emergence of epidemics of measles and other infectious diseases. Therefore, in order to prevent the disease there is a need for a better vaccination campaign.
Rota P, Moss W, Takeda M, De Swart R, Thompson K, Goodson J, et al. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016. p. 16049.
3.
Global measles control and regional elimination 1998-1999. Morb Mortal Wekly Rep. 1999. p. 1124–30.
4.
Muscat M, Mamou B, Shefer M, Jankovic A, Deshevoy D, Butler S, et al. The state of measles and rubella in the WHO European region. Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2015. p. 345–51.
5.
Safdar N, Abad C. The reemergence of measles. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2015. p. 51.
6.
Williams G, Bacci S, Shadwick R, Tillmann T, Rechel B, Noori T, et al. Measles among migrants in the European union and the European economic area. Scand J Public Health. 2016. p. 6–13.
7.
Griffin D. Measles virus and the nervous system. Handb Clin Neurol. 2014. p. 577–90.
8.
Shanks G, Waller M, Briem H, Gottfredsson M. Age-specific measles mortality during the late 19 th early 20 th centuries. Epidemiol Infect. 2015. p. 3434–41.
9.
Godson J, Seward J. Measles 50 years after use of measles. Vaccine Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2015. p. 725–43.
10.
Aaby P, Martins C, Ravn H, Rodrigues A, Whittle H, Benn C. Is early measles vaccination better than later measles vaccination? Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2015. p. 16–28.
11.
Zahoor M, Rasool M, Waseem M, Aslam B, Zahoor M, Saqalein M, et al. Prevalence of measles in vaccinated and non-vaccinated children. EXCLI J. 2015. p. 504–7.
12.
D’amelio E, Salemi S, Amelio D, R. Anti-infectious human vaccination in historical perspective. Int Rev Immunol. 2015. p. 260–90.
13.
Jacobson R, Sauver S, J, Rutten F, Vaccine L, Hesitancy. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015. p. 1562–8.
14.
Manoj S, Mukherjee A, Kumar H, Kvs. Subacute sclerosing panencephalitis presenting with hypersexual behavior. Indian J Psychiatry. 2015. p. 321–2.
15.
Zavod za javno zdravstvo FBiH. Vodič za nadzor nad morbilima. 2014.
16.
Zavod za javno zdravstvo FBiH. Zarazne bolesti u FBiH. 2015.
17.
Crna gora institut za javno zdravlje. Obolijevanje od malih boginja (morbila) u Crnoj Gori. 14AD.
18.
Obradovic Z, Balta S, Obradovic A, Mesic S. The impact of war on vaccine preventable diseases. Mater Sociomed. 2014. p. 382–4.
19.
O’connor P, Jankovic D, Muscat M, Ben-Mamou M, Reef S, Papania M, et al. Measles and rubella elimination in the WHO Region for Europe: progress and challenges. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2017. p. 504–10.
20.
Feldstein L, Mariat S, Gacic-Dobo M, Diallo M, Conklin L, Wallace A. Global routine vaccination coverage. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016. p. 1252–5.
21.
Lancella L, Camillo D, Vittucci C, Boccuzzi A, Bozzola E, Villani E, et al. Measles lessons in an antivaccination era: public health is a social duty, not a political option. Ital J Pediatr. 2017. p. 102.
22.
Bester J. Measles and Measles Vaccination: A Review. JAMA Pediatr. 2016. p. 1209–15.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.