Aim To investigate anthropometric characteristics and traffic accident circumstances of subjects with isolated whiplash injury. Methods This cross sectional study involved 75 subjects from traffic accidents with isolated whiplash injury classified by Quebec Task Force (QTF). Anthropometric data were collected as well as claims about circumstances of traffic accidents. Results Distribution of 1 st (28; 37.3%), 2 nd (25; 33.3%) and 3 rd (22; 29.3%) grade of whiplash injury was almost equal. Females had smaller anthropometric measurements than males; neck circumference was the most significant difference between males and females in the context of whiplash injury. The most frequent collision mechanism was impact to front (26; 34.7%) or to rear end (26; 34.7%) of a small passenger's car. Assertions of participants were that their car damage was significant (37; 49.2%) or total (24; 32%). A total of 38 (50.7%) participants claimed that they were not wearing safety belt and 52 (69.3%) did not find themselves responsible for accident. Conclusion Driving habits of our participants facilitate incidence of whiplash injuries, especially in vulnerable groups such as women and elderly.
Wong J, Côté P, Shearer H, Carroll L, Yu H, Varatharajan S, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of conditions related to traffic collisions: a systematic review by the OPTIMa Collaboration. Disabil Rehabil. 2015. p. 471–89.
2.
Crowe H. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Western Orthopedic Association. 1928.
3.
Davis A. Injuries of the cervical spine. JAMA. 1945. p. 149–56.
4.
Gay J, Abbott K. Common whiplash injury of the neck. JAMA. 1953. p. 1698–704.
5.
De Pauw R, Coppieters I, Kregel J, Meulemeester D, Danneels K, Cagnie L, et al. Does muscle morphology change in chronic neck pain patients? -A systematic review. Man Ther. 2016. p. 42–9.
6.
Styrke J, Stålnacke B, Bylund P, Sojka P. Björnstig U. A 10-year incidence of acute whiplash injuries after road traffic crashes in a defined population in northern Sweden. PM R. 2012. p. 739–47.
7.
Brijnath B, Bunzli S, Xia T, Singh N, Schattner P, Sterling C, et al. General practitioners knowledge and management of whiplash associated disorders and post-traumatic stress disorder: implications for. BMC Fam Pract. 2016. p. 82.
8.
Myrtveit S, Carstensen T, Kasch H, Ørnbøl E. Frostholm L. Initial healthcare and coping preferences are associated with outcome 1 year after whiplash trauma: a multicentre 1-year follow-up study. BMJ Open. 2015. p. 7239.
9.
Erbulut D. Biomechanics of neck injuries resulting from rear-end vehicle collisions. Turk Neurosurg. 2014. p. 466–70.
10.
Panjabi M, Cholewicki J, Nibu K, Grauer J, Babat L, Dvorak J. Mechanism of whiplash injury. Clin Biomech. 1998. p. 239–49.
11.
Grauer J, Panjabi M, Cholewicki J, Nibu K, Dvorak J. Whiplash produces an S-shaped curvature of the neck with hyperextension at lower levels. Spine. Phila; 1976. p. 2489–94.
12.
Elliott J, Walton D. How do we meet the challenge of whiplash? J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017. p. 444–6.
13.
Zhang X, Zhou Q. An energy-absorbing sliding seat for reducing neck injury risks in rear impact--analysis for prototype built. Traffic Inj Prev. 2016. p. 313–9.
14.
Walton D, Elliott J. An integrated model of chronic whiplash-associated disorder. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017. p. 462–71.
15.
Jull G. Whiplash continues its challenge. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2016. p. 815–7.
16.
Anonymous. Report of the Que-becTask Force on Spinal Disorders. Spine. Phila; 1976. p. 1–59.
17.
Linder A, Schick S, Hell W, Svensson M, Carlsson A, Lemmen P, et al. ADSEAT--adaptive seat to reduce neck injuries for female and male occupants. Accid Anal Prev. 2013. p. 334–43.
18.
Girotto D, Ledić D, Strenja-Linić I, Peharec S, Grubesić A. Clinical and medicolegal characteristics of neck injuries. Coll Antropol. 2011. p. 187–90.
19.
Myrtveit S, Carstensen T, Kasch H, Ørnbøl E. Frostholm L. Initial healthcare and coping preferences are associated with outcome 1 year after whiplash trauma: a multicentre 1-year follow-up study. BMJ Open. 2015. p. 7239.
20.
Tenenbaum A, Nordeman L, Sunnerhagen K, Gunnarsson R. Gender differences in care-seeking behavior and healthcare consumption immediately after whiplash trauma. PLoS One. 2017. p. 176328.
21.
Carstensen T, Frostholm L, Oernboel E, Kongsted A, Kasch H, Jensen T, et al. Are there gender differences in coping with neck pain following acute whiplash trauma? A 12-month follow-up study. Eur J Pain. 2012. p. 49–60.
22.
Crouch R, Whitewick R, Clancy M, Wright P. Thomas P. Whiplash associated disorder: incidence and natural history over the first month for patients presenting to a UK emergency department. Emerg Med J. 2006. p. 114–8.
23.
Matsumoto M, Ichihara D, Okada E, Chiba K, Toyama Y, Fujiwara H, et al. Cross-sectional area of the posterior extensor muscles of the cervical in whiplash injury patients versus healthy volunteers -10 year follow-up MR study. Injury. 2012. p. 912–6.
24.
Sterling M. A proposed new classification system for whiplash associated disorders--implications for assessment and management. Man Ther. 2004. p. 60–70.
25.
Rebbeck T, Leaver A, Bandong A, Kenardy J, Refshauge K, Connelly L, et al. Implementation of a guideline-based clinical pathway of care to improve health outcomes following whiplash injury (Whiplash ImPaCT): protocol of a randomised, controlled trial. J Physiother. 2016. p. 111.
26.
Croft A, Bagherian A, Mickelsen P, Wagner S. Comparing 2 whiplash grading systems to predict clinical outcomes. J Chiropr Med. 2016. p. 81–6.
27.
Vasavada A, Danaraj J, Siegmund G. Head and neck anthropometry, vertebral geometry and neck strength in height-matched men and women. J Biomech. 2008. p. 114–21.
28.
Carter P, Flannagan C, Reed M, Cunningham R, Rupp J. Comparing the effects of age, BMI and gender on severe injury (AIS 3+) in motor-vehicle crashes. Accid Anal Prev. 2014. p. 146–60.
29.
Versteegen G, Kingma J, Meijler W. ten Duis HJ. Neck sprain after motor vehicle accidents in drivers and passengers. Eur Spine J. 2000. p. 547–52.
30.
Lipovac K, Tešić M, Marić B, Đerić M. Self-reported and observed seat belt use -a case study: Bosnia and Herzegovina. Accid Anal Prev. 2015. p. 74–82.
31.
Crouch R, Whitewick R, Clancy M, Wright P. Thomas P. Whiplash associated disorder: incidence and natural history over the first month for patients presenting to a UK emergency department. Emerg Med J. 2006. p. 114–8.
32.
Kumar S, Ferrari R, Narayan Y, Jones T. The effect of seat belt use on the cervical electromyogram response to whiplash-type impacts. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2006. p. 115–25.
33.
Moon M, Yoon M, Park B, Park M. Age-related incidence of cervical spondylosis in residents of Jeju Island. Asian Spine J. 2016. p. 857–68.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
,
