,
Orthopaedic & Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Brawijaya, RSUD Prof. Dr. Saiful Anwar Malang, Malang, Indonesia
Orthopaedic & Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Brawijaya, RSUD Prof. Dr. Saiful Anwar Malang, Malang, Indonesia
Aim Congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia (CPT) is a rare, dysplastic condition causing significant disability in the lower limbs. A treatment aims to achieve long-lasting union, prevent limb length discrepancies, and prevent soft tissue lesions. Traditional surgery often yields satisfactory results, but amputation may be proposed in failed cases. This report presents a congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia and fibula, treated with the Paley cross-union protocol.
Methods A 15-month-old girl presented with a crook-ed right lower leg at the age of two months, history of a right lower leg fracture at the age of eight months, and pain when moving her leg. She had undergone an initial surgical procedure to maintain tibia alignment with K-Wire insertion and was cast at a private hospital.
Results The patient's physical examination showed a cast causing limited range of motion, but no tenderness or distal neurovascular issues. The Paley cross-union protocol was performed, involving anterior approach, curettage, and insertion of a titanium intramedullary elastic nail into the tibia. The fracture site area was covered with a meshed periosteum layer and filled with synthetic bone grafts. A long leg cast was performed after the procedure. An imaging examination post-cross-union protocol showed a good result.
Conclusion Cross-union for CPT represents a paradigm shift in the treatment of this horrible child disease. Given the promising result, the cross-union approach has to be regarded as a fresh criterion for treating CPT.
No specific funding was received for this study.
Authors retain copyright. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. 
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.