Ă—
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Original article

The comparison of erector spinae plane block and caudal block for postoperative analgesia in paediatric surgery - meta-analysis

By
Mahendratama Purnama Adhi Orcid logo ,
Mahendratama Purnama Adhi
Contact Mahendratama Purnama Adhi

Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Airlangga University/Dr. Soetomo General Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia

Rapto Hardian ,
Rapto Hardian

Department of Anaesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Lambung Mangkurat University/Ulin General Hospital, Banjarmasin, Indonesia

Arif Budiman Susatya ,
Arif Budiman Susatya

Department of Anaesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Lambung Mangkurat University/Ulin General Hospital, Banjarmasin, Indonesia

Elizeus Elizeus ,
Elizeus Elizeus

1Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Airlangga University/Dr. Soetomo General Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia

Arie Utariani
Arie Utariani

Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Airlangga University/Dr. Soetomo General Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia

Abstract

Aim To assess the efficacy of Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) compared to caudal block in reducing postoperative pain in paediatric surgery.
Methods An electronic literature search was conducted using the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Google Scholar databases, with data collected from January 2018 until September 2023. This meta-analysis includes English-language randomized controlled trials (RCTs) studies contrasting ESPB with caudal block in paediatric patients. The primary outcome was the 24-hour postoperative pain scores. The secondary outcome included the time to rescue analgesia, the number of patients requiring rescue analgesia, and the occurrence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and urinary retention.
Results Five RCTs with 295 samples were included. The results showed no significant difference between ESPB and caudal block in postoperative pain scores at 1st hour SMD (standardized mean difference)  of  -0.17 (95% CI -0.70, 0.36; I2=76%; p= 0.53), 2nd hour of SMD: -0.50 (95% CI -1.21, 0.21; I2=88%; p=0.17), 6th hour SMD -1.09 (95% CI -2.21, 0.03; I2=95%; p = 0.06), 12th hour SMD -0.77 (95% CI -1.75, 0.21; I2=93%; p=0.12), and the 24th hour SMD -0.13 (95% CI -0.39, 0.12;, I2=2%; p=0.30) were found. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the time first to rescue analgesia, the number of patients requiring analgesia rescue, PONV occurrence, and urinary retention.
Conclusion ESPB and caudal block showed equivalent analgesia efficacy and safety in paediatric surgery.

Citation

Funding Statement

No specific funding was received for this study.

Authors retain copyright. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Creative Commons License

 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.