Department of Cardiac Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Clinic for Cardiovascular Surgery, Clinical Centre of the University of Sarajevo,
Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
Department of Cardiac Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Clinic for Cardiovascular Surgery, Clinical Centre of the University of Sarajevo,
Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
Aim To assess a psychosocial impact of the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on health care workers and to quantify the size of depression symptoms, anxiety and stress levels. Methods This cross-sectional study used an anonymous online survey questionnaire as a research instrument and it included 114 health workers of all profiles from the Sarajevo Canton employed in private and public institutions. The research was voluntary, non-commercial and all participants provided an oral informed consent. Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21) questionnaire was used for assessing emotional status of depression, anxiety and stress. Results The mean age of participants was 40.5±8.44 years with male:female ratio of 0.28. Prevalence of depression was 46.5%, anxiety61.4%, and 36.9% stress. Age and gender had no effect on emotional status, but it was revealed that women achieved higher depression, anxiety and stress scores than men (without statistical significance). The most notable effect on the emotional state was found for direct or indirect contact with COVID-19 patients. Medical workers in direct contact with COVID-19 patients achieved greater depression (p=0.005), anxiety (p=0.001), stress (p=0.030) and total DASS-21 (p=0.003) scores. Conclusion High prevalence of health workers affected by various psychological ailments during the COVID-19 pandemic was found. This evidence underscores the need to address adverse effects of the pandemic on mental health of health care workers.
Maestro D, Šegalo S, Remić D, Pašalić A, Jogunčić A. COVID-19 pandemic: a challenge for healthcare professionals and assessment of anxiety symptoms. Journal of Health Sciences. 2020. p. 211–8.
2.
Sarajevo. Bosnia confirms its first case of coronavirus. N1 Sarajevo. 23AD.
3.
Worldometer, Bosnia, Herzegovina C. deaths -Worldometer. 23AD.
4.
Greenberg N, Docherty M, Gnanapragasam S, Wessely S. Managing mental health challenges faced by healthcare workers during covid-19 pandemic. BMJ. 2020. p. 368.
5.
Bohlken J, Schömig F, Lemke M, Pumberger M, Riedel-Heller S. COVID-19 pandemic: stress experience of healthcare workers -a short current review. Psychiatr Prax. 2020. p. 190–7.
6.
Blake H, Bermingham F, Johnson G, Tabner A. Mitigating the psychological impact of COVID-19 on healthcare workers: a digital learning package. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020. p. 2997.
7.
Heath C, Sommerfield A. von Ungern-Sternberg BS. Resilience strategies to manage psychological distress among healthcare workers during the CO-VID-19 pandemic: a narrative review. Anaesthesia. 2020. p. 1364–71.
8.
Liu S, Yang L, Zhang C, Xiang Y, Liu Z, Hu S, et al. Online mental health services in China during the COVID-19 outbreak. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020. p. 17–8.
9.
Lai J, Ma S, Wang Y, Cai Z, Hu J, Wei N, et al. Factors associated with mental health outcomes among health care workers exposed to corona virus disease. JAMA Netw Open. 2019.
10.
Lee A, Wong J, Mcalonan G, Cheung V, Cheung C, Sham P. Stress and psychological distress among SARS survivors 1 year after the outbreak. Can J Psychiatry. 2007. p. 233–40.
11.
Bennett J, Peladeau N, Leszcz M, Sadavoy J, Verhaeghe L, Steinberg R. The immediate psychological and occupational impact of the 2003 SARS outbreak in a teaching hospital. CMAJ. 2003. p. 1245–51.
12.
Chen Q, Liang M, Li Y, Guo J, Fei D, Wang L. Mental health care for medical staff in china during the COVID-19 outbreak. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020. p. 15-e16.
13.
Steinberg R, Chen J, Chue C, Chou P. Survey of stress reactions among health care workers involved with the SARS outbreak. Psychiatr Serv. 2004. p. 1055–7.
14.
Steinberg R, Peladeau N, Leszcz M, Sadavoy J, Verhaeghe L, Steinberg R. The immediate psychological and occupational impact of the 2003 SARS outbreak in a teaching hospital. CMAJ. 2003. p. 1245–51.
15.
Huang J, Han M, Luo T, Ren A, Zhou X. Mental health survey of 230 medical staff in a tertiary infectious disease hospital for COVID-19. Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi. 2020. p. 192–5.
16.
Mo Y, Deng L, Zhang L, Lang Q, Liao C, Wang N. Work stress among chinese nurses to support Wuhan for fighting against the COVID-19 epidemic. J Nurs Manag. p. 2–22.
17.
Ivezic E, Jaksic N, Jokic-Begic N, Surányi Z. Validation of Croatian adaptation of the depression anxiety and stress scales (DASS-21) in a clinical sample. In proceeding of 18th Psychology Days.
18.
Lovibondpf L, Sh. Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 1995. p. 335–43.
19.
Lovibond S, Lovibond P. Sydney: Psychology Foundation. 1995.
20.
Alshekaili M, Hassan W, Said A, N, Sulaimani A, Jayapal F, et al. Factors associated with mental health outcomes across healthcare settings in Oman during COVID-19: frontline versus non-frontline healthcare workers. BMJ Open. 2020. p. 42030.
21.
Talaee N, Varahram M, Jamaati H, Salimi A, Attarchi M, Dizaji K, et al. Stress and burnout in health care workers during CO-VID-19 pandemic: validation of a questionnaire. Z Gesundh Wiss. 2020. p. 1–6.
22.
Huang Y, Zhao N. Generalized anxiety disorder, depressive symptoms and sleep quality during CO-VID-19 outbreak in China: A web-based cross-sectional survey. Psychiatry Res. 2020. p. 1–19.
23.
Bohlken J, Schömig F, Lemke M, Pumberger M, Riedel-Heller S. COVID-19 pandemic: stress experience of healthcare workers -a short current review. Psychiatr Prax. 2020. p. 190–7.
24.
Luo M, Guo L, Yu M, Jiang W, Wang H. The psychological and mental impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on medical staff and general public -A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychiatry Res. 2020. p. 113190.
25.
Wang C, Pan R, Tan W, Xu Y, Ho L, C. Immediate psychological responses and associated factors during the initial stage of the covid-19 epidemic among the general population in china. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2020. p. 1729.
26.
Chew N, Lee G, Tan B, Jing M, Goh Y, Ngiam N, et al. A multinational, multicentre study on the psychological outcomes and associated physical symptoms amongst healthcare workers during COVID-19 outbreak. Brain Behav Immun. 2020. p. 559–65.
27.
Preti E, Mattei D, Perego V, Ferrari G, Mazzetti F, Taranto M, et al. The psychological impact of epidemic and pandemic outbreaks on healthcare workers: rapid review of the evidence. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2020. p. 43.
28.
Salopek-Žiha D, Hlavati M, Gvozdanović Z, Gašić M, Placento H, Jakić H, et al. Differences in distress and coping with the COVID-19 stressor in nurses and physicians. Psychiatr Danub. 2020. p. 287–93.
29.
Sandesh R, Shahid W, Dev K, Mandhan N, Shankar P, Shaikh A, et al. Impact of COVID-19 on the mental health of healthcare professionals in Pakistan. Cureus. 2020. p. 8974.
30.
Santamaría D, Ozamiz-Etxebarria M, N, Rodríguez R, I, Alboniga-Mayor J, et al. Psychological impact of COVID-19 on a sample of Spanish health professionals. Rev Psiquiatr Salud Ment (Engl Ed). 2021. p. 106–12.
31.
Jemal K, Deriba B, Geleta T, Tesema M, Awol M, Mengistu E, et al. Self-reported symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress among healthcare workers in ethiopia during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2021. p. 1363–73.
32.
Lai J, Ma S, Wang Y, Caiz, Hu J, Wei N, et al. Factors associated with mental health outcomes among health care workers exposed to coronavirus disease. JAMA Netw Open. 2019.
33.
Lu W, Wang H, Lin Y, Li L. Psychological status of medical workforce during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study. Psychiatry Res. 2020. p. 112936.
34.
Mental health and psychosocial considerations during the COVID-19 outbreak. World Health Organization; 18AD.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
,
