×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Review paper

Proenkefalin A and protachykinin in ischemic neurological complications after cardiac surgery

By
Milan Skitek ,
Milan Skitek
Contact Milan Skitek

Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Biochemistry, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia

Aleš Jerin
Aleš Jerin

Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Biochemistry, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia

Abstract

Aim
The evaluation of biomarkers of acute ischemic brain injury following surgical revascularization of the heart with the use of the heart-lung machine (cardiopulmonary bypass, CPB).
Methods
Twenty consecutive patients were divided into two groups: the first 10 patients received a potential neuroprotective human
recombinant erythropoietin, while the remaining 10 comprised the control group. Neurological complications were monitored by measuring serum concentrations of neuropeptide proenkephalin A (PENK-A) and protachykinin A (PTA) before and in the first 5 days after surgery, comparing the neurological outcome with MRI examinations.
Results
Both the erythropoietin-treated group and control group were comparable with a non-significant difference shown for the
postoperative concentrations of PENK-A and PTA. A comparison of serum concentrations of the biomarkers of 16 patients without brain ischemia and 4 patients with acute ischemia also displayed no significant differences, regardless of erythropoietin therapy.
Conclusion
In our pilot study the analysis of PENK-A and PTA serum concentrations might not be the strategy to enable the monitoring and evaluation of neuroprotective stroke treatment, but further studies are required to investigate its role in acute ischemic
brain injury.

References

1.
Selnes O, Mckhann G. Coronary artery bypass surgery and the brain. NEJM. 2001. p. 451–2.
2.
Roger V, Go A, Jones L, Adams D, Berry R, Brown J, et al. and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Hearth disease and stroke statistics-2011 update: a report from American Hearth Association. Circulation. 2011. p. 18–209.
3.
Maas M, Furie K. Molecular biomarkers in stroke diagnosis and prognosis. Biomark Med. 2009. p. 363–83.
4.
Herrmann M, Ehrenreich H. Brain derived proteins as markers of acute stroke: their relation to pathophysiology outcome prediction and neuroprotective drug monitoring. Restor Neurol and Neurosci. 2003. p. 177–90.
5.
Anand N, Stead L. Neuron-specific enolase as a marker for acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2005. p. 213–9.
6.
Dassan P, Keir G, Brown M. Criteria for a clinically informative serum biomarker in acute ischemic stroke: A review of S100B. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2009. p. 295–302.
7.
Bokesch P, Izykenova G, Justice J, Easley K, Dambinova S. NMDA receptor antibodies predict adverse neurological outcome after cardiac surgery in high-risk patients. Stroke. 2006. p. 1432–6.
8.
Weissman J, Khounteev G, Heath R, Dambinova S. NR2 antibodies: risk assessment of transient ischemic attack (TIA)/stroke in patients with history of isolated and multiple cerebrovascular events. J Neurol Sci. 2011. p. 97–102.
9.
Skitek M, Jerin A. N-methyl-D-aspartate-receptor antibodies, S100B protein, and neuron-specific enolase before and after cardiac surgery: association with ischemic brain injury and erythropoetin prophylaxis. Lab Medicine. 2013. p. 56–62.
10.
Doehner W, Haehling S, Suhr J, Ebner N, Schuster A, Nagel E, et al. Elevated plasma levels of neuropeptide proenkephalin a predict mortality and functional outcome in ischemic stroke. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012. p. 346–54.
11.
Ng L, Sandhu J, Narayan H, Quinn P, Squire I, Davies J, et al. Proenkephalin and prognosis after acute myocardial infarction. Am Coll Cardiol. 2014. p. 280–9.
12.
Ernst A, Suhr J, Kohrle J, Bergmann A. Detection of stable N-terminal protachykinin A immunoreactivity in human plasma and cerebrospinal fluid. Peptides. 2008. p. 1201–6.
13.
Laskowitz D, Kasner S, Saver J, Remmel K, Jauch E. Clinical usefulness of a biomarker-based diagnostic test for acute stroke the biomarker rapid assessment in ischemic injury (BRAIN) study. Stroke. 2009. p. 77–85.
14.
Whiteley W, Chong W, Sengupta A, Sandercock P. Blood markers for the prognosis of ischemic stroke a systematic review. Stroke. 2009. p. 380–9.
15.
Wang L, Zhang Z, Wang Y, Zhang R, Chopp M. Treatment of stroke with erythropoietin enhances neurogenesis and angiogenesis and improves neurological function in rats. Stroke. 2004. p. 1732–7.
16.
Xiong Y, Lee M, C. Erythropoietin improves brain mitochondrial function in rats after traumatic brain injury. Neurol Res. 2009. p. 496–502.
17.
Lakič N, Šurlan K, Jerin A, Meglič B, Curk N, Bunc M. Importance of erythropoietin in brain protection after cardiac surgery: a pilot study. Heart Surg Forum. 2010. p. 185–9.
18.
Barber P, Hach S, Tippett L, Ross L, Merry A, Milsom P. Cerebral ischemic lesions on diffusionweighted imaging are associated with neurocognitive decline after cardiac surgery. Stroke. 2008. p. 1427–33.
19.
Saenger A, Christenson R. Stroke Biomarkers: Progress and challenges for diagnosis, prognosis, differentiation, and treatment. Clin Chem. 2010. p. 21–33.
20.
Rodriguez-Yanez M, Sobrino T, Vazquez-Herrero F, Brea D, Blanco M, Leira R, et al. Early biomarkers of clinical-diffusion mismatch in acute ischemic stroke. 2011. p. 2813-U212.
21.
Cox C, Sharp F. RNA-based blood genomics as an investigative tool and prospective biomarker for ischemic stroke. Neurol Res. 2013. p. 457–64.
22.
Kuwashiro T, Ago T, Kamouchi M, Matsuo R, Hata J, Kuroda J, et al. Significance of plasma adiponectin for diagnosis, neurological severity and functional outcome in ischemic stroke -Research for Biomarkers in Ischemic Stroke (REBIOS). Metab-Clin Experim. 2014. p. 1093–103.

Citation

Authors retain copyright. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Creative Commons License

 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.