×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Review paper

Does odor and taste identification change during hyperemesis gravidarum?

By
Mehmet Yasar ,
Mehmet Yasar
Contact Mehmet Yasar

Department of Ear, Nose, and Throat, Kayseri Training and Research Hospital, Kayseri , Turkey

Mustafa Sagit ,
Mustafa Sagit

Department of Ear, Nose, and Throat, Kayseri Training and Research Hospital, Kayseri, Turkey

Semih Zeki Uludag ,
Semih Zeki Uludag

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erciyes University School of Medicine, Kayseri, Turkey

Ibrahim Ozcan
Ibrahim Ozcan

Department of Ear, Nose, and Throat, Kayseri Training and Research Hospital, Kayseri , Turkey

Abstract

Aim
To investigate a difference in odor and taste identification among pregnant women with hyperemesis gravidarum, those with healthy pregnancy and non-pregnant women.
Methods
This prospective, controlled study included 33 pregnant women with hyperemesis gravidarum, 33 healthy pregnant and 26
non-pregnant women. For all participants, rhinological examinations were performed. Odor and taste identification were performed by holding Sniffin Sticks test battery (Burghart, Wedel, Germany) in all participants.
Results
There was a statistically significant difference in results of odor identification tests among the groups (p=0.031). Rose odor
was selected as the most pleasant odor by the hyperemesis gravidarum group, 32 (96.9%). Orange odor was selected as the most pleasant odor by the healthy pregnant women, 33 (100%) whereas the banana odor was selected as the most pleasant odor by the healthy non-pregnant women, 10 (38.4%). In taste identification tests, there was a significant difference in total taste scores among the groups (p=0.003).
Conclusion
It is obvious that there is a need to evaluate odor thresholds and other parameters by detailed studies on odor perception
in the context of hyperemesis gravidarum. 

References

1.
Swallow B, Lindow S, Masson E, Hay D. Development of an instrument to measure nausea and vomiting in pregnancy. J Obstet Gynecol. 2002. p. 481–5.
2.
Cameron E. Pregnancy does not affect human olfactory detection thresholds. Chem Senses. 2014. p. 143–50.
3.
Nordin S, Broman D, Wulff M. Environmental odor intolerance in pregnant women. Physiol Behav. 2005. p. 175–9.
4.
Gold J, Romero J, Goodwin R, Macgibbon T, Mullin K, Fejzo P, et al. Posttraumatic stress symptoms following pregnancy complicated by hyperemesis gravidarum. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011. p. 1307–11.
5.
Veenendaal M, Van Abeelen A, Painter R, Van Der Post J, Roseboom T. Consequences of hyperemesis gravidarum for offspring: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2011. p. 1302–13.
6.
Tareen A, Baseer A, Jaffry H, Shafiq M. Thyroid hormone in hyperemesis gravidarum. J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995. p. 497–501.
7.
Mestman J. Hyperthyroidism in pregnancy. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 1998. p. 127–49.
8.
Frigo P, Lang C, Reisenberger K, Kölbl H, Hirschl A. Hyperemesis gravidarum associated with Helicobacter pylori seropositivity. Obstet Gynecol. 1998. p. 615–7.
9.
Nelson-Piercy C. Treatment of nausea and vomiting in pregnancy. When should it be treated and what can be safely taken? Drug Saf. 1998. p. 155–64.
10.
Fell D, Dodds L, Joseph K, Allen V, Butler B. Risk factors for hyperemesis gravidarum requiring hospital admission during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2006. p. 277–84.
11.
Rashid M, Rashid M, Malik F, Herath R. Hyperemesis gravidarum and fetal gender: a retrospective study. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012. p. 475–8.
12.
Nordin S, Broman D, Olofsson J, Wulff M. A longitudinal descriptive study of self-reported abnormal smell and taste perception in pregnant women. Chem Senses. 2004. p. 391–402.
13.
Flaxman S, Sherman P. Morning sickness: a mechanism for protecting mother and embryo. Q Rev Biol. 2000. p. 113–48.
14.
Sipiora M, Murtaugh M, Gregoire M, Duffy V. Bitter taste perception and severe vomitting in pregnancy. Physiol Behav. 2000. p. 259–67.
15.
Swallow B, Lindow S, Aye M, Masson E, Alasalvar C, Quantick P, et al. Smell perception during early pregnancy: no evidence of an adaptive mechanism. BJOG. 2005. p. 57–62.
16.
Cantoni P, Hudson R, Distel H. Changes in olfactory perception and dietry habits in the course of pregnancy: a questionnaire study. Chem Senses. 1999. p. 58.
17.
Ochsenbein-Kolble N, Mering V, Zimmermann R, Hummel R, T. Changes in olfactory function in pregnancy and postpartum. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007. p. 10–4.
18.
Cameron E. Measures of Human Olfactory Perception During Pregnancy. Chem Senses. 2007. p. 775–82.
19.
Laska M, Koch B, Heid B, Hudson R. Failure to demonstrate systematic changes in olfactory perception in the course of pregnancy: a longitudinal study. Chem Senses. 1996. p. 567–71.
20.
Kölble N, Hummel T, Mering V, Huch R, Huch A, R. Gustatory and olfactory function in the first trimester of pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2001. p. 179–83.
21.
Hummel T, Mering V, Huch R, Kölble R, N. BJOG. 2002. p. 1394–7.
22.
Simsek G, Muluk N, Arikan O, Dag O, Simsek Z, Dag Y, et al. Marked changes in olfactory perception during early pregnancy: a prospective case control study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014. p. 627–30.

Citation

Authors retain copyright. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Creative Commons License

 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.