×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Review paper

Spinal cord stimulation in chronic pain treatment – first experiences in Bosnia and Herzegovina

By
Tatjana Bućma Orcid logo ,
Tatjana Bućma
Contact Tatjana Bućma

Institute for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, ”Dr Miroslav Zotović” , Banjaluka , Bosnia and Herzegovina

School of Medicine, University of Banja Luka

Ostoja Savić ,
Ostoja Savić

University Clinical Center of Republic of Srpska , Banjaluka , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Tatjana Boškić ,
Tatjana Boškić

Institute for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, ”Dr Miroslav Zotović” , Banjaluka , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Lena Arambašić Topić ,
Lena Arambašić Topić

Institute for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, ”Dr. Miroslav Zotović” , Banjaluka , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Igor Sladojević ,
Igor Sladojević

School of Medicine, University of Banja Luka, University of Banja Luka , Banja Luka , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Snježana Novaković Bursać
Snježana Novaković Bursać

Institute for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation , ”Dr Miroslav Zotović” , Banjaluka , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Abstract

Aim
To describe results of spinal cord stimulation technique when the conventional multidisciplinary treatment of neuropathic or
mixed pain failed.
Methods
The research was conducted at the Institute for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation “Dr. Miroslav Zotović”, Banjaluka.
Ten patients, who had chronic pain resistant to other therapeutic options and a failed back surgery, were sent for an evaluation. Each patient underwent a 4-week evaluation by a team of medical specialists, phychologist and social workers. Additional diagnostic methods (MRI of the lumbosacral spine, electromyoneurography of lower extermities, congnitive assessment tests) were also performed to establish a proper indication for implantation of the system for spinal cord stimulation. Leads of a system for spinal cord stimulation were implanted percutaneously or surgically at
the epidural space. Functional outcome measures (visual analogue scale, Oswestry index, anxiety and depression scales) were taken before the implantation of the system and on several followups.
Results
Four patients did not meet critea for the inclusion in the study (two were not ready, two showed psychopathological symptoms). One patient had a percutaneous lead implant, but it was removed after six months due to paresthesia. The remaining five had surgicaly implanted epidural leads and showed significant improvement in pain control, Oswestry index had lower values, and all except one patient had improvement registered by anxiety and depression scales.
Conclusion
Short-term and long-term follow up showed a long lasting pain reduction and improvement of functionality in all patients.

References

1.
Corallo F, Salvo S, Cannistraci C, Lo Buono V, Cara M, Floridia D, et al. Chronic pain and spinal cord stimulation.
2.
Brinzeu A, Cuny E, Fontaine D, Mertens P, Luyet PP, Abeele C, et al. Spinal cord stimulation for chronic refractory pain: Long-term effectiveness and safety data from a multicentre registry. Eur J Pain. 2019;23:1031–44.
3.
North RB, Kidd DH, Farrokhi F, Piantadosi SA. Spinal cord stimulation versus repeated lumbosacral spine surgery for chronic pain: a randomized, controlled trial. Neurosurgery. 2005;56:98–107.
4.
Daniell O, O.L. Failed back surgery syndrome: a review article. Asian Spine J. 2018;12:372–9.
5.
Kumar K, Taylor RS, Jacques L, Eldabe S, Meglio M, Molet J, et al. The effects of spinal cord stimulation in neuropathic pain are sustained: a 24-month followup of the prospective randomized controlled multicenter trial of the effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation. Neurosurgery. 2008;63:762–70.
6.
Rigoard P, Desai MJ, North RB, Taylor RS, Annemans L, Greening C, et al. Spinal cord stimulation for predominant low back pain in failed back surgery syndrome: study protocol for an international multicenter randomized controlled trial (PROMISE study. Trials. 2013;14(376).
7.
Kljajević V. Montrealska procena kognicije: srpska verzija. Aktuelnosti iz neurologije, psihijatrije i graničnih područja. 2009;17:31–9.
8.
Delgado DA, Lambert BS, Boutris N, McCulloch PC, Robbins AB, Moreno MR, et al. Validation of Digital Visual Analog Scale Pain Scoring with a Traditional Paper-based Visual Analog Scale in adults. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2018;2:e088.
9.
Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry Disability Index. In: Spine (Phila Pa 1976. 2000. p. 2940–52.
10.
Beck AT, Epstein N, Brown G, Steer RA. An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: psychometric properties. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1988;56:893–7.
11.
Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, Mock J, Erbaugh J. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1961;4:561–71.
12.
Thomson S, Huygen F, Prangnell S, Andrés J, Baranidharan G, Belaïd H, et al. Appropriate referral and selection of patients with chronicpain for spinal cord stimulation: European consensus recommendations and e-health tool. Eur J Pain. 2020;24:1169–81.
13.
Gybels J, Erdine S, Maeyaert J, Meyerson B, Winkelmüller W, Augustinsson L, et al. A consensus statement prepared in Brussels 16-18 January 1998 by the following task force of the European Federation of IASP Chapters (EFIC. Eur J Pain. 1998;2:203–9.
14.
Stephens KA, Ward A. Patient selection for spinal cord stimulators: mental health perspective. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2014;18(398).
15.
Gould HM, D’Eon MS, Grinberg AM, Chakravarthy KV, Castellanos J, Rutledge T. Psychosocial characteristics of candidates for implantable pain devices: validation of an assessment model. Pain Manag. 2021;11:159–72.
16.
Blackburn DR, Romers CC, Copeland LA, Lynch W, Nguyen DD, Zeber JE, et al. Presurgical psychological assessments as correlates of effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain reduction. Neuromodulation. 2016;19:422–8.
17.
Billet B, Hanssens K, Coster O, Nagels W, Weiner RL, Wynendaele R, et al. Wireless high-frequency dorsal root ganglion stimulation for chronic low back pain: A pilot study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2018;62:1133–8.
18.
Blackburn D, Monte R, Zeber J, McIntyre R. Assessment of psychosocial screeners for spinal cord stimulation success. Practical Pain Mgmt. 2013;13:35–9.

Citation

Authors retain copyright. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Creative Commons License

 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.