Aim To illustrate the surgical treatment of relapses of traumatic peroneal tendons subluxation. Methods We came across a young woman, who sustained a sprain in her dominant ankle after a trauma; we noticed subluxation of the peroneal tendons during eversion and extension of the foot. She referred to a previous accident some years before with peroneal tendon subluxation treated by superior peroneal retinaculum (SPR) sutures with a synthetic braided absorbable material. We prescribed conventional radiography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and performed surgery: we removed scar tissue, reattached the retinaculum using suture anchors strengthening it with an acellular dermal matrix allograft patch. Results Periodic clinical follow-ups until 24 months were performed evaluating the stability of the ankle, checking the range of movement, and the Visual Analogic Scale (VAS) and American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Score (AOFAS) was administered. At the first check the subluxation was resolved and the ankle was stable. The VAS scale had the value of 0 at the 3-month follow-up maintained until the final check. Conclusion Relapsing traumatic peroneal tendons subluxation is rare, as well as the possibility of a re-intervention years later. This technique seems to guarantee an excellent result even in the long term, allowing resolution of pain and joint stability. In fact, the use of acellular dermal patch is an already commonly described technique for the augmentation in rotator cuff and hip capsular repair; no reports are available in literature in relation to the use of graft for the repair of the superior peroneal retinaculum.
Saragas N, Ferrao P, Mayet Z, Eshraghi H. Peroneal tendon dislocation/subluxation -Case series and review of the literature. Foot Ankle Surg. 2016. p. 125–302.
2.
Standring S, Gray’s Anatomy. Le basi anatomiche per la pratica clinica (The Anatomical Basis of Clinical Practice) [Italian] 40 th ed. Elsevier; 2008. p. 1416–7.
3.
Karlsson J, Eriksson B, Sward L. Recurrent dislocation of the peroneal tendons. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 1996. p. 242–6.
4.
Safran M, Malley O, Jr D, Fu F. Peroneal tendon subluxation in athletes: new exam technique, case reports, and review. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999. p. 487–92.
5.
Wang X, Rosenberg Z, Mechlin M, Schweitzer M. Normal variants and diseases of the peroneal tendons and superior peroneal retinaculum: MR imaging features. Radiographics. 2005. p. 587–602.
6.
Heckman D, Reddy S, Pedowitz D, Wapner K, Parekh S. Current concepts review: operative treatment for peroneal tendon disorders. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008. p. 404–18.
7.
Van Dijk P, Miller D, Calder J, Digiovanni C, Kennedy J, Kerkhoffs G, et al. The ESSKA-AFAS international consensus statement on peroneal tendon pathologies. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018. p. 3096–107.
8.
Wong-Chung J, Tucker A, Lynch-Wong M, Gibson D, ’longain O, D. The lateral malleolar bony fleck classified by size and pathoanatomy: The IOFAS classification. Foot Ankle Surg. 2018. p. 300–8.
9.
Bakker D, Schulte J, Meuffels D, Piscaer T. Non-operative treatment of peroneal tendon dislocations: A systematic review. J Orthop. 2019. p. 255–60.
10.
Cerrato R, Myerson M. Peroneal tendon tears, surgical management and its complications. Foot Ankle Clin. 2009. p. 299–312.
11.
Taljanovic M, Alcala J, Gimber L, Rieke J, Chilvers M, Latt L. High-resolution US and MR imaging of peroneal tendon injuries. Radiographics. 2015. p. 179–99.
12.
Kennedy J, Van Dijk P, Murawski C, Duke G, Newman H, Digiovanni C, et al. Functional outcomes after peroneal tendoscopy in the treatment of peroneal tendon disorders. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016. p. 1148–54.
13.
Oden R. Tendon injuries about the ankle resulting from skiing. Clin Orthop. 1987. p. 63–9.
14.
Mclennan J. Treatment of acute and chronic luxations of the peroneal tendons. Am J Sports Med. 1980. p. 432–6.
15.
Tan V, Lin S, Okereke E. Superior peroneal retinaculoplasty: a surgical technique for peroneal subluxation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003. p. 320–5.
16.
Guelfi M, Vega J, Malagelada F, Baduell A, Dalmau-Pastor M. Tendoscopic treatment of peroneal intrasheath subluxation: a new subgroup with superior peroneal retinaculum injury. Foot Ankle Int. 2018. p. 542–50.
17.
Nishimura A, Nakazora S, Ito N, Fukuda A, Kato K, Sudo A. Tendoscopic double-row suture bridge peroneal retinaculum repair for recurrent dislocation of peroneal tendons in the ankle. Arthrosc Tech. 2016. p. 441–6.
18.
Guillo S, Calder J. Treatment of recurring peroneal tendon subluxation in athletes: endoscopic repair of the retinaculum. Foot Ankle Clin. 2013. p. 293–300.
19.
Smith S, Camasta C, Cass A. A simplified technique for repair of recurrent peroneal tendon subluxation. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2009. p. 277–80.
20.
Zhenbo Z, Haifeng J, Huanting G, Feng L, C, Ming. Sliding fibular graft repair for the treatment of recurrent peroneal subluxation. Foot Ankle Int. 2014. p. 496–503.
21.
Wang C, Wang S, Lien S, Lin L. A new peroneal tendon rerouting method to treat recurrent dislocation of peroneal tendons. Am J Sports Med. 2009. p. 552–7.
22.
Boykin R, Ogunseinde B, Mcfeely E, Nasreddine A, Kocher M. Preliminary results of calcaneofibular ligament transfer for recurrent peroneal subluxation in children and adolescents. J Pediatr Orthop. 2010. p. 899–903.
23.
Gaulke R, Hildebrand F, Panzica M, Hüfner T, Krettek C. Modified rerouting procedure for failed peroneal tendon dislocation surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010. p. 1018–24.
24.
Hayes M, Patterson D. Experimental development of the graphic rating method. Psychological Bulletin. 1921. p. 98–9.
25.
Kitaoka H, Alexander I, Adelaar R, Nunley J, Myerson M, Sanders M. Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int. 1994. p. 349–53.
26.
Espinosa N, Maurer M. Peroneal tendon dislocation. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2015. p. 631–7.
27.
Clavert P, Warner J. Panacryl synovitis: fact or fiction? Arthroscopy. 2005. p. 200–3.
28.
Burger C, Kabir K, Rangger C, Mueller M, Minor T, Tolba R. Polylactide (LTS) causes less inflammation response than polydioxanone (PDS): a meniscus repair model in sheep. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2006. p. 695–705.
29.
Chen F, Liu X. Advancing biomaterials of human origin for tissue engineering. Prog Polym Sci. 2016. p. 86–168.
30.
Jones C, Snyder S. Massive irreparable rotator cuff tears: a solution that bridges the gap. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2015. p. 130–8.
31.
Coons D, Barber A, F. Tendon graft substitutesrotator cuff patches. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2006. p. 185–90.
32.
Cai YZ, Zhang C, Jin, Shen RL, Gu T, Lin PC, et al. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with graft augmentation of 3-dimensional biological collagen for moderate to large tears: a randomized controlled study. Am J Sports Medicine. 2018. p. 1424–31.
33.
Derwin K, Badylak S, Steinmann S, Iannotti J. Extracellular matrix scaffold devices for rotator cuff repair. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2010. p. 467–76.
34.
Chalmers P, Tashjian R. Patch augmentation in rotator cuff repair. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2020. p. 561–71.
35.
Jacobsen S, Guth J, Schimoler P, Kharlamov A, Giordano B, Miller M, et al. Biomechanical response to distraction of hip capsular reconstruction with human acellular dermal patch graft. Arthroscopy. 2020. p. 1337–42.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
,
