×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Review paper

Reamputation stumps below knee

By
Viktor I. Shevchuk ,
Viktor I. Shevchuk

Scientific Department, Research Institute of Rehabilitation of National Pirogov Memorial Medical University , Vinnytsia , Ukraine

Yurii O. Bezsmertnyi Orcid logo ,
Yurii O. Bezsmertnyi
Contact Yurii O. Bezsmertnyi

Scientific Department, Research Institute of Rehabilitation of National Pirogov Memorial Medical University , Vinnytsia , Ukraine

Yankai Jiang ,
Yankai Jiang

Scientific Department, Research Institute of Rehabilitation of National Pirogov Memorial Medical University , Vinnytsia , Ukraine

Halyna V. Bezsmertna ,
Halyna V. Bezsmertna

Scientific Department, Research Institute of Rehabilitation of National Pirogov Memorial Medical University , Vinnytsia , Ukraine

Tetyana V. Dovgalyuk
Tetyana V. Dovgalyuk

Scientific Department, Research Institute of Rehabilitation of National Pirogov Memorial Medical University , Vinnytsia , Ukraine

Abstract

Aim
To investigate rehabilitation outcomes of patients with malformed tibial stumps.
Methods
Observations included 421 patients with residual limb diseases and malformations (extensive inactive scars adhered to
the bone, excessively long or short stumps, bone filing, osteomyelitis of the stump, muscle attachment to the skin scar, excessive mobility and deviations of the fibula, improper filing). Four hundred and thirty-six (436) reconstructive surgeries were performed. A follow-up period was from 6 months to 15 years. Radiological, ultrasonic, tensometrical, and histological methods were used.
Results
Due to the frequent combination of several malformations and diseases in the same patient, non-free skin grafting with
displaced dermal-subcutaneous flaps, which cover rather large defects, was widely used. The surgeries were performed simultaneously and allowed for reconstruction without shortening the bone lever stump. Complications in the form of marginal necrosis were obtained in three (0.71%) patients. The improved technique of muscle grafting with the fixation of muscles to the bone provided an elastic stump covering the bone filing. The authors have developed original methods of surgery to create a bone block of the tibia, which make it possible to obtain painless, highly functional stumps using partial support and ensure long-term use of modern prosthesis designs in 100% of cases.
Conclusion
Non-free dermal plasty with cutaneous-subcutaneous flap is the method of choice for closing skin defects on the residual limb. Muscle-bone fixation permits to eliminate some residual limb defects and to form an elastic muscular residual limb with closed bone filaments. Synostosis formation in different ways considerably improves functional quality of the residual limb.

References

1.
Ahmed A, Bhatnagar S, Mishra S, Khurana D, Joshi S, Ahmad S. Prevalence of phantom limb pain, stumppain, and phantom limb sensation among the amputated cancer patients in India: a prospective, observational study. Indian J Palliat Care. 2017;24–35.
2.
Ahuja V, Thapa D, Ghai B. Strategies for prevention of lower limb post-amputationpain: A clinical narrative review. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2018;439–49.
3.
Allami M, Faraji E, Mohammadzadeh F, Soroush M. Chronic musculoskeletalpain, phantom sensation, phantom andstumppainin veterans with unilateral below-kneeamputation. Scand JPain. 2019;779–87.
4.
Bezsmertnyi Y, Shevchuk V, Bezsmertna H, Shevchuk S. Krovoobrashhenie v kul’te kosti pri razlichnyh sposobah amputacionnoj plastiki (Circulation in stump of bone at various methods of amputation plastics). Likarsʹka Sprava. 2018;(8):141–8.
5.
Bezsmertnyi Y, Shevchukvi, Grushko O, Tymchyk S, Bezsmertna H, Dzierżak R, et al. Proc. SPIE 10808, Photonics Applications in Astronomy, Communications, Industry, and High-Energy Physics Experiments 2018. 108083;
6.
Bosanquet D, Glasbey J, Stimpson A, Williams I, Twina C. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of perineural local anaesthetic catheters after major lower limb amputation. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015;241–9.
7.
Buch N, Qerama E, Finnerup B, Nikolajsen N, L. Neuromas and postamputation pain. Pain. 2020;147–55.
8.
Buchheit T, Hsia H, Cooter M, Shortell C, Kent M, Mcduffie M, et al. The impact of surgical amputation and valproic acid on pain and functional trajectory: results from the veterans integrated pain evaluation research (VIPER) randomized, double-blinded placebo-controlled trial. Pain Med. 2019;2004–17.
9.
Dumanian G, Potter B, Mioton L, Ko J, Cheesborough J, Souza J, et al. Targeted muscle reinnervation treats neuroma and phantompainin major limb amputees: a randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg. 2019;238–46.
10.
Gilmore C, Ilfeld B, Rosenow J, Li S, Desai M, Hunter C, et al. Percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation for the treatment of chronic neuropathic postamputation pain: a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Reg Anesth PainMed. 2019;637–45.
11.
Grubor P, Milicevic S, Grubor M, Meccariello L. Treatment of bone defects in war wounds: retrospective study. Med Arch. 2015;260–4.
12.
Rollo G, Falzarano G, Ronga M, Bisaccia M, Grubor P, Erasmo R, et al. Challenges in the management of floating knee injuries: results of treatment and outcomes of 224 consecutive cases in 10 years. Injury. 2019;(Suppl 4):30-S38.
13.
Tosun B, Selek O, Gok U, Tosun O. Medial gastrocnemius muscle flap for the reconstruction of unhealed amputation stumps. J Wound Care. 2017;504–7.
14.
Plucknette B, Krueger C, Rivera J, Wenke J. Combat-related bridge synostosis versus traditional transtibial amputation: comparison of military-specific outcomes. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2016;5–11.
15.
Taylor B, Poka A. Osteomyoplastic Transtibial Amputation: The Ertl technique. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2016;259–65.
16.
Weiss M. Amputacja fiziologiczna (Physiological amputation). 1972;

Citation

Authors retain copyright. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Creative Commons License

 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.