Aim To investigate marital adjustment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and factors affecting this. Methods A total of 32 patients diagnosed with Steinbrocker class 1-2 rheumatoid arthritis and 32 healthy individuals from a similar age group were included. Sociodemographic characteristics, the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), short–form 36(SF-36) and the dyadic adjustment scale (DAS) were evaluated in both groups. A visual analogue scale (VAS), the disease activity score 28 (DAS28) and a health assessment questionnaire (HAQ) were also investigated in the patient group. Results Mean ages were 46.5±9.2 years in the patient group and 47.7±8.1 in the control group (p=0.5). No significant difference was determined between the two groups in terms of sociodemographic characteristics. No statistically significant correlation was observed between erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), patient and physician global VAS, DAS28, HAQ and morning stiffness and DAS total score. Comparison of DAS subunits revealed a significant difference in dyadic satisfaction and affectional expression in the patient and control groups (p=0.046 and p=0.037). A statistically significant negative correlation was observed between duration of the disease and marital adjustment (p=0.01;r= -0.58). Conclusion Due to its progressive and prolonged course rheumatoid arthritis can also affect individuals’ social relationships besides restricted daily living activities. Activation of rheumatoid arthritis did not affect marital adjustment in this study, but adjustment decreased with duration of the disease.
Gabriel S. The epidemiology of rheumatoid arthritis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2001. p. 269–81.
2.
Rupp I, Boshuizen H, Jacobi C, Dinant H, Van Den Bos G. Impact of fatigue on health related quality of life in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2004. p. 578–85.
3.
Barker T, Pucket T. Rehabil Nurs. 2010. p. 75–9.
4.
Matcham F, Steer R, Hotopf S, M. The prevalence of depression in rheumatoid arthritis:a systematic review and metaanalysis. Rheumatology. 2013. p. 2136–48.
5.
Margaretten M, Julian L, Katz P, Yelin E. Depression in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: description, causes and mechanisms. Int J Clin Rheumtol. 2011. p. 617–62.
6.
Van Lankveld W, Naering G, Van Der Staak C, Van ’t Pad, Bosch P, De Putte V, et al. Stress caused by rheumatoid arthritis: relation among subjective stressors of the disease, disease status and well-being. J Behav Med. 1993. p. 309–21.
7.
Halford W, Kelly A, Markman H. The concept of a healthy marriage. Clinical Handbook of Marriage and Couple Intervention. John Wiley&Sons; 1997.
8.
Ryan S. Psychological effects of living with rheumatoid arthritis. Nurs Stand. 2014. p. 52–9.
9.
Largu A, Manciuc C, Vâţă A, Nicolau C, Prisacaru L, Ciubotaru F, et al. Dyadic adjustment in HIV sero-concordant and sero-discordant couples. Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi. 2012. p. 718–21.
10.
Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman A, Funovits J, Felson D, Bingham Co 3rd, et al. 2010 rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum. 2010. p. 2569–81.
11.
Hochberg M, Chang R, Dwosh I, Lindsey S, Pincus T, Wolfe F. The American College of Rheumatology 1991 revised criteria for the classification of global functional status in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis and Rheumatism. 1992. p. 498–502.
12.
Beck A, Ward C, Mendelson M, Mock J, Erbaugh J. An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry. 1961. p. 561–71.
13.
Ware J, Snow K, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 Health Survey Manual and Interpretation Guide. The Health Institute; 1993.
14.
Spanier G. Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family. 1976. p. 15–28.
15.
Fışıloğlu H, Demir A. Applicability of the dyadic adjustment scale for measurement scale for measurement of marital quality with Turkish couples. Eur J Psychol Asses. 2000. p. 214–8.
16.
Price D, Bush F, Long S, Harkins S. A comparison of pain measurement characteristics of mechanical visual analogue and simple numerical rating scales. Pain. 1994. p. 217–26.
17.
Prevoo M, Van’t Hof M, Kuper H, Van Leeuwen M, De Putte V, Lba, et al. Modified disease activity scores that include twentyeight-joint counts. Development and validation in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1995. p. 44–8.
18.
Küçükdeveci A, Şahin H, Ataman Ş, Griffiths B, Tennant A. Issue in cross-cultural validity: example from the adaptation, reliability, and validity testing of a Turkish version of thr Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire. Arthritis Rheum. 2004. p. 14–9.
19.
Prevoo M, Van ’t Hof M, Kuper H, Van Leeuwen M, De Putte V, Van Riel L, et al. Modified disease activity scores that include twenty-eight-joint counts. Development and validation in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1995. p. 44–8.
20.
Beck A. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1961. p. 561–71.
21.
Drossaers-Bakker K, Zwinderman A, Vlieland V, Van Zeben T, Vos D, Breedveld K, et al. Long-term outcome in rheumatoid arthritis: a simple algorithm of baseline parameters can predict radiographic damage, disability, and disease course at 12-year followup. Arthritis Rheum. 2002. p. 383–90.
22.
Mchorney C, Ware J, Lu J. III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care. 1994. p. 40–66.
23.
Önem R, Celik S, Oncu J, Tankaya O, Kolat U, Danısmant B, et al. Assessment of marital adjustment and sexuality in women with rheumatoid arthritis. Arch Rheumatol. 2014. p. 280–8.
24.
Reblin M, M, Uchino B. Social and Emotional Support and its Implication for Health. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2008. p. 201–5.
25.
Reese J, Somers T, Keefe F, Williams A, Lumley M. Pain and functioning of rheumatoid arthritis patients based on marital status: is a distressed marriage preferable to no marriage? J Pain. 2010. p. 958–64.
26.
Ruiterkamp W, Naring G, De Rooij G, D. Marital and sexual satisfaction in patients with RA and their spouses. Scand J Rheumatol. 2004. p. 405–8.
27.
Blake D, Maisiak R, Koplan A, Alarcon G, Brown S. Sexual dysfunction among patient with arthritis. Clin Rheumatol. 1988. p. 50–60.
28.
Holtzman S, Newth S, Delongis A. The role of social support in coping with daily pain among patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Health Psychol. 2004. p. 677–95.
29.
Gove W, Hughes M, Style C. Does marriage have positive effects on the psychological well-being of the individual? J Health Soc Behav. 1983. p. 122–31.
30.
Coombs R. Marital status and personal well-being: a literature review. Family Relations. 1999. p. 97–102.
31.
Rocher Schudlich D, Papp T, Cummings L, E. Relations between Spouses’ Depressive symptoms and marital conflict: a longitudinal investigation of the role of conflict resolution styles. J Fam Psychol. 2011. p. 531–40.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
