×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Review paper

Application of high viscosity bone cement in vertebroplasty for treatment of painful vertebral body fracture

By
Saša Rapan ,
Saša Rapan
Contact Saša Rapan

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Hospital Centre Osijek , Osijek , Croatia

Karin Krnić ,
Karin Krnić

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Hospital Centre Osijek , Osijek , Croatia

Vjeran Rapan ,
Vjeran Rapan

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Hospital Centre Osijek , Osijek , Croatia

Vjekoslav Kolarević
Vjekoslav Kolarević

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Hospital Centre Osijek , Osijek , Croatia

Abstract

Aim
To evaluate the effectiveness and complication of vertebroplasty with high viscosity cement (HVC).
Methods
The patients with intensive pain caused by a fractured vertebrae were treated by application of HVC into the vertebral
body, through unilateral transpedicular approach. The application was performed in 422 patients (221 were treated for osteoporosis and 201 for malignancy) on 846 vertebrae.
Results
Preoperative Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score was 8.35 and 2.21 (p<0.00001) 24 hours after surgery and 3 months later,
respectively. There was no serious intra- and post-surgery complication. By diascopy during the surgery in 121 (14.3%) vertebrae cement leakage from the fractured vertebral body was evidenced, which did not cause any aggravation of patients’ clinical status.
Conclusion
Vertebroplasty with HVC is a method that successfully combines all advantages of this method but it also minimizes the risk of extra-ossal cement leakage which makes it significantly safer for the surgeon and for the patient as well.

References

1.
Wuu C, Lin M, Yang S, Chen P, Shih T. Surgical removal of extravasated epidural and neuroforaminal polymethylmetacrylate after percutaneous vertebroplasty in the thoracic spine. Eur Spine J. 2007;326–31.
2.
Baroud G, Crookshank M, Bohner M. High-viscosity cement significantly enhances uniformity of cement filling in vertebroplasty: an experimental model and study on cement leakage. Spine. 2006;2562–8.
3.
Ryu K, Park C, Kim M, Kang J. Dose-dependent epidural leakage of PMMA after percutaneous vertebroplasty in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. J Neurosurg. 2002;56–61.
4.
Ryu K, Park C, Kim M, Kang J. Dose-dependent epidural leakage of polymethylmethacrylate after percutaneous vertebroplasty in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. J Neurosurg. 2002;56–61.
5.
Boger A, Wheeler K, Schenk B, Heini P. Clinical investigations of polymethylmethacrylate cement viscosity during vertebroplasty and related in vitro measurements. Eur Spine J. 2009;1272–8.
6.
Figuerendo N, Barra F, Moraes L, Rotta R, Casulari L. Percutaneous vertebroplasty: a comparison between the procedure using the traditional and the new side-opening cannula for osteoporotic vertebral fracture. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2009;377–81.
7.
Lin E, Ekholm S, Hiwatashi A, Westesson P. Vertebroplasty: cement leakage into the disc increase the risk of new fracture of adjacent vertebral body. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2004;175–80.
8.
Anselmetti G, Zoarski G, Manca A, Masala S, Eminefendic H, Russo F, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty and bone cement leakage: clinical experience with a new high-viscosity bone cement and delivery system for vertebral augmentation in benign and malignant compression fractures. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2008;937–47.
9.
Wang H, Jiang Z, Wang Z, Zhu J, Zhao H. Analysis of the complication and prevention on treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compressive fractures by percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP). Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2009;783–4.
10.
Koh Y, Han D, Cha J, Seong C, Kim J, Choi Y. Vertebroplasty: magnetic resonance findings related to cement leakage risk. Acta Radiol. 2007;315–20.
11.
Shapiro S, Abel T, Purvines S. Surgical removal of epidural and intradural PMMA extravasation complicating percutaneous vertebroplasty for an osteoporotic lumbar compression fracture. Case report. J Neurosurg. 2003;90–2.
12.
Kaufmann T, Trout A, Kallmes D. The effects of cement volume on clinical outcomes of percutaneous vertebroplasty. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;1933–7.
13.
Chen Y, Tn T, Chen W, Chen C, Lee T. Intradural cement leakage: a devastatingly rare complication of vertebroplasty. Spine. 2006;E379–82.
14.
Tsai T, Chen W, Lai P, Chen L, Niu C, Fu T, et al. Polymethylmethacrylate cement dislodgment foolowing percutaneous vertebroplasty: a case report. Spine. 2003;457–60.
15.
Chen J, Lee H, Shih J, St H. Combined extraforaminal anf intradiscal cement leakage following percutaneous vertebroplasty. Spine. 2007;358–62.
16.
Le B, Lee S, Yoo T. Paraplegia as a complication of percutaneous vertebroplasty with PMMA: a case report. Spine. 2002;419–22.
17.
Cotten A, Dewatre F, Cortet B, Cotton A, Dewatre F, Quartet B. Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteolytic metastases and myeloma: effects of the percentage of lesion filling and the leakage of methyl methacrylate at clinical follow-up. Radiology. 1996;525–30.
18.
Barragan-Campos H, Jn V, Lo D, Cormier E, Jean B, Rose M, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty for spinal matastases: complications. Radiology. 2006;354–62.
19.
Aplikacija visokoviskoznog koštanog cementa u vertebroplastici u liječenju bolnog prijeloma trupa kralješka Saša Rapan, Karin Krnić, Vjeran Rapan. Vjekoslav Kolarević Medicinski fakultet Osijek.
20.
Metode Pacijenti s jakom boli zbog prijeloma trupa kralješka liječeni su aplikacijom visokoviskoznog cementa (HVC) u trup kralješka unilateralnim transpedikularnim pristupom. Cement je apliciran kod 422 pacijenta.
21.
Prijeoperacijski R, Vas. 24 sata, odnosno 3 mjeseca nakon operacije. Nije bilo ozbiljnijih intraoperacijskih i poslijeoperacijskih komplikacija. Dijaskopijom je, za vrijeme operacijskog zahvata, u 121 kralješku (14,3%) uočeno istjecanje cementa koje nije utjecalo na promjenu kliničkog statusa pacijenta.
22.
Aj E, Jensen M, Kip K, Nardo D, A, Gj L, et al. Vertebral compression fractures: pain reduction and improvement in functional mobility after percutaneous PMMA vertebroplasty retrospective report of 245 cases. Radiology. 2003;366–72.
23.
Longo U, Loppini M, Denaro L, Maffulli N, Denaro V. Conservative management of patients with an osteoporotic vertebral fracture: a review of literature. J Bone Joint Surg. 2012;152–7.
24.
Anselmetti G, Corgnier A, Debernadi F, Regge D. Treatment of painful compression vertebral fractures with vertebroplasty: results and complications. Radiol Med. 2005;262–72.
25.
Cheung G, Chow E, Holden L, Vidmar M, Danjoux C, Yee A, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty in patients with intractable pain from osteoporotic or metastatic fractures: A prospective study using quality-of-life assessment. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2006;13–21.
26.
Voormolen M, Lohle P, Frnsen H, Juttmann J, De Waal Malefijt J, Lampmann L. Percutaneous vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: first short term results. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2003;1549–53.
27.
Fessl R, Roemer F, Bohndorf K. Pescutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: experiences and prospective clinical otcome in 26 consecutive patients with 50 vertebral fractures. Rofo. 2005;884–92.
28.
Hochmuth K, Proschek D, Schwarz W, Mack M, Kurth A, Vogl T. Percutaneous vertebroplasty in the therapy of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a critical review. Eur Radiol. 2006;998–1004.
29.
Afzal S, Dhar S, Vasavada N, Akbar S. Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic fractures. Pain Physician. 2007;559–63.
30.
Gill J, Kuper M, Chin P, Zhang Y, Schutt R. Comparing pain reduction following kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Pain Physician. 2007;583–90.
31.
Rapan S, Jovanovic S, Gulan G. Vertebroplasty for Vertebral compression fracture. Coll Antropoll. 2009;911–4.
32.
Kimi L, Kondo D. Osteoporotic compression vertebral fracture and vertebral augmentation. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2008;413–24.
33.
Pongsoipetch B. Pain reduction in patients with painful vertebral compression fractures undergoing percutaneous vertebroplasty. J Med Assoc Thai. 2007;479–84.
34.
Ali A, Barrow F, Luke T, K. Vertebroplasty: What is important and what is not. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 209AD;1835–9.
35.
Kim Y, Lee J, Park K, Yeom J, Jeong H, Park J, et al. Pulmonary cement embolism after percutaneous vertebroplasty in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: incidence, characteristics, and risk factors. Radiology. 2009;250–9.
36.
Lee M, Dumonski M, Cahill P, Stanley T, Park D, Singh K. Percutaneous treatment of vertebral compression fractures: a meta-analysis of complications. Spine. 2009;1228–32.
37.
Athreya S, Mathias N, Rogers P, Edwards R. Retrieval of cement embolus from inferior vena cava after percutaneous vertebroplasty. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2009;817–9.
38.
Anselmetti G, Manca A, Kanika K, Murphy K, Eminefendic H, Masala S, et al. Temperature measurement during polymerization of bone cement in percutaneous vertebroplasty: an in vivo study in humans. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2009;491–8.
39.
Mccormack H, Horne D, Sheather S. Clinical applications of visual analogue scales: a critical review. Psychol Med. 1988;1007–19.
40.
Folman Y, Shabat S. A comparision of two new tehnologies for percutaneous vertebral augmentation: confidence vertebroplasty vs sky kyphoplasty. Isr Med Assoc J. 2011;394–7.
41.
Barragan-Campos H, Jn V, Lo D, Cormier E, Jean B, Rose M, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty for spinal matastases: complications. Radiology. 2006;354–62.

Citation

Authors retain copyright. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Creative Commons License

 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.