×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Review paper

Radiological evaluation of lumbosacral spine for post discectomy segmental instability

By
Rasim Skomorac ,
Rasim Skomorac
Contact Rasim Skomorac

1 Department of Neurosurgery, Canton Hospital Zenica, Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Hakija Bečulić ,
Hakija Bečulić

Department of Neurosurgery, Canton Hospital Zenica, Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Jasmin Delić ,
Jasmin Delić

Department of Anatomy, School of Medicine Tuzla, Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Aldin Jusić
Aldin Jusić

Department of Neurosurgery, Canton Hospital Zenica, Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Abstract

Aim
To establish presence of segmental instability in patients operated with standard discectomy comparing measurement of
translation and rotation on postoperative functional radiographs of lumbosacral spine with reference values,and to explore difference between patients operated on one or two levels.
Methods
The study included 71 patients, who were operated due to herniated lumbar disc. They were divided into two groups operated on one level (group A) or two adjacent levels (group B). All patients had been imaged in a standing position with functional lateral radiography. Radiographic images were digitized and then computerized measurement of translation and rotation was made. Measurement data were compared between the groups and with reference values obtained in healthy adults.
Results
Standard lumbar discectomy leads to an increase in translation, however, it reached statistical significance only for L4/
L5 level and a decrease of rotation, which showed statistical significance for all samples, relative to the reference values. There was no statistically significant difference in the values of translation and rotation between the groups for corresponding levels, except for the value of the rotation for L4/L5 level as adjacent, unoperated level. Comparison of translation and rotation between the operated and adjacent levels did not show a statistically significant
difference. When it comes to comparing the measured and predicted translation, there was a statistically significant difference only at the L5/S1 as an unoperated level.
Conclusion
Standard discectomy does not lead to radiologically significant segmental instability, and two-level surgery has not
caused more pronounced signs of instability comparing to onelevel surgery

References

1.
Ferguson S. Spinal Disorders Fundamentals of Diagnosis and Treatment. 1 st ed. Springer-Verlag; 2008. p. 42–60.
2.
Leone A, Cassar-Pullicino, Vn, Guglielmi G, Bonomo L. Degenerative lumbar intervertebral instability:what is it and how does imaging contribute? Skeletal Radiol. 2009. p. 529–33.
3.
Nizard R, Wybier M, Laredo J. Radiologic assessment of lumbar intervertebral instability and degenerative spondylolisthesis. RadiolClin North Am. 2001. p. 55–71.
4.
Clinical Biomechanics of the Spine. 2 nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott. 1990. p. 23–45.
5.
Young D, Seung J, Dong J. Radiological and clinical outcome after simple discectomy of central massive lumbar disc herniation. J Korean Soc Spine Surg. 2010. p. 169–76.
6.
Iguchi T, Kanemura A, Kasahara K, Sato K, Kurihara A, Yoshiya S. Lumbar instability and clinical symptoms: which is the more critical factor for symptoms: sagittal translation or segment angulation? J Spinal Disord Tech. 2004. p. 284–90.
7.
Sato H, Kikuchi S. The natural history of radiographic instability of the lumbar spine. Spine. 1993. p. 2075–9.
8.
Padua R, Padua S, Romanini E, Padua D, Santis E. Ten-to 15-year outcome of surgery for lumbar disc herniation: radiographic instability and clinical findings. Eur Spine J. 1999. p. 70–4.
9.
Halldin K, Zoëga B, Kärrholm J, Lind B, Nyberg P. Is increased segmental motion early after lumbar discectomy related to poor clinical outcome 5 years later? IntOrthop. 2005. p. 260–4.
10.
Kanayama M, Hashimoto T, Shigenobu K, Oha F, Ishida T, Yamane S. Intraoperative biomechanical assessment of lumbar spinal instability: validation of radiographic parameters indicating anterior column support in lumbar spinal fusion. Spine. 2003. p. 2368–72.
11.
Zander T, Rohlmann A, Klockne C, Bergmann G. Influence of graded facetectomy and laminectomy on spinal biomechanics. Eur Spine J. 2003. p. 427–34.
12.
Tibrewal S, Pearcy M, Portek I, Spivey J. A prospective study of lumbar spinal movements before and after discectomy using biplanar radiography: correlation of clinical and radiographic findings. Spine. 1985. p. 455–60.
13.
Hou T, Tu K, Xu Y, Zhang W, Wang H, Wang D. Effect of partial discectomy on the stability of the lumbar spine. A study of kinematics. Chin Med J (Engl). 1990. p. 396–9.
14.
Goel V, Goyal S, Clark C. Kinematics of the whole lumbar spine: effect of discectomy. Spine. 1985. p. 543–54.

Citation

Authors retain copyright. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Creative Commons License

 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.