×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Review paper

Magnetic resonance morphometry of the lumbar spinal canal in Zenica - Doboj Canton in Bosnia and Herzegovina

By
Belma Jaganjac Orcid logo ,
Belma Jaganjac
Contact Belma Jaganjac

Department of Emergency Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Zenica, Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Department of Histology and Embryology, School of Medicine, University of Zenica, Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Amina Džidić-Krivić ,
Amina Džidić-Krivić

Department of Neurology, Cantonal Hospital Zenica, Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, University of Zenica, Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Hakija Bečulić ,
Hakija Bečulić

Department of Neurosurgery, Cantonal Hospital Zenica, Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Department of Anatomy, School of Medicine, University of Zenica, Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Armin Šljivo ,
Armin Šljivo

Department of Emergency Medicine, University Clinical Centre Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Emir Begagić ,
Emir Begagić

Department of General Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Zenica, Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Adis Šišić
Adis Šišić

Department of Emergency Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Zenica, Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Abstract

Aim
To investigate morphometric determinants of lumbar canal in patients treated in Cantonal Hospital Zenica, and their variation
according to gender.
Methods
Morphometry of lumbar spinal canal was assessed in 52 patients treated at the Department of Neurosurgery of Cantonal
Hospital Zenica in the period between September 2022 and November 2022. Data were collected retrospectively: anteroposterior and transverse diameter of lumbar vertebrae and intervertebral discs, as well as anteroposterior diameter of the spinal canal.
Results
Gender appeared to be an important morphometric determinant, since it significantly differed when it comes to lumbar vertebral anteroposterior and transverse diameter, being mostly larger in males.
Conclusion
This study increases anatomical knowledge of the vertebras and spinal canal of the lumbar region. Therefore, the measured dimensions of the lumbar vertebrae and spinal canal could be used as a baseline point for evaluation of patients presenting
with low back pain and potential spinal canal stenosis. 

References

1.
Wu A, March L, Zheng X, Huang J, Wang X, Zhao J, et al. Global low back pain prevalence and years lived with disability from 1990 to 2017: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Ann Transl Med. 2020. p. 299.
2.
Hartvigsen J, Hancock M, Kongsted A, Louw Q, Ferreira M, Genevay S, et al. Lancet Low Back Pain Series Working Group. What low back pain is and why we need to pay attention. Lancet. 2018. p. 2356–67.
3.
Schwill C. Rückenschmerzen in der Hausarztpraxis: Der spezifische Rückenschmerz (Back pain in the primary care setting: Specific back pain). Internist (Berl). p. 34–46.
4.
Kaydu A, Andan İ, Deniz M, Bilge H, Başol Ö. Examination of spinal canal anatomy with MRI measurements in lumbar disc herniation patients: an anesthesiologist viewpoint. Anesth Essays Res. 2021. p. 38–44.
5.
Peabody T, Das J, Anatomy, Back. StatPearls. 25AD.
6.
Katz J, Zimmerman Z, Mass H, Makhni M. Diagnosis and Management of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Review. JAMA. 2022. p. 1688–99.
7.
Bharadwaj U, Ben-Natan A, Huang J, Pedoia V, Chou D, Majumdar S, et al. Evaluation of 2 Novel Ratio-Based Metrics for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2022. p. 1530–8.
8.
Lee J, Kang K, Kim K, Kim Y, Chang T. Extent and characteristic of relationships in canal dimension and canal body ratio between cervical and lumbar spine. Sci Rep. 2021. p. 18471.
9.
Suk K, Kim K, Lee J, Lee S, Kim J, Kim J. Reevaluation of the Pavlov ratio in patients with cervical myelopathy. Clin Orthop Surg. 2009. p. 6–10.
10.
Yadav U, Singh V, Bhargava N, Srivastav K, Neyaz A, Phadke Z, et al. Lumbar Canal Diameter Evaluation by CT Morphometry-Study of Indian Population. Int J Spine Surg. 2020. p. 175–81.
11.
Alam M, Waqas M, Shallwani H, Javed G. Lumbar morphometry: a study of lumbar vertebrae from a Pakistani population using computed tomography scans. Asian Spine. 2014. p. 421–6.
12.
Wang T, Shih C. Morphometric variations of the lumbar vertebrae between Chinese and Indian adults. Acta Anat (Basel). 1992. p. 23–9.
13.
Chazono M, Tanaka T, Kumagae Y, Sai T, Marumo K. Ethnic differences in pedicle and bony spinal canal dimensions calculated from computed tomography of the cervical spine: a review of the Englishlanguage literature. Eur Spine J. 2012. p. 1451–8.
14.
El-Rakhawy M, El-Shahat AR, Labib I, Ehaz A. Lumbar vertebral canal stenosis: concept of morphometric and radiometric study of the human lumbar vertebral canal. Anatomy. 2010. p. 51–62.
15.
Amonoo-Kuofi H, Patel P, Fatani J. Transverse diameter of the lumbar spinal canal in normal adult Saudis. Acta Anat (Basel). 1990. p. 124–8.
16.
Postacchini F, Ripani M, Carpano S. Morphometry of the lumbar vertebrae. An anatomic study in two caucasoid ethnic groups. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983. p. 296–303.
17.
Eisenstein S. The morphometry and pathological anatomy of the lumbar spine in South African negroes and caucasoids with specific reference to spinal stenosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1977. p. 173–80.
18.
Tacar O, Demirant A, Nas K, Altindağ O. Morphology of the lumbar spinal canal in normal adult Turks. Yonsei Med J. 2003. p. 679–85.
19.
Qudsieh H, Al-Rawashdeh I, Daradkeh A, Abualnadi T, Tah A, B. Variation of Torg-Pavlov ratio with age, gender, vertebral level, dural sac area, and ethnicity in lumbar magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Imaging Sci. 2022. p. 53.
20.
Abbas J, Peled N, Hershkovitz I, Hamoud K. The role of vertebral morphometry in the pathogenesis of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Biomed Res Int. 2021. p. 7093745.
21.
Bajwa N, Toy J, Ahn N. Application of a correlation between the lumbar Torg ratio and the area of the spinal canal to predict lumbar stenosis: a study of 420 postmortem subjects. J OrthopTraumatol. 2013. p. 207–12.
22.
Lee J, Kang K, Kim K, Kim Y, Chang T. Extent and characteristic of relationships in canal dimension and canal body ratio between cervical and lumbar spine. Sci Rep. 2021. p. 18471.
23.
Parenteau C, Lau E, Campbell I, Courtney. Prevalence of spine degeneration diagnosis by type, age, gender, and obesity using Medicare data. Sci Rep. 2021. p. 5389.
24.
Akar E, Somay H. Comparative morphometric analysis of congenital and acquired lumbar spinal stenosis. J Clin Neurosci. 2019. p. 256–61.
25.
Akar E, Toprak F, Öğrenci A. The relationship between bone canal diameter and facet tropism in cases of lumbar spinal stenosis. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2022. p. 641–6.
26.
Bečulić H, Skomorac R, Jusić A. Impact of timing on surgical outcome in patients with cauda equina syndrome caused by lumbar disc herniation. Med Glas (Zenica). 2016. p. 136–41.
27.
Moon M, Choi W, Lim H, Lee S, Wi S. Pavlov’s ratio of the cervical spine in a Korean population: a comparative study by age in patients with minor trauma without neurologic symptoms. Clin Orthop Surg. 2021. p. 71–5.
28.
Kong L, Bai J, Zhang B, Shen Y, Tian D. Predictive factors of symptomatic lumbar canal stenosis in patients after surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2018. p. 483–8.
29.
Song K, Choi B, Kim S, Kim G, Kim Y, Song J. The relationship between spinal stenosis and neurological outcome in traumatic cervical spine injury: an analysis using Pavlov’s ratio, spinal cord area, and spinal canal area. Clin Orthop Surg. 2009. p. 11–8.

Citation

Authors retain copyright. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Creative Commons License

 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.