Aim To investigate the influence of the inclination and insertion of the cerebellar tentorium on the posterior cranial fossa (PCF) volume. Methods A retrospective, non-randomized study including 174 patients (117 females and 57 males) who underwent magnetic resonance imaging in the period from 31 December 2020 to 1 June 2021 under the indication (mostly headache) set by a competent ordinary. Acute or chronic intracranial events were not verified in the patients. Results The average value of the PCF volume was 138.93 cm3 and the slope of the tentorium was 44.15°. Comparing the volume of the PCF and the slope of the tentorium in males and females no significant difference was found. A correlation was found in the females age groups 18-24 and 45-54 years. Conclusion Understanding dimensions of the posterior cranial fossa morphometry has clear implications for reducing morbidity and mortality in surgery, especially in the case of applying lateral approaches and their variations.
Dagtekina A, Avci E, Kara E, Uzmansel D, Dagtekind O, Koseoglua A, et al. Bagda-toglua C. Posterior cranial fossa morphometry in symptomatic adult Chiari I malformation patients: Comparative clinical and anatomical study. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2011;399–403.
2.
Şeker A, Rhoton A. The Anatomy of the Posterior Cranial Fossa. 2015;
Carlos A, Luiz R, Andreza N, Augusto B, Lenine G. Anatomical study of jugular foramen in the neck. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2020;44–8.
5.
Adeeb N, Mortazavi M, Tubbs R, Cohen-Gadol A. The cranial dura mater: a review of its history, embryology, and anatomy. Child Nerv Syst. 2012;827–37.
6.
Klintworth G. The comparative anatomy and phylogeny of the tentorium cerebelli. Anat Rec. 1968;635–41.
7.
Kanodia G, Parihar V, Yadav R, Bhatele P. Sharma D. Morphometric analysis of posterior fossa and foramen magnum. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2012;261–6.
8.
Vurdem U, Acer N, Ertekin T, Savranlar A, Inci M. Analysis of the volumes of the posterior cranial fossa, cerebellum, and herniated tonsils using the stereological methods in patients with Chiari Type I malformation. ScientificWorld Journal. 2012;616934.
9.
Basaran R, Efendioglu M, Senol M, Ozdogan S, Isik N. Morphometric analysis of posterior fossa and craniovertebral junction in subtypes of Chiari malformation. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2018;1–11.
10.
Öksuzler M, Polat S, Ipek C, Goker P. The relationship of the posterior cranial fossa with age and sex. Int J Morphol. 2021;1371–82.
11.
Botelho R, Heringer L, Botelho P, Lopes R, Waisberg J. Posterior fossa dimensions of Chiari malformation patients compared with normal subjects: systematic review and metanalysis. World Neurosurgery. 2020;521–9.
12.
Badie B, Mendoza D, Batzdorf U. Posterior fossa volume and response to suboccipital decompression in patients with Chiari I malformation. Neurosurgery. 1995;214–8.
13.
Sgouros S, Kountouri M, Natarajan K. Posterior fossa volume in children with Chiari malformation Type I. Comment in J Neurosurg. 2006;329.
14.
Goel A, Bhatjiwale M, Desai K. Basilar invagination: A study based on 190 surgically treated patients. J Neurosurg. 1998;962–8.
15.
Trigylidas T, Baronia B, Vassilyadi M, Ventureyra E. Posterior fossa dimension and volume estimates in pediatric patients with Chiari I malformations. Childs Nerv Syst. 2008;329–36.
16.
Tubbs R, Hill M, Loukas M, Shoja M, Oakes W. Volumetric analysis of the posterior cranial fossa in a family with four generations of the Chiari malformation Type I. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2008;21–4.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.