×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Original article

Less invasive surfactant administration versus intubation-surfactant-extubation in preterm infants: a retrospective study

By
Gianluca Dini Orcid logo ,
Gianluca Dini
Contact Gianluca Dini

Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, “Santa Maria” Hospital, Terni, Italy

Maria Grazia Santini ,
Maria Grazia Santini

Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, “Santa Maria” Hospital, Terni, Italy

Federica Celi ,
Federica Celi

Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, “Santa Maria” Hospital, Terni, Italy

Alberto Verrotti
Alberto Verrotti

Department of Pediatrics, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy

Abstract

Aim To compare the need for intubation and mechanical ventilation after surfactant delivery between less invasive surfactant administration (LISA)-treated and intuba-tion-surfactant-extubation (IN-SURE)-treated premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). 
Methods Retrospective registry-based cohort study enrolled 36 newborns admitted to the Neo-natal Intensive Care Unit of the “Santa Maria” Hospital of Terni between 2016 and 2023. As a primary outcome, the need for intubation and mechanical ventilation within 72 hours of life was followed, and major neonatal morbidities and death before discharge as the secondary outcome. 
Results The LISA group and the IN-SURE group included 13 and 23 newborns, respectively. Demographic features showed no significant differences between the two groups. The need for mechanical ventilation in the first 72 hours of life was similar in both groups (p>0.99). There were no significant differences in morbidities. 
Conclusion LISA and INSURE are equally effective modalities for surfactant administration for the treatment of RDS in preterm infants.

Citation

Funding Statement

No specific funding was received for this study

Authors retain copyright. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Creative Commons License

 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.