×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Review paper

A one-year review of macrosomic births at the Cantonal Hospital Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina

By
Hana Štimjanin Orcid logo ,
Hana Štimjanin
Contact Hana Štimjanin

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Cantonal Hospital Zenica, Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Rasim Iriškić ,
Rasim Iriškić

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Cantonal Hospital Zenica, Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Jasmin Hodžić ,
Jasmin Hodžić

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Cantonal Hospital Zenica, Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Ena Štimjanin
Ena Štimjanin

Department of Internal Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Zenica, Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Abstract

Aim
To identify a rate of macrosomic births in a one-year review, associated maternal characteristics and pregnancy outcome.
Methods
This one-year retrospective review included all macrosomic deliveries at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
at the Cantonal Hospital Zenica between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2018. The data were collected from maternal and newborn medical records. A total of 361 singleton normal birth weight term newborns (birth weight < 4000 g, but not small for gestational age) who were delivered in the same period, represented the control group.
Results
Among the total of 2758 women who gave birth, 360 (13.05%) macrosomic infants (birth weight more than 4000 g)
were delivered. Mean birth weight was 4258.90 g (maximum 5460g); nine (0.33%) were >5000g. Male macrosomic infants
were more frequently represented, 245 (68,1%) comparing to the control group (p<0.01); in the control group female infants were more frequently represented (p<0.01). The overall Cesarean section rate, including elective Cesarean delivery was 23.2%, and 76.1% underwent an attempt of labour delivered vaginally.
Conclusion
Macrosomia represents a risk for adverse outcome for the mother and neonate, with a higher risk for the operative mode
of delivery.

References

1.
Anonymous. Practice Bulletin No 173. Fetal Macrosomia. Vol. 128, Obstet Gynecol. 2016. p. 1191–2.
2.
Vinturache AE, Chaput KH, Tough SC. Pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) and macrosomia in a Canadian birth cohort. Vol. 30, J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017. p. 109–16.
3.
Stotland NE, Caughey AB, Breed EM, Escobar GJ. Risk factors and obstetric complications associated with macrosomia. Vol. 87, Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2004. p. 220–6.
4.
E AJ, AB P, AC Z, J EJ, Macrosomia TG. Best Pract Clin Obstet Gynaecol. Vol. 38. 2017. p. 83–96.
5.
Fuchs F, Bouyer J, Rozenberg P, Senat MV. Adverse maternal outcome associated with fetal macrosomia: what are the risk factors beyond birthweight? Vol. 13, BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013.
6.
Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Hauth JC, Gilstrap LC, WenstormKD. Williams Obstetrics. Vol. 22. 2005.
7.
Henriksen T. The macrosomic fetus: a challenge in current obstetrics. Vol. 87, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008. p. 134–45.
8.
Das S, Irigoyen M, Patterson MB, Salvador A, Schutzman DL. Neonatal outcomes of macrosomic births in diabetic and non-diabetic women. Vol. 94:F419–22, Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal. 2009.
9.
Esakoff TF, Cheng YW, Sparks TN, Caughey AB. The association between birthweight 4000 g or greater and perinatal outcomes in patients with and without gestational diabetis mellitus. Vol. 200, Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009.
10.
Tomić V, Bosnjak K, Petrov B, Dikić M, Knezević D. Macrosomic births at Mostar Clinical Hospital: a 2-year review. Vol. 7, Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2007. p. 271–4.
11.
Boulet SL, Alexander GR, Salihu HM, Pass M. Macrosomic births in the United States: determinants, outcomes, and proposed grades of risk. Vol. 188, Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003. p. 1372–8.
12.
Said AS, Manji KP. Risk factors and outcomes of fetal macrosomia in a tertiary centre in Tanzania: a case-control study. Vol. 16, BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016.
13.
King K, LM M, DA O, J.G. Increased composite maternal and neonatal morbidity associated with ultrasonographically suspected fetal macrosomia. Vol. 25, J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012. p. 1953–9.
14.
Najafian M, Cheraghi M. Occurrence of fetal macrosomia rate and its maternal and neonatal complications: a 5-year cohort study. Vol. 2012, ISRN Obstet Gynecol. 2012.
15.
Mohammadbeigi A, Farhadifar F, Soufi Zadeh N, Mohammadsalehi N, Rezaiee M, Aghaei M. Fetal macrosomia: risk factors, maternal, and perinatal outcome. Vol. 3, Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2013. p. 546–50.

Citation

Authors retain copyright. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Creative Commons License

 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.