Aim To compare the prevalence of premature rupture of membranes (PROM) and preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) between adolescent and adult pregnancies, and the influence of gestational age and adolescent pregnancy on the frequency of occurrence of PROM and PPROM. Methods This prospective study included 300 pregnant patients, 13 to 35 years of age, divided into two groups. The first group consisted of 150 pregnant women aged 13-19 (experimental group) and the second group consisted of 150 pregnant women aged 20-35 (control group). Results There was a statistically significant higher incidence of both PPROM and PROM in the group of adolescent pregnant women compared to adult pregnant women (p<0.000001). Preterm delivery with PPROM was significantly more common in the group of adolescent pregnant women (p<0.004). Term delivery with PROM was statistically significantly more common in the adolescent pregnancy group than in the adult pregnancy group (p<0.001). Term delivery with PROM was statistically significantly more common than preterm delivery with PPROM in the group of adolescent pregnant women (p<0.0001). Conclusion Adolescent pregnancy has a greater impact on the frequency of PROM and PPROM.
Çetin A, B, Mathyk A, Turan B, Güralp G, Gedikbaşi O, et al. A comparison of obstetric outcomes in adolescent pregnancies and adult pregnancies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019. p. 1–6.
2.
Karai A, Gyurkovits Z, Nyári T, Sári T, Németh G, Orvos H. Adverse perinatal outcome in teenage pregnancies: an analysis of a 5 year period in Southeastern Hungary. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019. p. 2376–9.
3.
Nevačinović E, Cerovac A, Bogdanović G, Grgić G. Perinatal characteristics and prevalence of low birth weight infants in the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina: prospective multicentric study. Med Glas (Zenica). 2019. p. 92–7.
4.
Azevedo W, Diniz M, Fonseca E, Azevedo L, Evangelista C. Complications in adolescent pregnancy: systematic review of the literature. Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2015. p. 618–26.
5.
Goya M, Bernabeu A, García N, Plata J, Gonzalez F, Merced C, et al. Premature rupture of membranes before 34 weeks managed expectantly: maternal and perinatal outcomes in singletons. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013. p. 290–3.
6.
Fraser A, Brockert J, Ward R. Association of young maternal age with adverse reproductive outcomes. N Engl J Med. 1995. p. 1113–7.
7.
Assefa N, Berhe H, Girma F, Berhe K, Berhe Y, Gebreheat G, et al. Risk factors of premature rupture of membranes in public hospitals at Mekele city, Tigray, a case control study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018. p. 386.
8.
Renzo D, Roura G, Facchinetti L, Antsaklis F, Breborowicz A, Gratacos G, et al. Guidelines for the management of spontaneous preterm labor: identification of spontaneous preterm labor, diagnosis of preterm premature rupture of membranes, and preventive tools for preterm birth. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011. p. 659–67.
9.
Meller C, Carducci M, Cernadas C, Otaño J, L. Preterm premature rupture of membranes. Arch Argent Pediatr. 2018. p. 575–81.
10.
Schmitz T, Sentilhes L, Lorthe E, Gallot D, Madar H, Doret-Dion M, et al. Preterm premature rupture of the membranes: Guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019. p. 1–6.
11.
Ocviyanti D, Wahono W. Risk Factors for neonatal sepsis in pregnant women with premature rupture of the membrane. J Pregnancy. 2018. p. 4823404.
12.
Cerovac A, Grgić G, Ljuca D. Mode of delivery in preterm births-Bosnian and Herzegovinian experience. Mater Sociomed. 2018. p. 290–3.
13.
Fleming N, Ng N, Osborne C, Biederman S, Yasseen As 3rd, Dy J, et al. Adolescent pregnancy outcomes in the province of Ontario: a cohort study. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013. p. 234–45.
14.
Bildircin F, Kurtoglu E, Kokcu A, Işik Y, Ozkarci M, Kuruoglu S. Comparison of perinatal outcome between adolescent and adult pregnancies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014. p. 829–32.
15.
Gupta N, Kiran U, Bhal K. Teenage pregnancies: obstetric characteristics and outcome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008. p. 165–71.
16.
Liran D, Vardi I, Sergienko R, Sheiner E. Adverse perinatal outcome in teenage pregnancies: is it all due to lack of prenatal care and ethnicity? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013. p. 469–72.
17.
Mahavarkar S, Madhu C, Mule V. A comparative study of teenage pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008. p. 604–7.
18.
Soysal S, Sarioz A, Ilhan A, Kocagoz G, Dizi A, Gursoy A, et al. Evaluation of late adolescent pregnancies: Is late adolescence a risk factor for preterm labor? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019. p. 851–6.
19.
Ganchimeg T, Ota E, Morisaki N, Laopaiboon M, Lumbiganon P, Zhang J, et al. WHO Multicountry Survey on Maternal Newborn Health Research Network. Pregnancy and childbirth outcomes among adolescent mothers: a World Health Organization multicountry study. BJOG. 2014. p. 40–8.
20.
Orvos H, Nyirati I, Hajdú J, Pál A, Nyári T, Kovács L. Is adolescent pregnancy associated with adverse perinatal outcome? J Perinat Med. 1999. p. 199–203.
21.
Chen X, Wen S, Fleming N, Yang Q, Walker M. Teenage pregnancy and congenital anomalies: which system is vulnerable? Hum Reprod. 2007. p. 1730–5.
22.
Cerovac A, Šerak A, Zukić H, Nevačinović E, Dž L, Brigić A, et al. Ethical and legal dilemmas around termination of pregnancy for severe fetal hydrocephalus, spina bifida aperta and meningomyelocoella. Med Arch. 2019. p. 126–30.
23.
Eckmann-Scholz C, Kaisenberg V, Alkatout C, Jonat I, Rajabi-Wieckhorst W, A. Pathologic ultrasound findings and risk for congenital anomalies in teenage pregnancies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012. p. 1950–2.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
,
