×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Review paper

Bone marrow adiposity is inversely associated with bone mineral density in postmenopausal females

By
Lejla Milišić Orcid logo ,
Lejla Milišić
Contact Lejla Milišić

Clinic of Radiology, Clinical Centre of the University of Sarajevo , Sarajevo , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Sandra Vegar-Zubović ,
Sandra Vegar-Zubović

Clinic of Radiology, Clinical Centre of the University of Sarajevo , Sarajevo , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Amina Valjevac ,
Amina Valjevac

Department of Human Physiology, School of Medicine, University of Sarajevo , Sarajevo , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Suada Hasanović-Vučković
Suada Hasanović-Vučković

Clinic of Radiology, Clinical Centre of the University of Sarajevo , Sarajevo , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Abstract

Aim
To evaluate vertebral bone marrow adiposity (BMA) using magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) in postmenopausal women and to determine an association of bone density with bone marrow fat content.
Methods
This cross-sectional study included 120 postmenopausal women referred for osteoporosis screening. All women underwent assessment of bone mineral density by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), who were divided based on T scores into osteoporosis (OST; n=60) and control group (CG; n=60). MRS was used to measure fat fraction (FF), lipid/water ratio (LWR) and fat content (FC) at vertebral spine (L1-L4).
Results
Mean age, menopause or reproductive period duration was not significantly different between women in OST and control group. Median LWR in OST group was significantly higher compared to CG, 31.5 (22.9-38.8) vs. 28.7 (13.7-37.3) (p=0.039). Median FC was significantly higher in OST compared to the control group, 47.0 (46.3-78.8) and 46.4 (44.3-48.6), respectively (p=0.011). FC was significantly negatively associated with BMD at lumbar spine (Rho=-0.042; p<0.001) and with BMD at hip (Rho=-0.64; p<0.001). In logistic regression model, FC remained independently associated with osteoporosis after controlling for confounders (age, menopause duration, reproductive period duration and body mass index) (OR=1.3; 95% CI 1.1-1.6).
Conclusion
Bone marrow adiposity is an independent predictor of low bone mass in postmenopausal women suggesting its role as a therapeutic target in postmenopausal osteoporosis management.

References

1.
Cuminetti V, Arranz L. Bone Marrow Adipocytes: The Enigmatic Components of the Hematopoietic Stem Cell Niche. J Clin Med. 2019;707.
2.
Mattiucci D, Maurizi G, Izzi V, Cenci L, Ciarlantini M, Mancini S, et al. Bone marrow adipocytes support hematopoietic stem cell survival. J Cell Physiol. 2018;1500–11.
3.
Singhal V, Tulsiani S, Campoverde K, Mitchell D, Slattery M, Schorr M, et al. Impaired bone strength estimates at the distal tibia and its determinants in adolescents with anorexia nervosa. Bone. 2018;61–8.
4.
Singhal V, Bredella M. Marrow adipose tissue imaging in humans. Bone. 2019;69–76.
5.
Shen W, Scherzer R, Gantz M, Chen J, Punyanitya M, Lewis C, et al. Relationship between MRI-measured bone marrow adipose tissue and hip and spine bone mineral density in African-American and Caucasian participants: the CARDIA study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;1337–46.
6.
Shen W, Chen J, Gantz M, Punyanitya M, Heymsfield S, Gallagher D, et al. MRI-measured pelvic bone marrow adipose tissue is inversely related to DXA-measured bone mineral in younger and older adults. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2012;983–8.
7.
Maciel J, De Araújo I, Carvalho A, Simão M, Bastos C, Troncon L, et al. Marrow fat quality differences by sex in healthy adults. J Clin Densitom. 2017;106–13.
8.
Griffith J, Yeung D, Antonio G, Lee F, Hong A, Wong S, et al. Vertebral bone mineral density, marrow perfusion, and fat content in healthy men and men with osteoporosis: dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and MR spectroscopy. Radiology. 2005;945–51.
9.
Li X, Kuo D, Schafer A, Porzig A, Link T, Black D, et al. Quantification of vertebral bone marrow fat content using 3 Tesla MR spectroscopy: reproducibility, vertebral variation, and applications in osteoporosis. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011;974–9.
10.
Tang G, Lv Z, Tang R, Liu Y, Peng Y, Li W, et al. Evaluation of MR spectroscopy and diffusion-weighted MRI in detecting bone marrow changes in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Clin Radiol. 2010;377–81.
11.
Dieckmeyer M, Ruschke S, Cordes C, Yap S, Kooijman H, Hauner H, et al. The need for T (2) correction on MRS-based vertebral bone marrow fat quantification: implications for bone marrow fat fraction age dependence. NMR Biomed. 2015;432–9.
12.
Karampinos D, Melkus G, Baum T, Bauer J, Rummeny E, Krug R. Bone marrow fat quantification in the presence of trabecular bone: initial comparison between water-fat imaging and single-voxel MRS. Magn Reson Med. 2014;1158–65.
13.
Limonard E, Veldhuis-Vlug A, Van Dussen L, Runge J, Tanck M, Endert E, et al. Shortterm effect of estrogen on human bone marrow fat. J Bone Miner Res. 2015;2058–66.
14.
Nouh M, Eid A. Magnetic resonance imaging of the spinal marrow: Basic understanding of the normal marrow pattern and its variant. World J Radiol. 2015;448–58.
15.
Pino A, Rodríguez J. Is fatty acid composition of human bone marrow significant to bone health. Bone. 2019;53–61.
16.
Wend K, Wend P, Drew B, Hevener A, Carboni M, Krum G, et al. ERα regulates lipid metabolism in bone through ATGL and perilipin. J Cell Biochem. 2013;1306–14.
17.
Fan Y, Hanai J, Le P, Bi R, Maridas D, Demambro V, et al. Parathyroid hormone directs bone marrow mesenchymal cell fate. Cell Metab. 2017;661–72.
18.
Liu P, Ji Y, Yuen T, Rendina-Ruedy E, Demambro V, Dhawan S, et al. Blocking FSH induces thermogenic adipose tissue and reduces body fat. Nature. 2017;107–12.
19.
Gasparrini M, Rivas D, Elbaz A, Duque G. Differential expression of cytokines in subcutaneous and marrow fat of aging C57BL/6J mice. Exp Gerontol. 2009;613–8.
20.
Paccou J, Penel G, Chauveau C, Cortet B, Hardouin P. Marrow adiposity and bone: Review of clinical implications. Bone. 2019;8–15.
21.
Veldhuis-Vlug A, Rosen C. Clinical implications of bone marrow adiposity. J Intern Med. 2018;121–39.

Citation

Authors retain copyright. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Creative Commons License

 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.