Aim Results of ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) as the compatibility of cytological findings with histopathological diagnoses (the "gold standard") in the diagnosis of nodular thyroid lesions are inconsistent. The aim of this prospective study was to determine the validity of FNAC, as well as the compatibility of findings with histopathological diagnoses. Methods The study included 92 patients who underwent FNAC and later surgery and histopathological assessment with a final diagnosis. Results FNAC showed 95% specificity, 78% sensitivity and 90% accuracy. The compatibility of the cytological and histopathological findings was good (Kappa coefficient of 0.756; 95% CI). The cytology results proved to be very good at predicting malignant histopathological findings, (OR=72.33; p˂0.001). Also, the result of ROC analysis (AUC=0.866) confirmed FNAC as a very good method of distinguishing benign and malignant thyroid nodules. Conclusion The results confirmed the correctness of the algorithm in which, following clinical or ultrasound confirmation of nodular thyroid lesions with suspicious changes, FNAC is indicated. The FNAC results should guide a clinician to further diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Certainly, in case of suspected follicular/ Hurthle cell lesions one should be vigilant and aware of the fact that in these cases malignancy is defined by the invasion of blood vessels and/or the capsule, which FNAC is unable to detect.
Clinicalpractice HI. Thethyroid nodule. Vol. 351, N Engl J Med. 2004. p. 1764–71.
2.
ZhuY SY, G X, Z F, W R. Causes of misdiagnosis by thyroid fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC): our experience and systematic review. Vol. 15, Diagn Pathol. 2020. p. 1–8.
3.
Bornelli L, SO F, R.L. Evaluation of a thyroid nodule. Vol. 43, Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2010. p. 229–38.
4.
Elsayed AA, Murdoch C. Murray S,Bashir K.Can thyroid surgery be decided based on ultrasonographic findings, irrespective of citopathological findings? Five-years retrospective study in a district general hospital. Vol. 72, Clin Radiol. 2017. p. 170–4.
5.
Guth S, Thenne U, Aberle J, Galach A, Bamherger CM. Very high prevalence of thyroid nodules detected by high frequency (13MHz) ultrasound examination. Vol. 39, Eur J Clin Invest. 2009. p. 699–706.
6.
Rossi ED, Vielh P. Thyroid and molecular testing. Advances in thyroid molecular cytopathology. Vol. 2, J Mol Pathol. 2021. p. 77–92.
7.
Elmaogullar S, Ozalkak S, Cetinkaya S, Karaman I, Uner C, Arda N, et al. Evaluation of Children and Adolescents with Thyroid Nodules: A Single Center Experience. Vol. 13, J Clin Pediatr Endocrinol. 2021. p. 276–84.
8.
Mazzaferi EL. Manegement of a solitary thyroid nodule. Vol. 328, N Engl J Med. 1993. p. 533–9.
9.
Mehanna HM, Jain A, Marlon RP, Watkinson J, Shaha A. Investigating thyroid nodule. Vol. 338, BMJ. 2009. p. 705–9.
10.
Brito JP, Morris JC, Montori VM. Thyroid cancer: zealous imaging has increased detection and treatment of low risk tumours. Vol. 347, BMJ. 2013.
11.
Bessey LJ, Lai NBK, Coorough NE, Chen H, Sippel RS. The incidence of thyroid cancer by needle aspiration varies by age and gender. Vol. 184, J Surg Res. 2013. p. 761–5.
12.
Davies L, Weleh HG. Increasing incidence of thyroid cancer in the United States, 1973-2002. Vol. 295, JAMA. 2006. p. 2164–7.
13.
Ahn HS, Kim HJ, Welch HG. Koreaʼs thyroid cancer ʺepidemicʺ-screening and overdiagnosis. Vol. 371, N Engl J Med. 2014. p. 1765–7.
14.
Brito JP, Gionfriddo MR, Nofal AA, Boehmer KR, Leppin AL, Reading C, et al. The accuracy of thyroid nodule ultrasound to predict thyroid cancer: systemic review and metaanalysis. Vol. 99, J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014. p. 1253–63.
15.
Rago T, Vitti P. Role of thyroid ultrasound in the diagnostic evaluation of thyroid nodules. Vol. 22, Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008. p. 913–28.
16.
Doubi A, Alrayes NS, Alqubaisi AK, Al-Dhahari SF. The value of repeating fine-needle aspiration for thyroid nodules. Vol. 41, Ann Saudi Med. 2021. p. 36–42.
17.
Daumerie C, Ayoubi S, Rahier J, Buysschsert M, Squifflet JP. Prevalence of thyroid cancer in hot nodules. Vol. 52, Ann Chir. 1998. p. 444–8.
18.
Pantanowitz L, Thompson LDR, Jing X, Rossi ED. Is thyroid core needle biopsy a valid compliment to fine-needle aspiration? Vol. 9, J Am Soc Cytopathol. 2020. p. 383–8.
19.
G SG, C Z, M B, G L. Fine needle aspiration cytology of the thyroid: a comparison of 5469 cytological and final histological diagnosis. Vol. 17, Cytopatology. 2006. p. 245–50.
20.
Kessler A, Gavriel H, Zahav S, Vaiman M, Shlamkovitch N, Segal S, et al. Accuracy and consistency of fine-needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis and management of solitary thyroid nodules. Vol. 7, Isr Med Assoc J. 2005. p. 371–3.
21.
Hauch A, Al-Qurayshi Z, Randolph G, Kandil E. Total thyroidectomy is associated with increased risk of complication for low- and high volume surgeons. Vol. 21, Ann Surg Oncol. 2014. p. 3843–52.
22.
Lubitz CC, Kong CY, McMahon PM, Daniels GH, Chen Y, Economopoulos KP, et al. Annual financial impact of well-differentiated thyroid cancer care in the United States. Vol. 120, Cancer. 2014. p. 1345–52.
23.
J FD, M L, TJ M, C S, M S. Fine needle aspiration in the investigation of thyroid nodules indications, procedures and interpretation. Vol. 113, Dtsch ArzteblInt. 2016. p. 353–9.
24.
Baloch ZW, LiVolsi VA, Asa SL, Rosai J, Merino MJ, Randolph G, et al. Diagnostic terminology and morphology criteria for cytologic diagnosis of thyroid lesions: a synopsis of the National Cancer Institute Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration State of the Science Conference. Vol. 366, Diagn Cytopathol. 2008. p. 425–37.
25.
Zhu Y, Song Y, Xu G, Fan Z, Ren W. Causes of misdiagnosis by thyroid fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC): our experience and systematic review. Vol. 15, DiagnPathol. 2020. p. 1–8.
26.
Albuja-Cruz MB, Goldfarb M, Gandek SS, Allan BJ, Lew JI. Reliability of fine-needle aspiration for thyroid nodules greater than or equal to 4cm. Vol. 18, J Surg Res. 2013. p. 6–10.
27.
Bajer ND, Hahn PF, Gervais DA, Samir A, Halpern EF, Mueller PR. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of thyroid nodules experience in a cohort of 944 patients. Vol. 193, AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009. p. 1175–9.
28.
De D, Dutta S, Tarafdar S, Kurr SS, Das U, Basu K, et al. Comparison between sonographic features and fine needle aspiration cytology with histopathology in the diagnosis of solitary thyroid nodule. Vol. 24, Indian J Endocr Metab. 2020. p. 349–54.
29.
Nandedkar SS, Dixit M, Malukarri K, Varma AV, Gombhir S. Evaluation of thyroid lesions by fineneedle aspiration cytology according to Bethesda system and its histopathological correlation. Vol. 8, Int J App Basic Med Res. 2018. p. 76–82.
30.
Poller DN, Schmitt F. Thyroid FNAC: Causes of false-positive results. Vol. 29, Cytopathology. 2018. p. 407–17.
31.
Ahn HS, Na DG, Baek JH, Sung JY, Kim JH. False negative rate of fine-needle aspiration in thyroid nodules: Impact of nodule size and ultrasound pattern. Vol. 41;967-973, Head and Neck. 2019.
32.
Graves TS, Olver M, Florentine BD, Raja AS, Cobb CJ, Tsao-wei DD. Follicular lesions of thyroid: A 5year fine-needle aspiration experience. Vol. 90, Cancer. 2000. p. 335–41.
33.
Slowinska-Klencka D, Wysocka-Konieczna K, Wozniak-Osela E, Sporny S, Popowicz B, Sopinski J, et al. Thyroid nodules with Hurthle cells: the malignancy risk in the relation to the FNA outcome category. Vol. 42, J Endocrinol Invest. 2019. p. 1319–27.
34.
Ren Y, Kyriazidis N, Faquin WC, Soylu S, Kamani D, Seade R, et al. Randolph GW.The presence of Hurthle cell does not increase the risk of malignancy in most bethesda categories in thyroid fine-needle aspirates. Thyroid. 2020. p. 30 425-431.
35.
Clark DP. Paquin WC. In: Thyroid cytopathology, Essentials in cytopathology. 2005. p. 1.
36.
Li L, Chen X, Li P, Liu Y, Ma X, Ye YQ. The value of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology combined with puncture feeling in the diagnosis of thyroid nodules. Vol. 65, Acta Cytologica. 2021. p. 368–76.
37.
Renshaw AA, Gould EW. Characteristic of false-negative thyroid fine-needle aspirates. Vol. 62, Acta Cytologica. 2018. p. 12–7.
38.
False negative cytology in large thyroid nodules. Vol. 22, Ann SurgOncol. 2015. p. 152–7.
39.
Yeh MW, Demircan O, Ituarte P, Clark OH. False negative fine-needle aspiration cytology results delay treatment and adversely affect outcome in patients with thyroid carcinoma. Vol. 14, Thyroid. 2004. p. 207–15.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
,
