Aim To investigate the efficacy and safety of the single-step surgery in elderly patients with obstructive colorectal cancer. Methods All patients who underwent single-step surgery and primary anastomosis for obstructive colorectal cancer in the period between January 2012 December 2017 were evaluated in this study. The patients were divided into two groups: younger than 65 (Group Young) and older than 65 (Group Old). Demographic data, American Society of Anesthesiologists scores (ASA) scores, comorbidities, preoperative albumin levels, type of surgery, postoperative morbidity and mortality, pathological stages, and overall survival rates were investigated. Results A total of 89 patients were included: 49 (54%) were older than 65 (Group Old). In Group Old, the mean age was 75 (65-97), of which 28 (58.3%) were males. There were 41 patients younger than 65 (Group Young) with the mean age of 52.6 (41-64 years of age), of which 21 (51.2%) were males. There was no difference between groups according to albumin level. There was no statistical difference between two groups according to tumour localization, pathological stage and type of surgery, as well as according to surgical complications. The median overall survival rate was 11 months in both groups (0-66) (p=0.320). Conclusion Meticulous preparation of older patients (correction of anaemia, electrolyte levels and pH) paves the road for successful surgeries, including single-step resection and primary anastomosis.
Yang Z, Wang L, Kang L, Xiang J, Peng J, Cui J, et al. Clinicopathologic characteristics and outcomes of patients with obstructive colorectal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011. p. 1213–22.
2.
Morton D, Fielding J. Surgery for colonic cancer. Martin Dunitz; 1998.
3.
Tekkis P, Kinsman R, Thompson M, Stamatakis J. The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland study of large bowel obstruction caused by colorectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2004. p. 76–81.
4.
Biondo S, Jurrieta E, Rague M, Ramos J, Deiros E, Moreno M, et al. Role of resection and primary anastomosis of the left colon in the presence of peritonitis. Br J Surg. 2000. p. 1580–4.
5.
Ansaloni L, Andersson R, Bazzoli F, Catena F, Cennamo V, Saverio D, et al. Guidelenines in the management of obstructing cancer of the left colon: consensus conference of the world society of emergency surgery (WSES) and peritoneum and surgery (PnS) society. World J Emerg Surg. 2010. p. 29.
6.
Terzi C, Sökmen S, Karademir S, Uçmak F, Karaege G, Füzün M. Kolorektal kanser cerrahisi yaşlı hastalarda güvenlidir. Geriartri. 2000. p. 51–5.
7.
New classification of physical status. Anesthesiology. American Society of Anesthesiologists; 1963. p. 111.
8.
Vivi A, Lopes A, Cavalcanti S, Rossi B, Marques L. Surgical treatment of colon and rectum adenocarcinoma in elderly patients. J Surg Oncol. 1992. p. 203–6.
9.
Grott M, Horisberger K, Weiß C, Kienle P, Hardt J. Resection enterostomy versus Hartmann’s procedure for emergency colonic resections. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017. p. 1171–7.
10.
Formisano V, Muria D, Connola A, Cione G, Falco G, L, et al. Our experience in the management of obstructing colorectal cancer. Ann Ital Chir. 2014. p. 563–8.
11.
Horesh N, Rudnicki Y, Dreznik Y, Zbar A, Gutman M, Zmora O, et al. Reversal of Hartmann’s procedure: still a complicated operation. Tech Coloproctol. 2018. p. 81–7.
12.
Formisano V, Muria D, Connola A, Cione G, Falco G, L, et al. Our experience in the management of obstructing colorectal cancer. Ann Ital Chir. 2014. p. 563–8.
13.
Kam M, Tang C, Chan E, Lim J, Eu K. Systematic review of intraoperative colonic irrigation vs. manual decompression in obstructed left-sided colorectal emergencies. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2009. p. 1031–7.
14.
Lim J, Tang C, Seow-Choen F, Heah S. Prospective, randomized trial comparing intraoperative colonic irrigation with manual decompression only for obstructed left-sided colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005. p. 205–9.
15.
Arenal J, Concejo B, Ortega M, E. Colorectal resection and primary anastomosis in patients aged 70 and older: prospective study. Eur J Surg. 1999. p. 593–7.
16.
Iversen L, Bülow S, Christensen I, Laurberg S, Harling H. Danish Colorectal Cancer Group. Postoperative medical complications are the main cause of early death after emergency surgery for colonic cancer. Br J Surg. 2008. p. 1012–9.
17.
Boyd J, Bradford B, Watne A. Operative risk factors of colon resection in the elderly. Ann Surg. 1980. p. 743–6.
18.
Fallahzadeh H, Evenrett T. Preexisting disease as a predictor of the outcome of colectomy. Am J Surg. 1994. p. 497–8.
19.
Hobler K. Colon surgery tor cancer in the very elderly. Cost and 3-year survival. Ann Surg. 1986. p. 129–31.
20.
Nwilloh J, Dardik 11, Dardik M, Aneke L, İbrahim L. Changing patterns in the morbidity and ınortality of colorectal surgery. Am J Surg. 1991. p. 83–4.
21.
Modini C, Romagnoli F, Milito D, Romeo R, Petroni V, R, et al. Octogenarians: an increasing challenge for acute care and colorectal surgeons. An outcomes analysis of emergency colorectal surgery in the elderly. Colorectal Dis. 2012. p. 312–8.
22.
Iversen L. Aspects of survival from colorec-tal cancer in Denmark. Dan Med J. 2012. p. 4428.
23.
Baccari P, Bisagni P, Crippa R, Sampietro R. Staudacher C. Operative and long-term results after onestage surgery for obstructing colonic cancer. Hepatogastroenterology. 2006. p. 698–701.
24.
Ohman U. Prognosis in patients with obstructing colorectal carcinoma. Am J Surg. 1982. p. 742–7.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
,
