Aim To assess whether the quality of diabetes care provided by a family medicine team changed over the course of four years and to identify potential gaps in our practice in order to improve it in the future. Methods An audit was carried out for randomly selected 120 medical records (MC) from the Diabetes Registry of patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus treated by one family medicine team for four consecutive years, from 2013 to 2016. We examined demographic data (gender, age, diabetes type, family history), annual examinations (glycated haemoglobin, blood glucose, lipid profile, neurological examination, urinalysis, foot care, ocular fundus and body mass index), prescribed insulin or other drugs and patients' education. Results Over the years females dominated with the maximum of 63% in 2013. In most years type 2 diabetes occurred in 93% of patients. The acceptable level of monitoring included examination of ocular fundus, lipid profile or total cholesterol, blood pressure, fasting and postprandial blood glucose with more than 80% annually. A low level of monitoring complications of diabetes was found on monofilament test, 26% in 2016, urinalysis, 20% in 2016 and examination of feet with the maximum of 46% in 2013. Outcome measurement showed satisfactory levels of glycated haemoglobin of 60% in 2014, blood pressure 76% in 2014, fast 56% and postprandial blood glucose of 73% in 2013. Conclusion We still need to find effective interventions that will lead to improvement of care for patients with diabetes in family medicine.
World Health Organization: Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Geneva, Department of noncommunicable disease surveillance. 1999.
2.
International Diabetes Federation. IDF diabetes atlas-7. 20AD.
3.
Zachariadou T, Makri L, Stoffers H, Philalithis A, Lionis C. The need for quality management in primary health care in Cyprus: results from a medical audit for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Qual Manag Health Care. 2006. p. 58–65.
4.
Georgiou A, Burns J, Mckenzie S, Penn D, Flack J, Harris M. Monitoring ghange in diabetes care using diabetes registes. Experience from division of general practice. Aust Fam Physician. 2006. p. 77–80.
5.
Renders C, Valk G, Griffin S, Wagner E, Van E, Assendelft J, et al. Interventions to improve the management of diabetes in primary care, outpatient and community settings: a systematic review. Diabetes Care. 2001. p. 1821–33.
6.
Novo A, Jokić I. Medical audit of diabetes mellitus in primary care setting in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Croat Med J. 2008. p. 757–62.
7.
Rutten G. Care of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in primary care. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2008. p. 2389–94.
8.
Shehab A, Elnour A, Abdulle A. A clinical audit on diabetes care in patients with type 2 diabetes in Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates. Open Cardiovasc Med J. 2012. p. 126–32.
9.
Lee T, Chan S, Chua W, Harbinder K, Khoo Y, Yeang O, et al. Audit of diabetes mellitus in general practice. Med J Malaysia. 2004. p. 317–22.
10.
Racic M, Kusmuk S, Mašić S, Ristić S, Ivković N, Djukanovic D, et al. Quality of diabetes care in family medicine practices in eastern Bosnia and Herzegovina. Prim Care Diabetes. 2015. p. 112–9.
11.
Agarwal G, Kaczorowski J, Hanna S. incentives for family medicine teams may contribute to improved services and better clinical outcomes. Canada. Int J Family Med. 2012. p. 16–9.
12.
Compared with other studies, these results highlight that we need better understanding of possible reasons of such fluctuations in diabetes care over the years, as well as the reasons for the lack of causal relationship between the process of diabetes care and outcome of the measures (20).
13.
Gavran L, Brkic S, Nuhbegovic S, Sivic S, Batic-Mujanovic O, Beganlic A. Improvement in monitoring of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) done by family medicine teams after implementation of DM flowcharts. Acta Inform Med. 2009. p. 15–9.
14.
Riđanović Z, Kerleta-Tuzović V, Mellitus N. Standardi za timove porodične/obiteljske medicine. Sarajevo: Agencija za kvalitet i akreditaciju u zdravstvu u Federaciji Bosne i Hercegovine. 2014. p. 57–61.
15.
Spann S, Nutting P, Galliher J, Peterson K, Pavlik V, Dickinson L, et al. Management of type 2 diabetes in the primary care setting: a practice-based research network study. Ann Fam Med. 2006. p. 23–31.
16.
Murphy M, Byrne M, Galvin R, Boland F, Fahey T, Smith S. Improving risk factor management for patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of healthcare interventions in primary care and community settings. BMJ Open. 2017.
17.
Harris B. Clinical inertia in patients with T2DM requiring insulin in family practice. Can Fam Physician. 2010. p. 418–24.
18.
Lang B, V, Marković B, Kranjčević B, K. Family Physician clinical inertia in glycemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes. Med Sci Monit. 2015. p. 403–11.
19.
Valk G, Renders C, Kriegsman D, Newton K, Twisk J, Eijk J, et al. Quality of care for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the Netherlands and the United States: a comparison of two quality improvement programs. Health Serv Res. 2004. p. 709–25.
20.
Gulliford M, Ashworth M, Robotham D, Mohiddin A. Achievement of metabolic targets for diabetes by English primary care practices under a new system of incentives. Diabet Med. 2007. p. 505–11.
21.
Ohman-Strickland P, Orzano A, Hudson V, Solberg I, Di CB, B, et al. Quality of diabetes care in family medicine practices: influence of nurse-practitioners and physician’s sssistants. Ann Fam Med. 2008. p. 14–22.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
,
