×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Review paper

Assessment of mothers’ satisfaction with health care during childbirth in a tertiary-level maternity ward

By
Adriana Haller ,
Adriana Haller

School of Medicine, University of Mostar , Mostar , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Albert Haller ,
Albert Haller

School of Medicine, University of Mostar , Mostar , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Dejan Tirić ,
Dejan Tirić

School of Medicine, University of Mostar , Mostar , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Clinical Hospital Mostar , Mostar , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Vajdana Tomić Orcid logo
Vajdana Tomić
Contact Vajdana Tomić

University Clinical Hospital Mostar , Mostar , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Clinical Hospital Mostar , Mostar , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Faculty of Health Studies, University of Mosta , Mostar , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Abstract

Aim
To evaluate satisfaction of mothers who gave birth at term with received hospital care and to find areas for improvement at a tertiary hospital.
Methods
A cross-sectional study at the Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology at the University Clinical Hospital Mostar was
conducted by an anonymous survey using a questionnaire designed exclusively for this study. A total of 100 mothers were included in the study.
Results
Satisfaction with midwives’ communication and their approach to the women during their stay in the delivery room
was rated significantly higher (4.7±0.6) when compared to obstetricians-gynaecologists (4.5±0.8) (p=0.02). Midwives were rated better in providing breastfeeding information (4.5±0.8) than for the speed of arrival after a call bell (average grade 4.2±1.0). Respondents were least satisfied with the hygiene (toilet, shower and rooms) and the quality of food (average grades 3.8±1.1 and 3.9±1.0, respectively). Mothers with previous experience in childbirth at the same hospital rated current stay with a similar level of satisfaction.
Conclusion
Good communication skills of medical and non-medical staff are a recommended step to maintain mothers′ childbirth
satisfaction, while improvement in quality of nutrition and hygiene should be mandatory.

References

1
Lazzerini M, Mariani I, Semenzato C, Valente E. Association between maternal satisfaction and other indicators of quality of care at childbirth: a cross-sectional study based on the WHO standards. BMJ Open 2020:37063.
2
Salin S, Kaunonen M, Aalto P. Explaining patient satisfaction without patient care using data-based nurse staffing indicators. J Nurs Adm 2012:592–7.
3
Blazquez A, R, Ferrandiz F, E, Caballero G, Corchon V, et al. Women’s satisfaction with maternity care during preterm birth. Birth 2019:670–7.
4
Tokunaga J, Imanaka Y. Influence of length of stay on patient satisfaction with hospital care in Japan. Int J Qual Health Care 2002:493–502.
5
Venn S, Fone D. Assessing the influence of sociodemographic factors and health status on expression of satisfaction with GP services. Clinical Governance: An International Journal 2005:118–25.
6
Nisa M, Sadaf R, Zahid M. Patient satisfaction survey in an obstetrics and gynaecology ward of a Tertiary care hospital. J Med Sci 2012:142–5.
7
Hussain S, Pervez K, Izzat F. To assess patient satisfaction in gynaecology and obstetrics in Tertiary care hospital and to highlight the areas of improvement. J Postgrad Med Inst 2015:93–6.
8
Xie A, Rock C, Hsu Y, Osei P, Andonian J, Scheeler V, et al. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Prevention Epicenter Program. Improving daily patient room cleaning: an observational study using a human factors and systems engineering approach. IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors 2018:178–91.
9
Burgener A. Enhancing communication to improve patient safety and to increase patient satisfaction. Health Care Manage (Frederick) 2017:238–43.
10
Sanchez-Piedra C, Prado-Galbarro F, Garcia-Perez S, Santamera A. Factors associated with patient satisfaction with primary care in Europe: results from the EU prime care project. Qual Prim Care 2014:147–55.
11
Xesfingi S, Vozikis A. Patient satisfaction with the healthcare system: assessing the impact of socio-economic and healthcare provision factors. BMC Health Serv Res 2016:94.
12
Batbaatar E, Dorjdagva J, Luvsannyam A, Amenta P. Conceptualisation of patient satisfaction: a systematic narrative literature review. Perspect Public Health 2015:243–50.
13
Okumu C, Oyugi B. Clients’ satisfaction with quality of childbirth services: A comparative study between public and private facilities in Limuru Sub-County. PLoS One n.d.:193593.
14
Intrapartum care for healthy women and babies 5AD.
15
Goldstein E, Farquhar M, Crofton C, Darby C. Garfinkel S. Measuring hospital care from the patients’ perspective: an over view of the CAHPS hospital survey development process. Health Serv Res 2005:1977–95.
16
Corscadden L, Callander E, Topp S, Watson D. Experiences of maternity care in New South Wales among women with mental health conditions. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2020:286.
17
Passarelli V, Lopes F, Merighe L, Araujo R. Nomura RMY. Satisfaction of adolescent mothers with childbirth care at a public maternity hospital. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2019:443–9.
18
Munavi-Babigumira S, Glenton C, Lewin S, Fretheim A, Nabudere H. Factors that influence the provision of intrapartum and postnatal care by skilled birth attendants in low-and middle-income countries: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017.
19
Handely S, Bell S, Nembhard I. A systematic review of surveys for measuring patients-centered care in the hospital setting. Med Care 2021:228–37.
20
Mutaganzwa C, Wibecan L, Hs, Nahimana E, Manzi A, Biziyaremye F, et al. Advancing the health of women and newborns: predictors of patient satisfaction among women attending antenatal and maternity care in rural Rwanda. Int J Qual Health Care 2018:793–801.

Citation

Authors retain copyright. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Creative Commons License

 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.