×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Review paper

Antimicrobial effectiveness of polyhexamethylene biguanide on Enterococcus faecalis, Staphylococcus epidermidis and Candida albicans

By
Ivana Medvedec Mikić Orcid logo ,
Ivana Medvedec Mikić
Contact Ivana Medvedec Mikić

Department of Endodontics and Restorative Dental Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Split, Split, Croatia

Livia Cigić ,
Livia Cigić

Department of Oral Medicine and Periodontology, Study Program of Dental Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Split, Split, Croatia

Darko Kero ,
Darko Kero

Study Programme of Dental Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Split, Split, Croatia

Danijela Kalibović Govorko ,
Danijela Kalibović Govorko

Study Programme of Dental Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Split, Split, Croatia

Goranka Prpić Mehičić ,
Goranka Prpić Mehičić

Department of Endodontics and Restorative Stomatology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia

Arjana Tambić Andrašević ,
Arjana Tambić Andrašević

Department of Clinical Microbiology, University Hospital for Infectious Diseases “Dr.Fran Mihaljevic”, Zagreb, Croatia

Paris Simeon
Paris Simeon

Department of Endodontics and Restorative Stomatology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia

Abstract

Aim
To evaluate the antimicrobial activity of 0.2% polyhexamethilene biguanide (PHMB) in root canal models infected with Enterococcus faecalis, Candida albicans and Staphylococcus epidermidis. PHMB was compared in these tests with 2.5% NaOCl and 0.2% CHX.
Methods
Prepared models of 50 human root canals (n=50) were immerged in mixed, four-weeks old culture that consisted of E .faecalis, S. epidermidis and C. albicans. Roots were randomly divided into three groups: one with 30 (n=30) and two with 10 (n=10) samples. Samples were treated with polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB) (0.2%), sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) (2.5%) and chlorhexidine (CHX) (0.2%), respectively. Root dentin was sampled before and after the tretment with these solutions. Colony-forming units (CFU) were counted to asses the antimicrobial effects of three solutions on viability of selected microrganisms in specimens before and after the treatment.T-test was used for comparison of results between specimens before and after the treatment, while Newman-Keuls test was used for pairwise comparison at p=0.05.
Results
The PHMB was significantly more efficient in reducing the number of all three tested microorganisms. NaOCl and CHX made only statistically significant (p<0.05) difference in case of E. faecalis and S. epidermidis. In the case of C. albicans, this difference was not statistically significant due to the small number of positive samples and high initial dispersion of results. Conclusion
Both solutions PHMB and NaOCl were successful in eliminating E. faecalis and S. epidermidis from the mature dentin biofilm, CHX was not successful enough.

References

1.
Ricucci D, Siqueira J. Biofilms and apical periodontitis: study of prevalence and association with clinical and histopathologic findings. J Endod. 2010. p. 1277–88.
2.
Rocas I, Siqueira J. Identification of bacteria enduring endodontic treatment procedures by a combined reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction and reverse-capture checkerboard approach. J Endod. 2010. p. 45–52.
3.
Burleson A, Nusstein J, Reader A, Beck M. The in vivo evaluation of hand/rotary/ultrasound instrumentation in necrotic, human mandibular molars. J Endod. 2007. p. 782–7.
4.
Jiang L, Hoogenkamp M, Van Der Sluis L, Wesselink P, Crielaard W, Deng D. Resazurin metabolism assay for root canal disinfectant evaluation on dual-species biofilms. J Endod. 2011. p. 31–5.
5.
Thurlow L, Hanke M, Fritz T, Aldrich A, Williams A, Engebretsen S, et al. Staphylococcus aureus biofilms prevent macrophage phagocytosis and attenuate inflammation in vivo. J Immunol. 2011. p. 6585–96.
6.
Molander A, Reit C, Dahlen G, Kvist T. Microbiological status of root-filled teeth with apical periodontitis. Int Endod J. 1998. p. 1–7.
7.
Stuart C, Schwartz S, Beeson T, Owatz C. Enterococcus faecalis: its role in root canal treatment failure and current concepts in retreatment. J Endod. 2006. p. 93–8.
8.
Haapasalo M, Orstavik D. In vitro infection and disinfection of dentinal tubules. J Dent Res. 1987. p. 1375–9.
9.
Jhamb S, Nikhil V, Singh V. An in vitro study of antibacterial effect of calcium hydroxide and chlorhexidine on Enterococcus faecalis. Indian J Dent Res. 2010. p. 512–4.
10.
Sen B, Safavi K, Spangberg L. Growth patterns of Candida albicans in relation to radicular dentin. 1997. p. 68–73.
11.
Siqueira J, Rocas I, Lopes H, Magalhaes F, De Uzeda M. Elimination of Candida albicans infection of the radicular dentin by intracanal medications. J Endod. 2003. p. 501–4.
12.
Rocas I, Hulsmann M, Siqueira J. Microorganisms in root canal-treated teeth from a German population. J Endod. 2008. p. 926–31.
13.
Nilsson M, Frykberg L, Flock J, Pei L, Lindberg M, Guss B. A fibrinogen-binding protein of Staphylococcus epidermidis. Infect Immun. 1998. p. 2666–73.
14.
Siqueira J, Lima K. Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus xylosus in a secondary root canal infection with persistent symptoms: a case report. Aust Endod J. 2002. p. 61–3.
15.
Niazi S, Clarke D, Do T, Gilbert S, Mannocci F, Beighton D. Propionibacterium acnes and Staphylococcus epidermidis isolated from refractory endodontic lesions are opportunistic pathogens. J Clin Microbiol. 2010. p. 3859–69.
16.
Rocas I, Siqueira J. In vivo antimicrobial effects of endodontic treatment procedures as assesed by molecular microbiological techniques. J Endod. 2011. p. 304–10.
17.
Guimarães N, Oh, Andrade L, Ferreira C, Rocha M, Gomes F. Microbiological evaluation of infected root canals and their correlation with pain. Sul-Brasileira de Odontologia. 2012. p. 31–7.
18.
Elzinga G, Van Doorn J, Wiersema A, Klicks R, Andriessen A, Alblas J, et al. Clinical evaluation of a PHMB-impregnated biocellulose dressing on paediatric lacerations. J Wound Care. 2011. p. 280–4.
19.
Sibbald R, Coutts P, Woo K. Reduction of bacterial burden and pain in chronic wounds using a new polyhexamethylene biguanide antimicrobial foam dressing-clinical trial results. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2011. p. 78–84.
20.
Rosin M, Welk A, Kocher T, Majic-Todt A, Kramer A, Pitten F. The effect of a polyhexamethylene biguanide mouthrinse compared to an essential oil rinse and a chlorhexidine rinse on bacterial counts and 4-day plaque regrowth. J Clin Periodontol. 2002. p. 392–9.
21.
Yanai R, Ueda K, Nishida T, Toyohara M, Mori O. Effects of ionic and surfactant agents on the antimicrobial activity of polyhexamethylene biguanide. Eye Contact Lens. 2011. p. 85–9.
22.
Lee Y, Han S, Hong S, Lee J, Ji H, Kum K. Antimicrobial efficacy of a polymeric chlorhexidine release device using in vitro model of Enterococcus faecalis dentinal tubule infection. J Endod. 2008. p. 855–8.
23.
Rocas I, Siqueira J. Comparison of the in vivo antimicrobial effectiveness of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine used as root canal irrigants: a molecular microbiology study. J Endod. 2011. p. 143–50.
24.
Gomes B, Vianna M, Sena N, Zaia A. In vitro evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of calcium hydroxide combined with chlorhexidine gel used as intracanal medicament. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006. p. 544–50.
25.
Mohammadi Z, Abbott P. Antimicrobial substantivity of root canal irrigants and medicaments: a review. Aust Endod J. 2009. p. 131–9.
26.
Haapasalo M, Shen Y, Qian W, Gao Y. Dent Clin North Am. 2010. p. 291–312.
27.
De Lucena J, Decker E, Walter C, Boeira L, Lost C, Weiger R. Antimicrobial effectiveness of intracanal medicaments on Enterococcus faecalis: chlorhexidine versus octenidine. Int Endod J. 2012. p. 53–61.
28.
Liu H, Wei X, Ling J, Wang W, Huang X. Biofilm formation capability of Enterococcus faecalis cells in starvation phase and its susceptibility to sodium hypochlorite. J Endod. 2010. p. 630–5.
29.
Alves F, Rocas I, Almeida B, Neves M, Zoffoli J, Siqueira J. Quantitative molecular and culture analyses of bacterial elimination in oval-shaped root canals by a single-file instrumentation technique. Int Endod J. 2012. p. 871–7.
30.
Zand V, Salem-Milani A, Shahi S, Akhi M. Vazifekhah S. Efficacy of different concentrations of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine in disinfection of contaminated Resilon cones. Med Oral PatolOral Cir Bucal. 2012. p. 352–5.
31.
Dumani A, Yoldas O, Isci A, Koksal F, Kayar B, Polat E. Disinfection of artificially contaminated Resilon cones with chlorhexidine and sodium hypochlorite at different time exposures. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007. p. 82–5.
32.
Juhn S, Jung M, Hoffman M, Drew B, Preciado D, Sausen N, et al. The role of inflammatory mediators in the pathogenesis of otitis media and sequelae. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2008. p. 117–38.
33.
Mcgill S, Gulabivala K, Mordan N, Ng Y. The efficacy of dynamic irrigation using a commercially available system (RinsEndo) determined by removal of a collagen “bio-molecular film” from an ex vivo model. Int Endod J. 2008. p. 602–8.
34.
Peters L, Wesselink P, Buijs J, Van Winkelhoff A. Viable bacteria in root dentinal tubules of teeth with apical periodontitis. J Endod. 2001. p. 76–81.
35.
Messick C, Pendland S, Moshirfar M, Fiscella R, Losnedahl K, Schriever C, et al. In-vitro activity of polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB) against fungal isolates associated with infective keratitis. J Aantimicrob Chemother. 1999. p. 297–8.
36.
Larkin D, Kilvington S, Dart J. Treatment of Acanthamoeba keratitis with polyhexamethylene biguanide. Ophthalmology. 1992. p. 185–91.
37.
Bystrom A, Claesson R, Sundqvist G. The antibacterial effect of camphorated paramonochlorophenol, camphorated phenol and calcium hydroxide in the treatment of infected root canals. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1985. p. 170–5.
38.
Murray B. Diversity among multidrug-resistant enterococci. Emerg Infect Dis. 1998. p. 37–47.
39.
Riboldi G, Frazzon J, Azevedo P, Frazzon A. Antimicrobial resistance profile of Enterococcus spp isolated from food in Southern Brazil. Braz J Microbiol. 2009. p. 125–8.
40.
Portenier I, Waltimo T, Haapasalo M. E.faecalisthe root canal survivor and “star” in post treatment disease. Endod Topics. 2003. p. 135–59.
41.
Kayaoglu G, Erten H, Orstavik D. Possible role of the adhesin ace and collagen adherence in conveying resistance to disinfectants on Enterococcus faecalis. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2008. p. 449–54.
42.
Chivatxaranukul P, Dashper S, Messer H. Dentinal tubule invasion and adherence by Enterococcus faecalis. Int Endod J. 2008. p. 873–82.
43.
Oncag O, Hosgor M, Hilmioglu S, Zekioglu O, Eronat C, Burhanoglu D. Comparison of antibacterial and toxic effects of various root canal irrigants. Int Endod J. 2003. p. 423–32.
44.
Vianna M, Horz H, Gomes B, Conrads G. In vivo evaluation of microbial reduction after chemo-mechanical preparation of human root canals containing necrotic pulp tissue. Int Endod J. 2006. p. 484–92.
45.
Pappen F, Qian W, Aleksejuniene J, Rde L, Leonardo T, Haapasalo M, et al. Inhibition of sodium hypochlorite antimicrobial activity in the presence of bovine serum albumin. J Endod. 2010. p. 268–71.
46.
Burgers R, Witecy C, Hahnel S, Gosau M. The effect of various topical peri-implantitis antiseptics on Staphylococcus epidermidis, Candida albicans, and Streptococcus sanguinis. Arch Oral Biol. 2012. p. 940–7.
47.
Henderson E, Schneider S, Petersen F, Haugen H, Wohlfahrt J, Ekstrand K, et al. Chemical debridement of contaminated titanium surfaces: an in vitro study. Acta Odontol Scand. 2012. p. 957–64.
48.
Brindle E, Miller D, Stewart P. Hydrodynamic deformation and removal of Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms treated with urea, chlorhexidine, iron chloride, or DispersinB. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2011. p. 2968–77.
49.
Ning Y, Hu X, Ling J, Du Y, Liu J, Liu H, et al. Candida albicans survival and biofilm formation under starvation conditions. Int Endod J. 2012. p. 62–70.
50.
Uppuluri P, Chaturvedi A, Srinivasan A, Banerjee M, Ramasubramaniam A, Kohler J, et al. Dispersion as an important step in the Candida albicans biofilm developmental cycle. PLoS Pathog. 2010. p. 1000828.

Citation

Authors retain copyright. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Creative Commons License

 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.