×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Review paper

Differences in newborn umbilical cord care

By
Sanja Kanisek ,
Sanja Kanisek
Contact Sanja Kanisek

Community-Health Nursing Services, Community Health Centre Osijek, Osijek, Croatia

Nada Prlić ,
Nada Prlić

University Study of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, J. J. Strossmayer University of Osijek, Osijek, Croatia

Ivana Barać ,
Ivana Barać

University Study of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, J. J. Strossmayer University of Osijek, Osijek, Croatia

Lorna Dubac Nemet
Lorna Dubac Nemet

University Study of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, J. J. Strossmayer University of Osijek, Osijek, Croatia

Abstract

Aim
To investigate the frequency of different cord care practices as well recommendations to parents on cord care, along with the need to identify as well as reach the consensus on best cord care practices and other procedures in newborn care among health workers.
Methods
The study was conducted among 110 health care workers at the nursery departments in two general hospitals, six community-health nursing services and 16 pediatric practices in Eastern Croatia. The questionnaire created for this research has evaluated different cord care practices and recommendations to parents, a need to identify, as well as reach the consensus on best practices in cord care and other procedures in newborn care.
Results
Statistically significant differences have been found among respondent groups in three “dry“ cord practices (p=0.000,
p=0.002, and p=0.004, respectively) and three “wet“ cord practices (p=0.000, p=0.001, and p=0.000, respectively). Significant differences were determined in three types of recommendations to parents about the care of ”dry” cord (p=0.000, p=0.000, and p=0.002, respectively) and two recommendations for ”wet” cord (p =0.000, p=0.000, respectively). The majority of respondents stressed the need for publishing guidelines on cord care, 104 (94.5%), and for other procedures in newborn care, 108 (98.2%). More than a half of respondents, 63 (57.3%), declared the need to
reach a national agreement on guidelines for umbilical cord care.
Conclusion
Healthcare workers employ, as well as recommend, different umbilical cord care practices. It is necessary to prepare
and reach a national agreement on written guidelines for umbilical cord care as well as for other procedures in newborn care.

References

1.
Mardešić D, Pedijatrija, Zagreb. Školskaknjiga; 2000.
2.
Mcconell T, Lee C, Couillard M, Sherrill W. Trends in umbilical cord care: scientific evidence for practice. Newborn Infant Nurs Rev. 2004. p. 211–22.
3.
Block S. Stumped" by the newborn umbilical cord. Pediatr Ann. 2012. p. 400–3.
4.
World Health Organization Pregnancy, childbirth, postpartum and newborn care: a guide for essential practice. 7AD.
5.
Zupan J, Garner P, Omari A. Topical umbilical cord care at birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004.
6.
Malčić I, Ilić R. Pedijatrija sa zdravstvenom njegom. Zagreb: Školska knjiga. 2008.
7.
Guala A, Guarino R, Zaffaroni M, Martano C, Fabris C, Pastore G, et al. The impact of national and international guidelines on newborn care in the nurseries of Piedmont. BMC Pediatr. 2005. p. 45.
8.
Ireland J, Rennie A, Hundley V, Fitzmaurice A, Graham W. Cord-care practice in Scotland. Midwifery. 2000. p. 237–45.
9.
Ford L, Ritchie J. Maternal perceptions of newborn umbilical cord treatmens and healing. JO-GNN. 1999. p. 501–6.
10.
Mugford M, Somchiwong M, Waterhouse I. Treatment of umbilical cords: a randomised trial to assess the effect of treatment methods on the work of midwives. Midwifery. 1986. p. 177–86.
11.
Mahrous E, Darwish M, Dabash S, Marie I, Abdelwahab S. Topical application of human milk reduces umbilical cord separation time and bacterial colonization compared to ethanol in newborns. Transl Biomed. 2012. p. 1.
12.
Blume-Peytavi U, Hauser M, Stamatas G, Pathirana D, Bartels N. Skin care practices for newborns and infants: review of the clinical evidence for best practice. Pediatr Dermatol. 2012. p. 1–14.
13.
Bryanton J, Walsh D, Barrett M, Gaudet D. Tub bathing versus traditional sponge bathing for the newborn. JOGNN. 2004. p. 704–12.
14.
Henningsson A, Nystrom B, Tunell R. Bathing or washing after birth. Lancet. 1981. p. 1401–3.
15.
Hylen A, Karlsson E, Svanberg L, Walder M. Hygiene for the newborn: To bath or to wash? J Hyg. 1983. p. 529–34.

Citation

Authors retain copyright. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Creative Commons License

 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.