Home Current Archive Editorial Team
About us
Aims and scope About Author Guidelines
News Contact
×
Home Current Archive Editorial board

Aims and scope About Author Guidelines
News Contact
Review paper
Received: 11.09.2023. >> Accepted: 22.11.2023. >> Published: 01.12.2023. Biochemistry
<< Prev | Next >>
PDF
https://doi.org/10.17392/1670-23

Comparison between conventional open-heart valve surgery and minimally invasive valve replacement surgery regarding the length of hospital stay and usage of blood derivates: insights from a single-centre, single-surgeon study conducted in Bosnia and Herzegovina

By
Nermir Granov Orcid logo ,
Nermir Granov
Contact Nermir Granov

Clinical Centre University of Sarajevo , Sarajevo , Bosnia and Herzegovina

View authors publications

Search this author on:

PubMed | Google Scholar
Amel Hadžimehmedagić ,
Amel Hadžimehmedagić

Clinical Centre University of Sarajevo , Sarajevo , Bosnia and Herzegovina

View authors publications

Search this author on:

PubMed | Google Scholar
Armin Šljivo ,
Armin Šljivo
Contact Armin Šljivo

Clinical Centre University of Sarajevo , Sarajevo , Bosnia and Herzegovina

View authors publications

Search this author on:

PubMed | Google Scholar
Tarik Selimović ,
Tarik Selimović

Clinical Centre University of Sarajevo , Sarajevo , Bosnia and Herzegovina

View authors publications

Search this author on:

PubMed | Google Scholar
Damir Kurtagić ,
Damir Kurtagić

Clinical Centre University of Sarajevo , Sarajevo , Bosnia and Herzegovina

View authors publications

Search this author on:

PubMed | Google Scholar
Edin Kabil ,
Edin Kabil

Clinical Centre University of Sarajevo , Sarajevo , Bosnia and Herzegovina

View authors publications

Search this author on:

PubMed | Google Scholar
Muhamed Djedović ,
Muhamed Djedović

Clinical Centre University of Sarajevo , Sarajevo , Bosnia and Herzegovina

View authors publications

Search this author on:

PubMed | Google Scholar
Arian Abdulkhaliq
Arian Abdulkhaliq

Faculty of Medicine of Iuliu Haţieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy Cluj-Napoca , Cluj-Napoca , Romania

View authors publications

Search this author on:

PubMed | Google Scholar

Abstract

Aim
 To analyse the correlation between different surgical methodologies employed in valve diseases treatment and their subsequent impact on the duration of hospitalization.
Methods
 This retrospective study conducted at the Clinical Centre of the University of Sarajevo analysed medical records of 163 valve disease patients treated between January 2019 and November 2022. The patients were divided into two groups: 77 had openheart valve surgery and 86 underwent minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS).
Results
 The mean duration of the surgical procedures was 3.9±1.3 hours, with conventional open-heart surgery requiring an average of 3.6±1.1 hours and minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) procedure 4.2±1.5 hours. No substantial disparities were found in the total length of hospitalization between the two groups, as both conventional (8.2±4.5 days) and MICS (8.7±7.0 days) demonstrated similar duration. Similarly, the total duration of intensive care unit (ICU) stay displayed similarity, with conventional surgery patients staying an average of 3.9±2.8 days and MICS patients of 4.2±4.1 days. The pattern of blood transfusion and fresh-frozen plasma usage revealed higher rates in the conventional valve surgery group comparing to the MICS group.
Conclusion
 Minimally invasive valve surgery, despite slightly longer operative times, resulted in lower blood transfusion requirements and comparable hospitalization and ICU stay.

Keywords:

blood,
Bosnia and Herzegovina,
cardiovascular surgical procedures,
heart valves,
minimally invasive surgical procedures

References

1.
Cohn L. Minimally invasive valve surgery. J Card Surg. 2001;260–5.
2.
Glauber M, Karimov J, Farneti P, Cerillo A, Santarelli F, Ferrarini M, et al. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery via right minithoracotomy. Multimed Man Cardiothorac Surg. 2009;(122).
3.
Tommaso D, Bruno E, V. Commentary: The rise of minimalism in cardiac surgery. JTCVS Tech. 2021;67–8.
4.
Gulbins H, Pritisanac A, Hannekum A. Minimally invasive heart valve surgery: already established in clinical routine? Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2004;837–43.
5.
Filip G, Bryndza M, Konstanty-Kalandyk J, Piatek J, Wegrzyn P, Ceranowicz P, et al. Ministernotomy or sternotomy in isolated aortic valve replacement? Early results. Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol. 2018;213–8.
6.
Bonacchi M, Prifti R, Giunti G, Frati G, Sani G. Does ministernotomy improve postoperative outcome in aortic valve operation? A prospective randomized study. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;460–5.
7.
Kohorst K, Pretorius M. Future Technology Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2019;123–33.
8.
Harky A, Botezatu B, Kakar S, Ren M, Shirke M, Pullan M. Mitral valve diseases: Pathophysiology and interventions. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2021;98–104.
9.
Wolfe J, Malaisrie S, Farivar R, Khan J, Hargrove W, Moront M, et al. Innovations (Phila). 2016;251–9.
10.
Singh K, Anderson E, Harper J. Overview and management of sternal wound infection. Semin Plast Surg. 2011;25–33.
11.
Abu-Omar Y, Fazmin I, Ali J, Pelletier M. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery. J Thorac Dis. 2021;1960–70.
12.
Kirmani B, Mazhar K, Fabri B, Pullan D. Comparison of the EuroSCORE II and Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 risk tools. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;999–1005.
13.
Shahian D, Jacobs J, Badhwar V, Kurlansky P, Furnary A, Cleveland J, et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2018 adult cardiac surgery risk models: Part 1-background, design considerations, and Model Development. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018;1411–8.
14.
Glauber M, Ferrarini M, Miceli A. Minimally invasive aortic valve surgery: state of the art and future directions. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2015;26–32.
15.
Movahed M, Etemad S, Hashemzadeh M. Hashemzadeh M. Persistent reduction in the age adjusted mortality rate from aortivc valve surgery in the United States with elimination of gender gap in recent years. Am J Cardiovasc Dis. 2020;522–7.
16.
Schlösser F, Vaartjes I, Van Der Heijden G, Moll F, Verhagen H, Muhs B, et al. Mortality after elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Ann Surg. 2010;158–64.
17.
Berger J, Holubkov R, Reeder R, Wessel D, Meert K, Berg R, et al. Morbidity and mortality prediction in pediatric heart surgery: physiological profiles and surgical complexity. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;620–8.
18.
Pope N, Ailawadi G. Minimally Invasive Valve Surgery. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2014;387–94.
19.
Ko K, De Kroon T, Post M, Kelder J, Schut K, Saouti N, et al. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a systematic safety analysis. Open Heart. 2020;1393.
20.
Ullah W, Sattar Y, Mukhtar M, Abdullah H, Figueredo V, Haas D, et al. Outcomes of open mitral valve replacement versus transcatheter mitral valve repair; insight from the National Inpatient Sample Database. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2020;100540.
21.
Iba Y, Yamada A, Kurimoto Y, Hatta E, Maruyama R, Miura S. Perioperative outcomes of minimally invasive aortic arch reconstruction with branched grafts through a partial upper sternotomy. Ann Vasc Surg. 2020;217–23.
22.
Fishbein G, Fishbein M. Mitral Valve Pathology. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2019;61.
23.
Grant S, Hickey G, Modi P, Hunter S, Akowuah E, Zacharias J. Propensity-matched analysis of minimally invasive approach versus sternotomy for mitral valve surgery. Heart. 2019;783–9.
24.
Bergsland J, Mujanovic E, Elle O, Mirtaheri P. Fosse E. Minimally invasive repair of the mitral valve: technological and clinical developments. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2011;72–7.
25.
Sorajja P, Ukaigwe A. Edge-to-edge repair: past challenge, current case selection and future advances. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2021;43–9.
26.
Shechter A, Lee M, Kaewkes D, Koren O, Skaf S, Chakravarty T, et al. Siegel RJ. Repeat mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair for recurrent significant mitral regurgitation. J Am Heart Assoc. 2023;28654.
27.
Botta L, Cannata A, Bruschi G, Fratto P, Taglieri C, Russo C, et al. Minimally invasive approach for redo mitral valve surgery. J Thorac Dis. 2013;686–93.
28.
Sündermann S, Czerny M, Falk V. Open vs. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: surgical technique, indications and results. Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 2015;160–6.

Citation

Copyright

Authors retain copyright. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Creative Commons License

 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

{{ submission.title }}
Issue image
Vol 21, Issue 1, 2024
Hypoxic mesenchymal stem cells (MSCS)-induced interleukin (IL)-10 alleviate systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) infl ammation through inhibiting interferon (IFN)-gamma production Prevalence of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations and correlation with histological patterns in lung adenocarcinoma in patients from Bosnia and Herzegovina Effect of plateletpheresis on haematological values in voluntary donors: a retrospective data analysis over an eight-month period Breaking habits: safety and efficacy of elective electrocardioversion of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter in the setting of day hospital Prevalence of familial hypercholesterolemia in patients with acute coronary syndrome See full issue

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.