Aim To explore the experiences of anaesthesia nurses in assessing postoperative pain in patients undergoing total hip and/or knee arthroplasty. Methods Data were collected through four focus group interviews (FGI) using the critical incident technique (CIT). The participants were six men and 12 women, all registered nurses with further education in anaesthesia with at least five-year experience of caring for patients on a postoperative ward. Results Maintaining communication with orthopaedic patients, different ways to assess pain, the assessment of unresponsive patients, using pain assessment scales and different work circumstances influencing their use, were stated as the main problems the nurses emphasize while assessing the pain of patients. Conclusion Skills related to observing the behaviour and experience of pain in different individuals are needed to ensure an understanding of patients' pain, as well as the patients' ability to estimate their pain, where the intensity of the pain varies in different patients. Further studies are needed to examine the way health professionals assess pain, depending on the patients' ability to transform their pain from a subjective feeling into an objective numeric grade. The way individuals assess their pain differently and the way the resulting knowledge and experience of postoperative care may help nurses and other health-care professionals.
The World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Code of Ethics 1964 (revised) 2005.
2
Crossing the Quality Chasm: A new Health System for the 21st Century 2001.
3
Watson J. The philosophy and science of caring 2008.
4
Watson J. Applying the art and science of human caring 1994.
5
Watson J. Postmodern Nursing and Beyond 1999.
6
Watson J, Foster R. The attending nurse caring model: Integrating theory, evidence and advanced caring-healing therapeutics for transforming professional practice. J Clin Nurs 2003:360–5.
7
Flanagan J. The critical incident technique. Psychol Bull 1954:327–58.
8
Lafferty M, I. Focus group interviews as a data collecting strategy. J Adv Nurs 2004:187–94.
9
Bradbury-Jones C, Tranter S. Inconsistent use of the critical incident technique in nursing research. J Adv Nurs 2008:399–407.
10
Kvale S. Den kvalitativa forskningsintervjun (The qualitative research interview) 1997.
11
Rudolfsson G, Hallberg L, Ringsberg K. The nurse has time for me: the perioperative dialogue: from the perspective of patients. J Adv Perioperat Care 2003:77–84.
12
Alharbi T, Carlström E, Ekman I, Jarneborn A. Olsson LE. Experiences of person-centered care -patients’ perceptions: qualitative study. BMC Nurs 2014:28.
13
Jacobsen R, Mölrup C, Christrup L, Sjögren P. Patient-related barriers to cancer pain management: a systematic exploratory review. Scand J Caring Sci 2009:190–208.
14
Agledahl K, Gulbrandsen P, Förde F, Wifstad A. Courteous but not curious: how doctors’ politeness masks their existential neglect. A qualitative study of video-recorded patient consultations. J Med Ethics 2011:650–4.
15
Young J, Horton M, Davidhizar R. Nursing attitudes and beliefs in pain assessment and management. J Adv Nurs 2006:412–21.
16
Van Dijk J, Kappen T, Schuurmans M, Van Wijck A. The relation between patients’ NRS pain scores and their desire for additional opioids after surgery. Pain Pract 2014:604–9.
17
Van Dijk J, Van Wijck A, Kappen T, Peelen L, Kalkman C, Schuurmans M. Postoperative pain assessment based on numeric ratings is not the same for patients and professionals: A cross sectional study. Int J Nurs Stud 2012:65–71.
18
Bergh I, Jakobsson E, Sjöström B. Worst experiences of pain and conceptions of worst pain imaginable among nursing students. J Adv Nurs 2008:484–91.
19
Stomberg M, Wickström K, Joelsson H, Sjöström B, Haljamäe H. Postoperative pain management on surgical wards-do quality assurance strategies result in long-term effects on staff member attitudes and clinical outcomes? Pain Manag Nurs 2003:11–22.
20
Ericson-Lidman E, Norberg A, Persson B, Strandberg G. Healthcare personnel’s experiences of situations in municipal elderly care that generate troubled conscience. Scand J Caring Sci 2013:215–23.
21
Krupic F, Määttä S, Garellick G, Lyckhage E, Kärrholm J. Preoperative information provided to Swedish and immigrant patients before total hip replacement. Med Arch 2012:399–404.
22
Sundberg M, Lidgren L, Dahl-W A, Robertsson O, Skar. Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register Annual Report 2014.
23
Kehlet H, Wilmore D. Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery. Ann Surg 2008:189–98.
24
Allvin R, Smith E, Rawal N, Ehnfors M, Kling A, Idvall E. The Postoperative recovery profile (PRP)a multi-dimensional questionnaire for evaluation of recovery profiles. J Eval Clin Pract 2011:236–43.
25
Fletcher D, Fermanian C, Mardaye A, Aegerter P. Pain and Regional Anaesthesia Committee of the French Anesthesia and Intensive Care Society (SFAR): a patient-based national survey on postoperative pain management in France reveals significant achievement and persistent challenges. Pain 2008:441–51.
26
Foss M. Enhanced recovery after surgery and implications for nurse education. Nurs Stand 2011:35–9.
27
Dihle A, Helseth S, Kongsgaard U, Paul S, Miaskowski C. Using the American Pain Society’s outcome questionnaire to evaluate the quality of postoperative pain management in a sample of Norwegian patients. J Pain 2006:272–80.
28
Hartog C, Rothaug J, Goettermann A, Zimmer A, Meissner W. Room for improvement: nurses’ and physicians’ views of a post-operative pain management program. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2010:277–83.
29
Manias E, Bucknall T, Botti M. Nurses’ strategies for managing pain in the postoperative setting. Pain Manag Nurs 2005:18–29.
30
Stiggelbout A, Van Der Weijden T, Wit D, Frosch M, Légaré D, Montori F, et al. Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of health care. BMJ 2012:256.
Krupic F, Eisler T, Garellick G, Kärrholm J. Influence of ethnicity and socioeconomic factors on outcome after total hip replacement. Scand J Caring Sci 2013:139–46.
33
Gordon D, Dahl J, Miaskowski C, Mccarberg B, Todd K, Paice J, et al. American pain society recommendations for improving the quality of acute and cancer pain management: American Pain Society Quality of Care Task Force. Arch Intern Med 2005:1574–80.
34
Hjermstad M, Fayers P, Haugen D, Caraceni A, Hanks G, Loge J, et al. Studies comparing Numerical Rating Scales, Verbal Rating Scales, and Visual Analogue Scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: a systematic literature review. J Pain Symptom Manage 2011:1073–93.
35
Wikstrom L, Eriksson E, Fridlund B, Arestedt K, Broström A. Healthcare professionals’ perceptions of the use of pain scales in postoperative pain assessments. Appl Nurs Res 2013:53–8.
36
Harper P, Ersser S, Gobbi M. How military nurses rationalize their postoperative pain assessment decisions. J Adv Nurs 2007:602–11.
37
Wikström L, Eriksson K, Fridlund B, Årestedt K, Broström A. Healthcare professionals’ descriptions of care experiences and actions when assessing postoperative pain -a critical incident technique analysis. Scand J Caring Sci 2016:802–12.
38
Wang H, Tsai Y. Nurses’ knowledge and barriers regarding pain management in intensive care units. J Clin Nurs 2010:3188–96.
39
Krupic F, Eisler T, Sköldenberg O, Fatahi N. Experience of anaesthesia nurses of perioperative communication in hip fracture patients with dementia. Scand J Caring Sci 2015:99–107.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
,
