×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Review paper

The relationship between protective factors and a measure of psychological resistance in women diagnosed with breast cancer

By
Delila Lisica Orcid logo ,
Delila Lisica
Contact Delila Lisica

Department of Public Health, Medical Faculty, University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Jadranka Kolenović-Ðapo ,
Jadranka Kolenović-Ðapo

Department of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Amela Džubur ,
Amela Džubur

Department of Public Health, Medical Faculty, University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Damir Abdulahović ,
Damir Abdulahović

Institute for Public Health of Canton Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Malik Ejubović
Malik Ejubović

Department of Internal Diseases, Cantonal Hospital Zenica, Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Abstract

Aim
To examine the relationship of protective factors (self-esteem, optimism, proactive coping), and a measure of psychological resistance in women diagnosed with breast cancer, and the contribution of protective factors in explaining the criterion of posttraumatic growth.
Methods
The study included 100 women diagnosed with breast cancer. To examine optimism the Scale of Dispositional Optimism and Pessimism, the Scale of Self-esteem for self-esteem and the Scale of Proactive Coping for proactive coping were used. The posttraumatic growth measured five factors: relating to others, new possibilities, personal strength, spiritual changes, appreciation of life.
Results
Self-esteem, optimism and proactive coping were associated with posttraumatic growth and its factors: new possibilities, personal strength, appreciation of life. Optimism and proactive coping positively corelated also with relating to others. Final model of posttraumatic growth in all three steps (self-esteem, optimism, proactive coping) explained 20.4% variability of the posttraumatic growth total score.
Conclusion
Posttraumatic growth does not mean a decrease in trauma, but leads to a change in the perception and view of life. It refers to more favourable management and use of its own resources, relying on its own strengths and capabilities, identifying new opportunities and connecting with others.

References

1.
Gallagher J, Parle M, Cairns D. Appraisal and psychological distress six months after diagnosis of breast cancer. Br J Health Psychol. 2002. p. 365–76.
2.
Dahl F, Reinertsen C, Nesvold K, Fosså I, Dahl S, A. A study of body image in long term breast cancer survivors. Cancer. 2010. p. 3549–57.
3.
Freedman T. Social and cultural dimensions of hair loss in women treated for breast cancer. Cancer Nurs. 1994. p. 334–41.
4.
Lelorain S, Tessier P, Florin A, Bonnaud-Antignac A. Posttraumatic growth in long term breast cancer survivors: relation to coping, social support and cognitive processing. J Health Psychol. 2012. p. 627–39.
5.
Tedeschi R, Calhoun L. Trauma and transformation: growing in the aftermath of suffering. Sage; 1995.
6.
Tedeschi R, Calhoun L. Posttraumatic growth: conceptual foundations and empirical evidence. Psychol Inq. 2004. p. 93–102.
7.
Tedeschi R, Calhoun L. The Posttraumatic Growth Inventory: measuring the positive legacy of trauma. J Trauma Stress. 1996. p. 455–71.
8.
Carver C, Pozo C, Harris S, Noriega V, Scheier M, Robinson D, et al. How coping mediates the effect of optimism on distress: A study of women with early stage breast cancer. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1993. p. 375–90.
9.
Schwarzer R, Taubert S. Beyond Coping: Meeting Goals, Visions and Challenges. Oxford University Press; 2002. p. 19–35.
10.
Chang A, Mackenzie A. State self-esteem following stroke. Stroke. 1998. p. 2325–8.
11.
Greenberg J, Solomon S, Pyszczynski T, Rosenblatt A, Burling J, Lyon D, et al. Why do people need self-esteem? Converging evidence that self-esteem serves an anxiety-buffering function. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1992. p. 913–22.
12.
Mann M, Hosman C, Schaalma H, De Vries N. Selfesteem in a broad-spectrum approach for mental health promotion. Health Educ Res. 2004. p. 357–72.
13.
Scheier M, Carver C. Optimism, coping, and health: assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies. Health Psychol. 1985. p. 219–47.
14.
Schmidt S, Blank T, Bellizzi K, Park C. The relationship of coping strategies, social support, and attachment style with posttraumatic growth in cancer survivors. J Health Psychol. 2011. p. 1033–40.
15.
Milam J. Posttraumatic growth among HIV/AIDS patients. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2004. p. 2353–76.
16.
Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Am Psychol. 2002. p. 493.
17.
Rosenberg M. Ethnic identity in adolescents and adults: review of research. Psychol Bull. 1965. p. 499–514.
18.
Penezić Z, Lacković-Grgin K, Proroković A, Ćubela V, Penezić Z. Skala optimizma i pesimizma (O-P skala). Zbirka psihologijskih skala i upitnika. Zadar: Filozofski fakultet. 2002. p. 15–7.
19.
Greenglass E, Schwarzer R, Taubert S. The Proactive Coping Inventory (PCI): A multidimensional research instrument. 1999.
20.
Hauser S. Understanding resilient outcomes: Adolescent lives across time and generations. J Res Adolesc. 1999. p. 1–24.
21.
Engelkemeyer S, Marwit S. Posttraumatic growth in bereaved parents. J Trauma Stress. 2008. p. 344–6.
22.
Bhushan B, Kumar J. A study of posttraumatic stress and growth in Tsunami relief volunteers. J Loss Trauma. 2012. p. 113–24.
23.
Taylor S, Kemeny M, Bower J, Gruenewald T, Reed G. Psychological resources, positive illusions, and health. Am Psychol. 2000. p. 99–109.

Citation

Authors retain copyright. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Creative Commons License

 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.