Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Golestan University of Medical Sciences , Gorgan , Iran
,
Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Golestan University of Medical Sciences , Gorgan , Iran
Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Golestan University of Medical Sciences , Gorgan , Iran
Aim
To determine obstacles in maintaining professional integrity of nurses and their strategy to overcome them.
Methods
A conventional content analysis was conducted by 16 interviews. The data collection instruments were semi-structured interviews, observation and field notes. The interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim, then analysed by Grandhime and Landman approach. For the validity and reliability of the study Guba and Lincoln criteria were used.
Results
Latent meanings were formulated into "passive management", "inefficient organization", and "solid spirituality" themes. Passive management consisted of "lack of support from managers", "not understanding the nurses" and "improper supervision system". Inefficient organization was composed of "nursing staff shortages", "underestimation of nurses' roles" and "high workload". "Religious beliefs" and "personal beliefs" constituted the "solid spirituality" theme.
Conclusion
There are factors that decline motivations in Iranian nurses; nevertheless, it is still possible to be a professionally integrated nurse. Among many factors contributing to internalization of professional integrity of nurses, spirituality is one of the most prominent factors.
This work is licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International ![]()
1
Mahsa Jafari, Behrouz Dadkhah, Mohammad-Ali Mohammadi, Abdulqadir J. Nashwan
(2025)
Investigating the Relationship Between Nursing Managers’ Ethical Decision‐Making Confidence and the Ethical Behavior of Nurses in Hospitals in Northwestern Iran
Journal of Nursing Management, 2025(1)
10.1155/jonm/3448243The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.