Home Current Archive Editorial Team
About us
Aims and scope About Author Guidelines
News Contact
×
Home Current Archive Editorial board

Aims and scope About Author Guidelines
News Contact
Review paper
Received: 08.01.2019. >> Accepted: 16.03.2020. >> Published: 12.07.2020. Biochemistry
<< Prev | Next >>
PDF
https://doi.org/10.17392/1131-20

Securing the base of the appendix during laparoscopic appendectomy

By
Samir Delibegović Orcid logo ,
Samir Delibegović
Contact Samir Delibegović

Clinic for Surgery, University Clinical Center Tuzla, Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Faculty of Medicine, University of Tuzla, Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina

View authors publications

Search this author on:

PubMed | Google Scholar
Reuf Karabeg ,
Reuf Karabeg

Surgical polyclinic ,,Karabeg'' Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina

View authors publications

Search this author on:

PubMed | Google Scholar
Milan Simatović
Milan Simatović

Clinic for Surgery, Clinical Center of Republika Srpska, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina

View authors publications

Search this author on:

PubMed | Google Scholar

Abstract

In contrast to classical appendectomy where the appendiceal stump is secured by a single or double ligature, in laparoscopic appendectomy various ways of securing the stump are mentioned. Each of these methods has advantages and disadvantages. Since different possibilities exist for closing the stump, it is very important to find the optimum method for closure of the appendiceal stump, bearing in mind their simplicity, biocompatibility and price. The aim of this review article has been to present the problem of securing the base of the appendix during laparoscopic appendectomy.

Keywords:

appendix,
laparoscopic appendectomy,
linear stapler,
titanium

References

1.
Brunicardi C, Andersen D, Billiar T, Dunn D, Kao, Hunter J, et al. Schwartz’s Principles of Surgery. McGraw-Hill Education; 2019.
2.
Neugebauer E, Troidl H, Kum C, Eypasch E, Miserez M, Paul A. EAES Guidelines for Endoscopic Surgery. Springer; 2006. p. 265–89.
3.
Wagner M, Aronsky D, Tschudi J, Metzger A, Klaiber C. Laparoscopic stapler appendectomy. A prospective study of 267 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc. 1996. p. 895–9.
4.
Delibegovic S, Matovic E. Hem-o-lok plastic clips in securing of the base of the appendix during laparoscopic appendectomy. Surg Endosc. 2009. p. 2851–4.
5.
Rickert A, Krüger C, Runkel N, Kuthe A, Köninger J, Jansen-Winkeln B, et al. The TICAP-Study (titanium clips for appendicular stump closure): a prospective multicentre observational study on appendicular stump closure with an innovative titanium clip. BMC Surg. 2015. p. 85.
6.
Delibegović S, Mehmedovic Z. The influence of the different forms of appendix base closure on patient outcome in laparoscopic appendectomy: randomized trial. Surg Endosc. 2018. p. 2295–9.
7.
Delibegovic S, Mehmedovic Z. The Influence of the appendiceal base diameter on appendix stump closure in laparoscopic appendectomy. World J Surg. 2016. p. 2342–7.
8.
Kosan M, Gonulalan U, Ozturk B, Kulacoglu S, Erguder I, Akdemir O, et al. Tissue reactions of suture materials (polyglactine 910, chromed catgut and polydioxa-none) on rat bladder wall and their role in bladder stone formation. Urol Res. 2008. p. 43–9.
9.
Delibegović S, Katica M, Latić F, Jakić-Razumović J, Koluh A, Njoum M. Biocompatibility and adhesion formation of different endoloop ligature in securing the base of the appendix. JSLS. 2013. p. 543–8.
10.
Delibegovic S, Iljazovic E, Katica M, Koluh A. Tissue reaction to absorbable endoloop, nonabsorbable titanium staples, and poly-mer Hem-o-lok clip after laparoscopic appendectomy. JSLS. 2011. p. 70–6.
11.
Beldi G, Vorburger S, Bruegger L, Kocher T, Inderbitzin D, Candinas D. Analysis of stapling vs endoloops in appendiceal stump closure. Br J Surg. 2006. p. 1390–3.
12.
Shippert R. A study of time-dependent operating room fees and how to save $100 000 by using timesaving products. AJCS. 2005. p. 25–34.
13.
Kwaznenski D, Six C, Stahfeld K. The unacknowledged incidence of laparoscopic stapler malfunction. Surg Endosc. 2013. p. 86–9.
14.
Sharma B, Teodor P, Grantcharov T. Laparoscopic Appendectomy (03.
15.
Safavi A, Langer M, Skarsgard E. Endoloop versus endostapler closure of the appendiceal stump in pediatric laparoscopic appendectomy. Can J Surg. 2012. p. 37–40.
16.
Colak E, Kement M, Ozlem N, Mutlu T, Yildirim K, Gurer A, et al. Comparison of nonabsorbable polymeric clips and endoloop ligatures for the closure of the appendicular stump in laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective, randomized study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Tech. 2013. p. 255–8.
17.
Taguchi Y, Komatsu S, Sakamoto E, Norimizu S, Shingu Y, Hasegawa H. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for complicated appendicitis in adults: a randomized. Surg Endosc. 2016. p. 1705–12.
18.
Delibegovic S. Radiologic advantages of potential use of polymer plastic clips in neurosurgery. World Neurosurg. 2014. p. 549–51.

Citation

Copyright

Authors retain copyright. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Creative Commons License

 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

{{ submission.title }}
Issue image
Vol 17, Issue 2, 2020
Pectoralis (PecS) nerve block 1 for port-a-cath removal and central venous catheter (CVC) replacement Interdisciplinary aspects of possible negative effects of dogs on humans in Bosnia and Herzegovina Securing the base of the appendix during laparoscopic appendectomy Epidemiology of injuries connected with dance: a critical review on epidemiology Spatio-temporal data visualization for monitoring of control measures in the prevention of the spread of COVID-19 in Bosnia and Herzegovina See full issue

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.