,
Division of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, University of Perugia, “S. Mariadella Misericordia” Hospital, Perugia, Italy
Division of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, University of Perugia, “S. Mariadella Misericordia” Hospital, Perugia, Italy
Division of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, University of Perugia, “S. Mariadella Misericordia” Hospital, Perugia, Italy
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, San Matteo degliInfermi Hospital, Spoleto, Italy
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Vito Fazzi Hospital, Lecce, Italy
Division of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Hospital Virgen de la Salud, Toledo, Spain
Division of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Hospital Quirónsalud y Hospital Laboral Solimat, Toledo, Spain
Department of General Medicine, “Hospital de Getafe”, Madrid, Madrid, Spain
Division of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Hospital Virgen de la Salud, Toledo, Spain
Division of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, University of Perugia, “S. Mariadella Misericordia” Hospital, Perugia, Italy
Multidisciplinary Department of Medical-Surgical and Dental Specialties, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Iceland
Multidisciplinary Department of Medical-Surgical and Dental Specialties, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
Multidisciplinary Department of Medical-Surgical and Dental Specialties, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
Multidisciplinary Department of Medical-Surgical and Dental Specialties, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, San Matteo degliInfermi Hospital, Spoleto, Italy
Aim
Distal femoral shaft fractures are characterized by increasing incidence and complexity and are still considered a challenging problem. No consensus on best surgical option has been achieved. The aim of this study is to investigate mineral bone densitometry, radiographic and clinical outcomes of locking retrograde intramedullary nailing (LRN) and non-locking retrograde intramedullary nailing (NLRN) regarding surgical treatment of distal femoral shaft fractures in adults based on the hypothesis that there is no statistical difference among the results of both surgical options.
Methods
Retrospective study: 30 patients divided into 2 groups (Group 1 LRN, Group 2 NLRN). Average age was 42.67±18.32 for Group 1 and 44.27±15.11 for Group 2 (range of age 18-65 for both groups). Gender ratio (male:female) was 2.75 (11:4) for both groups. AO Classification, Non Union Scoring System (NUSS) and Radiographic Union Score Hip (RUSH), Visual Analogic Score (VAS), Dexa scans, plain radiographs were used. Evaluation endpoint: 12 months after surgery.
Results
No statistical difference was obtained in terms of surgery time, transfusions or wound healing. There were similar results regarding average time of bone healing, RUSH scores, VAS, regression between RUSH and VAS, average correlation clinical-radiographic results and patients outcomes. Only one patient of LRN group had reduction of mineral bone densitometry values.
Conclusion
No statistical difference in terms of radiographic, bone densitometry and clinical outcomes among LNR and NLNR for the treatment of distal femur fractures was found. The presence of no statistical difference regarding radiological findings is the main factor supporting our hypothesis given their strong objectivity.
Authors retain copyright. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. 
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.