×
Home Current Archive Editorial Team
Contact
Original article

This is an early access version

Bayesian Model Prediction for Lung Cancer Survival Based on Demographic and Laboratory Results: A retrospective analysis.

By
Islam Bani Mohammad Orcid logo ,
Islam Bani Mohammad
Contact Islam Bani Mohammad

Al-Balqa Applied University , Al salt , Jordan

Muayyad Ahmad Orcid logo
Muayyad Ahmad

University of Jordan , Amman , Jordan

Editor: SELMA UZUNOVIĆ

Abstract

Aim: To examine the likelihood of predicting lung cancer survival versus death using Bayesian model based on demographic and laboratory data.

Methods: A predictive design using electronic health records from 2012 to 2023 was implemented. IBM SPSS Statistics version 29.0 was used for data descriptive analysis and prediction models were built using SPSS Modeler version 18.0. Among the eight generated models, the Bayesian model demonstrated the highest accuracy (71.9%) and the best area under the curve (AUC) at 80.304, showcasing its superior predictive performance for lung cancer outcome.

Results A total of 1,843 patients without missing values were used. Males constituted 64.2 % of total sample. About 70 % of the patients were aged between 46 and 99 years. The Bayesian Network identified seven key predictors for determining patient outcome (survival versus death). Among these, age was found as the most significant predictor of survival outcome.

Conclusion The Bayesian Network outperformed other models in predicting lung cancer survival versus death probability. The integration of routine laboratory testing and demographic data in the machine learning model can help in the prediction of lung cancer survival versus death.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.B.M. and M.A.; Data curation, I.B.M. and M.A.; Formal Analysis, I.B.M. and M.A.; Investigation, I.B.M. and M.A.; Methodology, I.B.M. and M.A.; Project administration, I.B.M.; Writing – original draft, I.B.M.; Writing – review & editing, M.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Citation

Funding Statement

No specific funding was received for this study.

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.