Aim To compare intraoperative hemodynamic and respiratory stability and postoperative emergence delirium between two anaesthesia regimens in children (caudal block with intravenous continuous analgosedation versus general endotracheal anaesthesia) and intensity of postoperative pain and quality of postoperative analgesia. Method Forty children aged 2-6 years who underwent lower abdominal surgery were randomized depending on performed anaesthesia into two groups: caudal block with analgosedation (group CB) and general endotracheal anaesthesia (group GA). Intraoperative hemodynamic and respiratory stability were evaluated measuring systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR) and arterial oxygen saturation (SaO 2) in preinduction (t 0), at the moment of surgical incision (t 1), 10 minutes after surgical incision (t 2) and at the time of skin suturing (t 3). Postoperative emergence delirium was evaluated using Paediatric Anaesthesia Emergence Delirium score (PAED). Postoperative pain was evaluated by Children's and Infants' Postoperative Pain score (CHIPPS). Both scores were recorded every 5 minutes during first half hour postoperatively, additionally after 60 minutes postoperatively for CHIPPS score. Results SBP, DBP and MAP were lower at t 1 (p<0.0001), t 2 (p<0.05) and t 3 (p<0.001) in the group CB. HR was lower at all studied time points (p<0.005) in the group CB. SaO 2 was lower in the CB group but comparable with the GA group. PAED and CHIPPS scores were lower at 5, 10, 15, 20 and 25 minutes postoperatively (p<0.001) in the CB group. Conclusion Caudal block with analgosedation provides better control of intraoperative hemodynamic conditions, postoperative emergence delirium and postoperative pain than general endotracheal anaesthesia.
De Graaff J, Sarfo M, Van Wolfswinkel L, Van Der Werff D, Schouten A. Anesthesia-related critical incidents in the perioperative period in children; a proposal for an anesthesia-related reporting system for critical incidents in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2015;621–9.
2.
Rhondali O, Andre C, Pouyau A, Mahr A, Juhel S, Queiroz D, et al. Sevoflurane anesthesia and brain perfusion. Paediatr Anaesth. 2015;180–5.
3.
Wolf A. Effects of regional analgesia on stress responses to pediatric surgery. Pediatr Anesth. 2011;19–24.
4.
Jöhr M, Berger T. Caudal blocks. Paediatr Anaesth. 2012;44–50.
5.
Schuepfer G, Konrad C, Schmeck J, Poortmans G, Staffelbach B, Jöhr M. Generating a learning curve for pediatric caudal epidural blocks: An empirical evaluation of technical skills in novice and experienced anesthetists. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2000;385–8.
6.
Edler A, Wellis W. Caudal epidural anesthesia for pediatric patients: a safe, reliable and effective method in developing countries. Update Anesthesia. 2003;15–9.
7.
Sharma T, Shah N, Patel J, Chhaya A, Upadhyaya R. Comparison of general anaesthesia v/s caudal epidural in paediatric infra umbilical surgeries. IJBR. 2015;35–9.
8.
Brenner L, Kettner S, Marhofer P, Latzke D, Willschke H, Kimberger O, et al. Caudal anaesthesia under sedation: a prospective analysis of 512 infants and children. Br J Anaesth. 2010;751–5.
9.
Amornyotin S. Ketofol: a combination of ketamine and propofol. J Anesth Crit Care Open Access. 2014;31.
10.
Karkera M, Harrison D, Aunspaugh J, Martin T. Assessing caudal block concentrations of bupivacaine with and without the addition of intravenous fentanyl on postoperative outcomes in pediatric patients: a retrospective review. Am J Ther. 2016;792–8.
11.
Sikich N, Lerman J. Development and psychometric evaluation of the pediatric anesthesia emergence delirium scale. Anesthesiology. 2004;1138–45.
12.
Büttner W, Finke W. Analysis of behavioural and physiological parameters for the assessment of postoperative analgesic demand in newborns, infants and young children: a comprehensive report on seven consecutive studies. Paediatr Anaesth. 2000;303–18.
13.
Hoelzie M, Weiss M, Dillier C, Gerber A. Comparison of awake spinal with awake caudal anesthesia in preterm and ex-preterm infants for herniotomy. Paediatr Anaesth. 2010;620–4.
14.
Gulec H, Sahin S, Ozayar E, Degerli S, Bercin F, Ozdemir O. Ketamine-propofol sedation in circumcision. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2015;367–70.
15.
Shah A, Mosdossy G, Mcleod S, Lehnhardt K, Peddle M, Rieder M. A blinded, randomized controlled trial to evaluate ketemine/propofol versus ketamine alone for procedural sedation in children. Ann Emerg Med. 2011;425–33.
16.
Alletag M, Auerbach M, Baum C. Ketamine, propofol and ketofol use for pediatric sedation. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012;1391–5.
17.
Stevic M, Ristic N, Budic I, Ladjevic N, Trifunovic B, Rakic I, et al. Comparison of ketamine and ketofol for deep sedation and analgesia in children undergoing laser procedure. Lasers Med Sci. 2017;1525–33.
18.
Sendasgupta C, Makhija N, Kiran U, Choudhary S, Lakshmy R, Das S. Caudal epidural sufentanil and bupivacaine decreases stress response in paediatric cardiac surgery. Ann Card Anaesth. 2009;27–33.
19.
Aouad M, Moussa A, Dagher C, Muwakkit S, Jabbour-Khoury S, Zbeidy R, et al. Addition of ketamine to propofol for initiation of procedural anesthesia in children reduces propofol consumption and preserves hemodynamic stability. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2008;561–5.
20.
Malan T, Dinardo J, Isner R, Frink E, Goldberg M, Fenster P, et al. Cardiovascular effects of sevoflurane compared with those of isoflurane in volunteers. Anesthesiology. 1995;918–918.
21.
Bajwa S, Bajwa S, Kaur J. Comparison of two drug combinations in total intravenous anesthesia: Propofol-ketamine and propofol-fentanyl. Saudi J Anaesth. 2010;72–9.
22.
Shah H, Jaishree S, Bhavsar M, Attal P, Ghosh S, Gandhi M, et al. A comparative study of caudal epidural anaesthesia versus general anaesthesia for lower abdominal and lower limb surgery in paediatric patients. Int J Biomed Res. 2013;589–94.
23.
Uguralp S, Mutus M, Koroglu A, Gurbuz N, Koltuksuz U, Demircan M. Regional anesthesia is a good alternative to general anesthesia in pediatric surgery: experience in 1,554 children. J Pediatr Surg. 2002;610–3.
24.
Zanaboni S, Krauss B, Buscaglia R, Montagnini C, Gratarola A, Gualino J, et al. Changes in respiratory and hemodynamic parameters during low-dose propofol sedation in combination with regional anesthesia for herniorhhaphy and genitourinary surgery in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2007;934–41.
25.
Janssen N, Tan E, Staal M, Janssen E, Leroy P, Lousberg R, et al. On the utility of diagnostic instruments for pediatric delirium in critical illness: an evaluation of the Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium Scale, the Delirium Rating Scale 88, and the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised R-98. Intensive Care Med. 2011;1331–7.
26.
Yan-Lin Z, Hong-Bo X. The clinical research to sevoflurane emergence agitation in children. J Clin Anesthesiol. 2010;988–92.
27.
Köner Ö, Türe H, Merkan A, Menda F, Sözübir S. Effects od hydroxyzine-midazolam premedication on sevoflurane-induced paediatric emergence agitation: a prospective randomised clinical trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011;640–5.
28.
Sinha A, Sood J. Caudal block and emergence delirium in pediatric patients: Is it analgesia or sedation. Saudi J Anaesth. 2012;403–7.
29.
Ali W, Mohammed A, Elshorbagy H. Dexmedetomidine versus ketofol on the incidence of emergence agitation associated with sevoflurane-based anesthesia in children undergoing ortopedic surgery. Egypt J Anaesth. 2016;277–84.
30.
Ibacache M, Munoz H, Fuentes R, Cortinez L. Dexmedetomidine-ketamine combination and caudal block for superficial lower abdominal and genital surgery in children. Paediatric Anaesthesia. 2015;499–505.
31.
Luz G, Innerhofer P, Häussler B, Oswald E, Salner E, Sparr H. Comparison of ropivacaine 0,1% and 0,2% with bupivacaine 0,2% for single shot anesthesia in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2000;499–504.
32.
Cinar S, Isil C, Sahin S, Paksay I. Caudal ropivacaine and bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia in infants undergoing lower abdominal surgery. Pak J Med Sci. 2015;903–8.
33.
De Negri P, Ivani G, Tirri T, Modano P, Reato C, Eksborg S, et al. A comparison of epidural bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and ropivacaine on postoperative analgesia and motor blockade. Anesth Analg. 2004;45–8.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
,
