Aim To define direct anatomical relations of the sphenoidal (alae minores), ethmoidal sinuses and optic nerve, with an emphasis on determining the effect of age on pneumatisation and dehiscence. Methods This retrospective, descriptive study involved 60 consecutive patients: 30 patients younger than 30 and30 patients older than 60 years of age. All patients underwent computerized tomography (CT). The relationship of the optic nerve and the sphenoidal and ethmoidal sinuses was classified. The presence of dehiscence in the bone structures, forming the optic canal, was checked. Dehiscence was defined as absence of visible bone density located between the sinus and the optic nerve. Protrusion of the optic nerve into the sphenoidal sinus was defined as optic nerve surrounded by pneumatised space. Results The most common type of relation between the optic nerve and sphenoidal sinus was type I, where the optic nerve was immediately adjacent to the lateral or superior wall of the sphenoidal sinus, without impression on the sinus wall. Dehiscence was documented in 15 (25%) cases, it was more common in older patients (8, 27%) than in younger ones (7, 23%). The pneumatisation processes were more frequent in patients over 60 (5, 17%) than in those younger than 30 years (4, 13%). Conclusion Surgeons and ophthalmologists should be aware of high frequency of dehiscence of sphenoidal sinus walls when treating adult patients in our population, especially when evaluating risks and complications of surgical procedures or when diagnosing inflammatory or tumorous processes in the close vicinity of posterior paranasal sinuses.
Al-Mujaini A, Wali U, Alkhabori M. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery: indications and complications in the ophthalmic field. Oman Med J. 2009;70–80.
2.
Chastain J, Sindwani R. Anatomy of the orbit, lacrimal apparatus, and lateral nasal wall. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2006;855–64.
3.
Stankiewicz J, Lal D, Connor M, Welch K. Complications in endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis: a 25-year experience. Laryngoscope. 2011;2684–701.
4.
El Kammash T, Enaba M, Awadalla A. Variability in sphenoid sinus pneumatization and its impact upon reduction and complications following sellar region surgeries. The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine. 2014;705–14.
5.
Chandler J, Langenbrunner D, Stevens E. The pathogenesis of orbital complications in acute sinusitis. Laryngoscope. 1970;1414–28.
6.
Rothstein J, Maisel R, Berlinger N, Wirtschafter J. Relationship of optic neuritis to disease of the paranasal sinuses. Laryngoscope. 1984;1501–8.
7.
Slavin M, Glaser J. Acute severe irreversible visual loss with sphenoethmoiditis “posterior” orbital cellulitis. Arch Ophthalmol. 1987;345–8.
8.
Simpson D, Moser L. Compressive optic neuropathy secondary to chronic sinusitis. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1988;757–62.
9.
Shimo-Oku M, Miyazaki S, Shiraki K, Sugimoto T, Sotani H. Optic nerve involvement in posterior paranasal sinus diseases. Neuro-Ophthalmology. 1989;147–55.
10.
Patt B, Manning S. Blindness resulting from orbital complications of sinusitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1991;789–90.
11.
Sato H, Tsukuda M, Mochimatsu I, Furukawa M, Sawaki S. Sinusitis associated with disorders of visual acuity. ORL J Othorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 1994;302–4.
12.
Postma G, Chole R, Nemzek W. Reversible blindness secondary to acute sphenoid sinusitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1995;742–6.
13.
Renn W, Rhoton A. Microsurgical anatomy of the sellar region. J Neurosurg. 1975;288–98.
14.
Bayram M, Sirikci A, Bayazit Y. Important anatomic variations of the sinonasal anatomy in light of endoscopic surgery: a pictorial review. Eur Radiol. 2001;1991–7.
15.
Delano M, Fun F, Zinreich S. Relationship of the optic nerve to the posterior paranasal sinuses: a CT anatomic study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1996;669–75.
16.
Moeller C, Welch K. Prevention and management of complications in sphenoidotomy. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2010;839–54.
17.
Dessi P, Moulin G, Castro F, Chagnaud C, Cannoni M. Protrusion of the optic nerve into the ethmoid and sphenoid sinus: prospective study of 150 CT studies. Neuroradiology. 1994;515–6.
18.
Al-Abri R, Bhargava D, Al-Bassam W, Al-Badaai Y, Sawhney S. Clinically significant anatomical variants of the paranasal sinuses. Oman Med J. 2014;110–3.
19.
Anderhuber W, Weiglein A, Wolf G. Cavitas nasi und Sinus paranasales in Neugeborenen-und Kindesalter. Acta Anat (Basel). 1992;120–6.
20.
Yonetsu K, Watanabe M, Nakamura T. Age-related expansion and reduction in aeration of the sphenoid sinus: volume assessment by helical CT scanning. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000;179–82.
21.
Dasar U, Gokce E. Evaluation of variations in sinonasal region with computed tomography. World J Radiol. 2016;98–108.
22.
Kikuchi R, Toda M, Tomita T, Ogawa K, Yoshida K. Analysis of sphenoid sinus lateral pneumatization for endonasal endoscopic surgery. Surg Neurol Int. 2015;166.
23.
Tomovic S, Esmaeili A, Chan N, Shukla P, Choudhry O, Liu J, et al. High-resolution computed tomography analysis of variations of the sphenoid sinus. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2013;82–90.
24.
Hewaidi G, Omami G. Anatomic variation of sphenoid sinus and related structures in Libyan population: CT scan study. Libyan J Med. 2008;128–33.
25.
Abuzayed B, Tanriover N, Biceroglu H, Yuksel O, Tanriover O, Albayram S, et al. Pneumatization degree of the anterior clinoid process: a new classification. Neurosurg Rev. 2010;367–73.
26.
Sapci T, Derin E, Almac S, Cumalı R, Saydam C, Karavus M. The relationship between the sphenoid and the posterior ethmoid sinuses and the optic nerves in Turkish patients. Rhinology. 2004;30–4.
27.
Kazkayasi M, Karadeniz Y, Arikan O. Anatomic variations of the sphenoid sinus on computed tomography. Rhinology. 2005;109–14.
28.
Mamatha H, Saraswathi G, Prasanna L. Variations of sphenoid sinus and their impact on related neurovascular structures. Indmedica. 2010;121–4.
29.
Heskova G, Mellova Y, Holomanova A, Vybohova D, Kunertova L, Marcekova M, et al. Assessment of the relation of the optic nerve to the posterior ethmoid and sphenoid sinuses by computed tomography. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2009;149–52.
30.
Perez-Pinas I, Sabate J, Carmona A, Herrera C, Jimenez-Castellanos C, J. Anatomical variations in the human paranasal sinus region studies by CT. J Anatomy. 2000;221–7.
31.
Badia L, Lund V, Wei W, Ho W. Ethnic variation in sinonasal anatomy on CT-scanning. Rhinology. 2005;210–4.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
