×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Review paper

Single-centre experience of emergency hernia surgery during COVID-19 pandemic: a comparative study of the operative activity and outcomes before and after the outbreak

By
Adnan Malik ,
Adnan Malik
Mohamed Zohdy ,
Mohamed Zohdy

Department of General Surgery, George Eliot Hospital NHS Trust, Warwickshire, United Kingdom

Aftab Ahmad ,
Aftab Ahmad

Department of General Surgery, George Eliot Hospital NHS Trust, Warwickshire, United Kingdom

Charalampos Seretis Orcid logo
Charalampos Seretis
Contact Charalampos Seretis

Department of General Surgery, George Eliot Hospital NHS Trust, Warwickshire, United Kingdom

Abstract

Aim
The outbreak of COVID-19 pandemic in January 2020 affected largely the elective operating for non-urgent surgical pathologies, such as hernias, due to periodical cancellations of the operating lists on a worldwide scale. To the best of our knowledge, the long-term impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in relation to the emergency hernia surgery operative workload and postoperative outcomes remains largely unknown.
Methods
Retrospective research of admission, operation and inpatient records of all patients who underwent emergency surgery
over a 2-year period (2019-2020) was done.
Results
An 18% increase in terms of emergency hernia surgery operating volume, with a 23% increase of visceral resections due
to unsalvageable herniated content strangulation was found. Overall morbidity did not increase during the pandemic period and there was no postoperative mortality or occurrence of COVID-19 related complications.
Conclusion
Emergency operative management of acutely symptomatic hernias can be safely performed even during the COVID-19
infection peak waves; hernia taxis should be reserved only for patients unfit or unwilling to undergo upfront surgery

References

1.
Hussain P, Kanwal A, Gopikrishna D. Resuming elective operations after COVID-19 pandemic. Br J Surg. 2020. p. 549.
2.
Poeran J, Zhong H, Wilson L, Liu J, Memtsoudis S. Cancellation of elective surgery and intensive care unit capacity in New York State: a retrospective cohort analysis. Anesth Analg. 2020. p. 1337–41.
3.
Cano-Valderrama O, Morales X, Ferrigni C, Martín-Antona E, Turrado V, García A, et al. Acute care surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic in Spain: changes in volume, causes and complications. A multicentre retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg. 2020. p. 157–61.
4.
Patriti A, Baiocchi G, Catena F, Marini P, Catarci M. Emergency general surgery in Italy during the COVID-19 outbreak: survey from the real life. World J Emerg Surg. 2020. p. 36.
5.
Burgard M, Cherbanyk F, Nassiopoulos K, Malekzadeh S, Pugin F, Egger B. An effect of the COVID-19 pandemic: significantly more complicated appendicitis due to delayed presentation of patients. PLoS One. 2021. p. 249171.
6.
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004. p. 205–13.
7.
Saklad M. Grading of patients for surgical procedures. Anesthesiology. 1941. p. 281–4.
8.
Köckerling F, Köckerling D. Schug-Pass C. Elective hernia surgery cancellation due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Hernia. 2020. p. 1143–5.
9.
Lima D, Pereira X, Santos D, Camacho D, Malcher D, F. Where are the hernias? A paradoxical decrease in emergency hernia surgery during CO-VID-19 pandemic. Hernia. 2020. p. 1141–2.
10.
Reichert M, Sartelli M, Weigand M, Weigand M, Doppstadt C, Hecker M, et al. WSES COVID-19 emergency surgery survey collaboration group et al. Impact of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on emergency surgery services-a multi-national survey among WSES members. World J Emerg Surg. 2020. p. 64.

Citation

Authors retain copyright. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Creative Commons License

 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.