×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Review paper

The ion resonance and bromelain-vitamin C vs bromelainvitamin C to prevent ankle complications in post-operative bimalleolar surgery

By
Luigi Meccariello Orcid logo ,
Luigi Meccariello
Contact Luigi Meccariello

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, AORN San Pio Hospital, Benevento, Italy

Anna Iolanda Bello ,
Anna Iolanda Bello

Rehabilitation Unit, AORN San Pio Hospital, Benevento, Italy

Giovanni Bove ,
Giovanni Bove

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, PO Ferdinando Veneziale, Isernia, Italy

Nicola Gagliardo ,
Nicola Gagliardo

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, PO San Giuliano, Giuliano, Italy

D’Anna Raffaele ,
D’Anna Raffaele

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, AORN San Anna and San Sebastiano Hospital, Caserta, Italy

Luigi Matera
Luigi Matera

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, AORN San Pio Hospital, Benevento, Italy

Abstract

Aim
To investigate whether the use of ion resonance and bromelain-vitamin C or bromelain-vitamin C is the best to prevent ankle complications in post operative bimalleolar surgery.
Methods
A total of 61 patients treated with bimalleolar surgery were enrolled. The patients were divided into three groups: the
first group (n=22) treated only with the surgery, the second group (n=18) treated by ion resonance and bromelain-vitamin C, and the third group (n=21) was treated with bromelain-vitamin C. All patients in the second and third group underwent adjuvant therapy for 50 days. The criteria to evaluate the three groups during the clinical and radiological follow-up were as follows: complications and soft tissue status. Bone healing measured by the Radiographic Union Score Ankle (RUSA), and functional results were evaluated according to the American Foot & Ankle Score (AFAS).
Results
In the first group nine (out of 22; 40.90%) patients developed complications, in the second group three (out of 18; 16.67%)
and in the third group seven (out of 21; 33.33%) presented complications. There is no statistical difference between the three groups regarding the type of fractures, mean age, gender ratio. The worst radiographic and stiffness results in the first group were found (p=0.006). The second group showed better bone healing (p=0.049), better performance in functional recovery measured by AFAS (p=0.039).
Conclusion
Ion resonance and bromelain-vitamin C group showed better outcomes to improve the functional outcome; it allows reduction of complications, consequently, an early return to quality life, and a corresponding improvement of the quality of life.

References

1.
Juto H, Nilsson H, Morberg P. Epidemiology of adult ankle fractures: 1756 cases identified in Norrbotten County during 2009-2013 and classified according to AO/OTA. Vol. 19, BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018.
2.
Petruccelli R, Bisaccia M, Rinonapoli G, Rollo G, Meccariello L, Falzarano G, et al. Tubular vs profile plate in peroneal or bimalleolar fractures: is there a real difference in skin complication? A retrospective study in three level i trauma center. Vol. 71, Med Arch. 2017. p. 265–9.
3.
Rohekar S. Daily vitamin C prevented development of complex regional pain syndrome in adults with wrist fractures. Vol. 13, Evid Based Med. 2008.
4.
Belousoviene E, Pranskuniene Z, Vaitkaitiene E, Pilvinis V, Pranskunas A. Effect of high-dose intravenous ascorbic acid on microcirculation and endothelial glycocalyx during sepsis and septic shock: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Vol. 23, BMC Anesthesiol. 2023.
5.
Malkoc A, Jong S, Fine K, Wong DT. High-dose intravenous versus low-dose oral vitamin C in burn care: potential protective effects in the severely burned: a retrospective cohort study. Vol. 85, Ann Med Surg (Lond. 2023. p. 1523–6.
6.
Moore A, Khanna D. The role of vitamin C in human immunity and its treatment potential against COVID-19: A review article. Vol. 15:e33740, Cureus. 2023.
7.
Jovičić MŠ, Pušić M, Antunović M, Ledinski M, Librenjak L, Kolundžić R, et al. In vitro effects of ascorbic acid on viability and metabolism of patients’ osteosarcoma stem cells. Vol. 72, Acta Pharm. 2022. p. 599–613.
8.
Juneja D, Nasa P, Jain R. Current role of high dose vitamin C in sepsis management: a concise review. Vol. 11, World J Crit Care Med. 2022. p. 349–63.
9.
Tanaka H, Broaderick P, Shimazaki S, Matsuda H, Hansalia H, Hanumadass M, et al. How long do we need to give antioxidant therapy during resuscitation when its administration is delayed for two hours? Vol. 13, J Burn Care Rehabil. 1992. p. 567–72.
10.
Buettner GH. The pecking order of free radicals and antioxidants: lipid peroxidation, alpha-tocopherol, and ascorbate. Vol. 300, Arch Biochem Biophys. 1993. p. 535–43.
11.
Gerasimova E, Salimgareeva E, Magasumova D, Ivanova A. Kinetic potentiometry as a method for studying the interactions of antioxidants with peroxyl radicals. Vol. 12, Antioxidants (Basel. 2023.
12.
Tragni V, Primiano G, Tummolo A, Beltrame LC, Piana G, Sgobba MN, et al. Personalized medicine in mitochondrial health and disease: molecular basis of therapeutic approaches based on nutritional supplements and their analogs. Vol. 27, Molecules. 2022.
13.
Varani K, Vincenzi F, Ravani A, Pasquini S, Merighi S, Gessi S, et al. Adenosine receptors as a biological pathway for the anti-inflammatory and beneficial effects of low frequency low energy pulsed electromagnetic fields. Vol. 2017, Mediators Inflamm. 2017.
14.
Vianale G, Reale M, Amerio P, Stefanachi M, Luzio S, Muraro R. Extremely low frequency electromagnetic field enhances human keratinocyte cell growth and decreases proinflammatory chemokine production. Vol. 158, Br J Dermatol. 2008. p. 1189–96.
15.
Zou J, Chen Y, Qian J, Yang H. Effect of a low-frequency pulsed electromagnetic field on expression and secretion of IL-1β and TNF-α in nucleus pulposus cells. Vol. 45, J Int Med Res. 2017. p. 462–70.
16.
Mahaki H, Jabarivasal N, Sardanian K, Zamani A. Effects of various densities of 50 Hz electromagnetic field on serum IL-9, IL-10, and TNF-α levels. Int J Occup Environ Med. 2019.
17.
Kaszuba-Zwoińska J, Ciećko-Michalska I, Madroszkiewicz D, Mach T, Słodowska-Hajduk Z, Rokita E, et al. Magnetic field anti-inflammatory effects in Crohn’s disease depends upon viability and cytokine profile of the immune competent cells. Vol. 59, J Physiol Pharmacol. 2008. p. 177–87.
18.
Vianale G, Reale M, Amerio P, Stefanachi M, Luzio S, Muraro R. Extremely low frequency electromagnetic field enhances human keratinocyte cell growth and decreases proinflammatory chemokine production. Vol. 158, Br J Dermatol. 2008. p. 1189–96.
19.
Ross CL, Harrison BS. Effect of time-varied magnetic field on inflammatory response in macrophage cell line RAW 264.7. Vol. 32, Electromagn Biol Med. 2013. p. 59–69.
20.
Ehnert S, Falldorf K, Fentz AK, Ziegler P, Schröter S, Freude T, et al. Primary human osteoblasts with reduced alkaline phosphatase and matrix mineralization baseline capacity are responsive to extremely low frequency pulsed electromagnetic field exposure - clinical implication possible. Vol. 3, Bone Rep. 2015. p. 48–56.
21.
Ehnert S, Schröter S, Aspera-Werz RH, Eisler W, Falldorf K, Ronniger M, et al. Translational insights into extremely low frequency pulsed electromagnetic fields (ELF-PEMFs) for bone regeneration after trauma and orthopedic surgery. Vol. 8, J Clin Med. 2019.
22.
Rollo G, Russi V, Meccariello L. Effects of a combination of Bromelain and Boswellia Serrata Casperome on swelling, pain, stiffness and complications in ankle fracture. Vol. 73, Minerva Orthopedics. 2022. p. 518–22.
23.
Yang J, Feng Y, Li Q, Zeng Y. Evidence of the static magnetic field effects on bone-related diseases and bone cells. Vol. 177, Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2023. p. 168–80.
24.
Cadossi R, Massari L, Racine-Avila J, Aaron RK. Pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation of bone healing and joint preservation: cellular mechanisms of skeletal response. Vol. 4:e1900155, J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2020.
25.
Graaf MT, Beukelaar JW, PC B, TM L, J K, PA S, et al. Contamination of synthetic HuD protein spanning peptide pools with a CMV-encoded peptide. Vol. 73, Cytometry A. 2008. p. 1079–85.
26.
Hussaarts L, Kaisar MMM, Guler AT, Dalebout H, Everts B, Deelder AM, et al. Human dendritic cells with Th2-polarizing capacity: analysis using label-free quantitative proteomics. Vol. 174, Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2017. p. 170–82.
27.
Evola FR, Fede GF, Evola G, Barchitta M, Agodi A, Longo G. Locking plates for distal fibula fractures in young and elderly patients: a retrospective study. Vol. 14, World J Orthop. 2023. p. 540–6.
28.
Salas-Gómez D, Fernández-Gorgojo M, Sánchez-Juan P, Pérez-Núñez MI, Laguna-Bercero E, Prat-Luri A, et al. Measuring recovery and understanding long-term deficits in balance, ankle mobility and hip strength in people after an open reduction and internal fixation of bimalleolar fracture and their impact on functionality: a 12-month longitudinal study. Vol. 11, J Clin Med. 2022.
29.
Koujan K, Saber AY. Bimalleolar Ankle Fractures. In: StatPearls [Internet] Treasure Island. 2023.
30.
Seth I, Bulloch G, Seth N, Siu A, Clayton S, Lower K, et al. Effect of perioperative vitamin C on the incidence of complex regional pain syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Vol. 61, J Foot Ankle Surg. 2022. p. 748–54.
31.
Luna V, A C, C C, M M, K E, Maio F, et al. Clinical and radiological results after fracture-dislocations of the ankle: a medium- to long-term followup study. Vol. 7, J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2022.
32.
Eidmann A, Eisert M, Rudert M, Stratos I. Influence of vitamin D and C on bone marrow edema syndrome-a scoping review of the literature. Vol. 11, J Clin Med. 2022.
33.
Plisky PJ, Gorman PP, Butler RJ, Kiesel KB, Underwood FB, Elkins B. The reliability of an instrumented device for measuring components of the star excursion balance test. Vol. 4, N Am J Sports Phys Ther. 2009. p. 92–9.
34.
Falzarano G, Pica G, Medici A, Rollo G, Bisaccia M, Cioffi R, et al. Foot loading and gait analysis evaluation of nonarticular tibial pilon fracture: a comparison of three surgical techniques. Vol. 57, J Foot Ankle Surg. 2018. p. 894–8.

Citation

Authors retain copyright. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Creative Commons License

 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.