Aim This study provides a comprehensive review of the current literature on the use of ChatGPT, a generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) tool, in neurosurgery. The study examines potential benefits and limitations of ChatGPT in neurosurgical practice and education. Methods The study involved a systematic review of the current literature on the use of AI in neurosurgery, with a focus on ChatGPT. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed to ensure a comprehensive and transparent review process. Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis. The data extracted from the included studies were analysed and synthesized to provide an overview of the current state of research on the use of ChatGPT in neurosurgery. Results The ChatGPT showed a potential to complement and enhance neurosurgical practice. However, there are risks and limitations associated with its use, including question format limitations, validation challenges, and algorithmic bias. The study highlights the importance of validating machine-generated content for accuracy and addressing ethical concerns associated with AI technologies. The study also identifies potential benefits of ChatGPT, such as providing personalized treatment plans, supporting surgical planning and navigation, and enhancing large data processing efficiency and accuracy. Conclusion The integration of AI technologies into neurosurgery should be approached with caution and careful consideration of ethical and validation issues. Continued research and development of AI tools in neurosurgery can help us further understand their potential benefits and limitations.
Liu J, Wang C, Liu S. Utility of ChatGPT in Clinical Practice. Vol. 25:e48568, J Med Internet Res. 2023.
2.
Sohail SS. A promising start and not a panacea: ChatGPT’s early impact and potential in medical science and biomedical engineering research. Ann Biomed Eng. 2023.
3.
Huang J, Tan M. The role of ChatGPT in scientific communication: writing better scientific review articles. Vol. 13, Am J Cancer Res. 2023. p. 1148–54.
4.
Amisha MP, M P, VK R. Overview of artificial intelligence in medicine. Vol. 8, J Family Med Prim Care. 2019. p. 2328–31.
5.
Aung YYM, Wong DCS, Ting DSW. The promise of artificial intelligence: a review of the opportunities and challenges of artificial intelligence in healthcare. Vol. 139, Br Med Bull. 2021. p. 4–15.
6.
Beyaz S. A brief history of artificial intelligence and robotic surgery in orthopedics & traumatology and future expectations. Vol. 31, Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2020. p. 653–5.
7.
Iqbal JD, Christen M. The use of artificial intelligence applications in medicine and the standard required for healthcare provider-patient briefings-an exploratory study. Vol. 8, Digit Health. 2022.
8.
Begagic E, Duzic N, Memic Z, Arandelovic N, Celebic A, Beculic H. Usage of students’ potential in biomedical and health care research in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Vol. 36, Medeni Med J. 2021. p. 44–51.
9.
Sallam M. ChatGPT utility in healthcare education, research, and practice: systematic review on the promising perspectives and valid concerns. Vol. 11, Healthcare (Basel. 2023. p. 1–20.
10.
Cascella M, Montomoli J, Bellini V, Bignami E. Evaluating the feasibility of ChatGPT in healthcare: an analysis of multiple clinical and research scenarios. Vol. 47, J Med Syst. 2023. p. 33–8.
11.
Homolak J. Opportunities and risks of ChatGPT in medicine, science, and academic publishing: a modern Promethean dilemma. Vol. 64, Croat Med J. 2023. p. 1–3.
12.
Sharma S, Pajai S, Prasad R, Wanjari MB, Munjewar PK, Sharma R, et al. A Critical review of ChatGPT as a potential substitute for diabetes educators. Vol. 15:e38380, Cureus. 2023.
13.
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Vol. 372:n71, BMJ. 2021.
14.
Ali R, Tang OY, Connolly ID, Fridley JS, Shin JH, Zadnik Sullivan PL, et al. Performance of ChatGPT, GPT-4, and Google Bard on a neurosurgery oral boards preparation question bank.
15.
D’Amico RS, White TG, Shah HA, Langer DJ. I asked a ChatGPT to write an editorial about how we can incorporate chatbots into neurosurgical research and patient care. Vol. 92, Neurosurgery. 2023. p. 663–4.
16.
Duey AH, Nietsch KS, Zaidat B, Ren R, Ndjonko LCM, Shrestha N, et al. Thromboembolic prophylaxis in spine surgery: an analysis of ChatGPT recommendations. Spine J. 2023.
17.
Haemmerli J, Sveikata L, Nouri A, May A, Egervari K, Freyschlag C, et al. ChatGPT in glioma adjuvant therapy decision making: ready to assume the role of a doctor in the tumour board? BMJ Health Care Inform. 2023. p. 30.
18.
He Y, Tang H, Wang D, Gu S, Ni G, Wu H. Will ChatGPT/GPT-4 be a lighthouse to guide spinal surgeons? Vol. 51, Ann Biomed Eng. 2023. p. 1362–5.
19.
Hegde A, Srinivasan S, Menon G. Extraventricular neurocytoma of the posterior fossa: a case report written by ChatGPT. Vol. 15:e35850, Cureus. 2023.
20.
Kuang YR, Zou MX, Niu HQ, Zheng BY, Zheng BW. ChatGPT encounters multiple opportunities and challenges in neurosurgery. Int J Surg. 2023.
21.
A LM. Towards precision medicine in spinal surgery: leveraging AI technologies. Ann Biomed Eng. 2023.
22.
Mishra A, Begley SL, Chen A, Rob M, Pelcher I, Ward M, et al. Exploring the intersection of artificial intelligence and neurosurgery: let us be cautious with ChatGPT. Neurosurgery. 2023. p. 93.
23.
Sevgi UT, Erol G, Doğruel Y, Sönmez OF, Tubbs RS, Güngor A. The role of an open artificial intelligence platform in modern neurosurgical education: a preliminary study. Vol. 46, Neurosurg Rev. 2023. p. 86–92.
24.
Singh R, Reardon T, Srinivasan VM, Gottfried O, Bydon M, Lawton MT. Implications and future directions of ChatGPT utilization in neurosurgery. J Neurosurg. 2023.
25.
Zamarud A, Marianayagam N, Sekar V, Chang SD, Meola A. Treatment outcomes of leiomyosarcoma metastasis affecting the brachial plexus: a comparative case report using chat generative pre-trained transformer (ChatGPT. Vol. 15:e36715, Cureus. 2023.
26.
Zamarud A, Park DJ, Haider G, Chang SD, Meola A. Cyberknife radiosurgery for synovial sarcoma metastasizing to the spine: illustrative case reports. Vol. 15:e37087, Cureus. 2023.
27.
Biswas SS. Role of Chat GPT in public health. Vol. 51, Ann Biomed Eng. 2023. p. 868–9.
28.
Datt M, Sharma H, Aggarwal N, Sharma S. Role of ChatGPT-4 for medical researchers. Ann Biomed Eng. 2023.
29.
Chintagunta B, Katariya N, Amatriain X, Kannan A. Medically aware GPT-3 as a data generator for medical dialogue summarization. Vol. 126, Proceedings of Machine Learning Research. 2021. p. 1–18.
30.
Milne-Ives M, Cock C, Lim E, Shehadeh MH, Pennington N, Mole G, et al. The effectiveness of artificial intelligence conversational agents in health care: systematic review. Vol. 22:e20346, J Med Internet Res. 2020.
31.
Lyu Q, Tan J, Zapadka ME, Ponnatapura J, Niu C, Myers KJ, et al. Translating radiology reports into plain language using ChatGPT and GPT-4 with prompt learning: results, limitations, and potential. Vol. 6, Vis Comput Ind Biomed Art. 2023. p. 9–15.
32.
Jeblick K, Schachtner B, Dexl J, Mittermeier A, Stüber A, Topalis J, et al. ChatGPT makes medicine easy to swallow: an exploratory case study on simplified radiology reports.
33.
Waisberg E, Ong J, Masalkhi M, Kamran SA, Zaman N, Sarker P, et al. GPT-4 and ophthalmology operative notes. Ann Biomed Eng. 2023.
34.
Patel SB, Lam K. ChatGPT: the future of discharge summaries? Vol. 5, Lancet Digit Health. 2023. p. 107–8.
35.
Temsah MH, Aljamaan F, Malki KH, Alhasan K, Altamimi I, Aljarbou R, et al. ChatGPT and the future of digital health: a study on healthcare workers’ perceptions and expectations. Vol. 11, Healthcare (Basel. 2023.
36.
Liu S, Wright AP, Patterson BL, Wanderer JP, Turer RW, Nelson SD, et al. Using AI-generated suggestions from ChatGPT to optimize clinical decision support. Vol. 30, J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023. p. 1237–45.
37.
Pojskić M, Bopp M, Saß B, Kirschbaum A, Nimsky C, Carl B. Intraoperative computed tomographybased navigation with augmented reality for lateral approaches to the spine. Vol. 11, Brain Sci. 2021. p. 646–54.
38.
Wang C, Liu S, Yang H, Guo J, Wu Y, Liu J. Ethical considerations of using ChatGPT in health care. Vol. 25:e48009, J Med Internet Res. 2023.
39.
Guleria A, Krishan K, Sharma V, Kanchan T. ChatGPT: Forensic, legal, and ethical issues. Vol. 2023, Med Sci Law.
40.
Zhang J, Zhang ZM. Ethics and governance of trustworthy medical artificial intelligence. Vol. 23, BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023. p. 7–14.
41.
Anders BA. Is using ChatGPT cheating, plagiarism, both, neither, or forward thinking? Patterns. Vol. 4. 2023.
42.
Zanca F, Brusasco C, Pesapane F, Kwade Z, Beckers R, Avanzo M. Regulatory aspects of the use of artificial intelligence medical software. Vol. 32, Semin Radiat Oncol. 2022. p. 432–41.
43.
Karhade AV, Thio QCBS, Ogink PT, Shah AA, Bono CM, Oh KS, et al. Development of machine learning algorithms for prediction of 30-day mortality after surgery for spinal metastasis. Vol. 85, Neurosurgery. 2019. p. 83–91.
44.
Ames CP, Smith JS, Pellisé F, Kelly M, Alanay A, Acaroglu E, et al. Artificial intelligence based hierarchical clustering of patient types and intervention categories in adult spinal deformity surgery: towards a new classification scheme that predicts quality and value. Vol. 44, Spine. 2019. p. 915–26.
45.
Azimi P, Mohammadi HR, Benzel EC, Shahzadi S, Azhari S. Use of artificial neural networks to predict recurrent lumbar disk herniation. Clinical Spine Surgery. 2015. p. 28.
46.
Feng S, Shen Y. ChatGPT and the future of medical education. Vol. 98, Acad Med. 2023. p. 867–8.
47.
Deik A. Potential benefits and perils of incorporating ChatGPT to the movement disorders clinic. Vol. 16, J Mov Disord. 2023. p. 158–62.
48.
Taira K, Itaya T, Hanada A. Performance of the large language model ChatGPT on the national nurse examinations in japan: evaluation study. Vol. 6:e47305, JMIR Nurs. 2023.
49.
Eysenbach G. The role of ChatGPT, generative language models, and artificial intelligence in medical education: a conversation with ChatGPT and a call for papers. Vol. 9:e46885, JMIR Med Educ. 2023.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
,
